PCD TC 2010-11-03 Webex: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m →Proposed Agenda: update dates |
m move to archive |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Proposed Agenda == | == Proposed Agenda == | ||
:# Agenda Approval | :# Agenda Approval | ||
:# Review Discussion Summaries: | :# Review Discussion Summaries: Joint Planning and Technical Committee Meeting [[PCD PC&TC 2010-10-13 Webex]], and the TC portion of the F2F [[PCD PC&TC 2010-10-18 to 22 F2F]] and the Joint PC and TC meeting October 27 [[PCD PC&TC 2010-10-27 Webex]] | ||
:# Ballots in progress | |||
:# Connectathon or Showcase updates? | |||
:# Any Profile and Work Item Updates? | |||
:# Tech Topics | |||
::# WCM Discussion Continued from F2F | |||
::# Risk Management | |||
::# Device-Patient Association | |||
::# Event Communication (infusion pump) review | |||
::# | :# Action Item Review | ||
::# | :# Additional Business | ||
:# Next Meetings | |||
: | |||
: | |||
== Action Items from Previous Meetings == | == Action Items from Previous Meetings == | ||
| Line 56: | Line 39: | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
'''Chair:''' John Rhoads | |||
Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, John Garguilo, Sarah Hopkins, Alexander Kraus, Khalil Maalouf, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Erin Sparnon, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst | |||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| Line 75: | Line 57: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* Agenda approved | :* Agenda approved | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 82: | Line 64: | ||
| '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair | | '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted | :* Discussion Summary of most recent previous meeting (Oct. 27) was accepted | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 3 | | align="center" | 3 | ||
| ''' | | '''Announcements''' <br>- All | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* | :* Todd asked for an update on Clinical System Integration. | ||
:* Final Text TF: The ballot will be extended at least through Monday, with only a couple of ballots cast to date. | |||
:* Connectathon: John Garguilo noted that his tutorial on the NIST test tool was recorded and the link has been sent. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 99: | Line 84: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 4 | | align="center" | 4 | ||
| ''' | | '''WCM Waveform Attributes''' <br>- Paul | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* | Paul discussed the proposal emailed earlier with the most likely potential solutions. It is available at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/WCM/WaveformAttrs%201c-20101101.doc | ||
:* Option A: This one has a lot of repetitive common components for channels with many of the same attributes. DICOM has a “waveform component group” which addresses this. | |||
:* Option B: This groups common attributes, with individual attributes that are not common provided at the facet level. | |||
::- Paul noted that Continua uses a pointer mechanism (handle) to tie related data together (Option B1), and noted that this is not supported in HL7. One way this could work is to provide the attributes within the first item (e.g. an ECG lead) is provided and subsequent items would point to this first one. Paul noted that the repeated portions could be defined as the children of a certain level (e.g., OBX-5 = 1.1.1.1.*). | |||
::- Option B2 is also not supported in HL7 at this time. Khalil asked if an existing filter can be overridden by an individual facet setting in an individual channel (and this would imply option A will work as well). Paul responded that attributes could be overridden or not according to rules that need to be established, noting that this is more complex, but has the benefit of increased flexibility and will be more compact. | |||
:- Alex suggested that this might be added within 11073. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
There was apparent consensus that Option B would be used. Paul asked if HL7 would agree without a change to be included in version 2.8, requiring significant delay. | |||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
Paul will draft an update with several pointer ideas. Discussion indicated that overriding a previously defined attribute will require consultation with HL7 Orders and Observations. If they object this could take two years. | |||
| Line 166: | Line 108: | ||
''The next TC meeting will be November 17 [[PCD TC 2010-11-17 Webex]] '' | ''The next TC meeting will be November 17 [[PCD TC 2010-11-17 Webex]] '' | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 20 July 2012
Patient Care Device Domain
Meeting Purpose
Regularly Scheduled TC Meeting
WebEx Information
Topic: PCD Technical Committee Meeting
- Regularly Scheduled Meeting
Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)
Duration: 60 Minutes
Proposed Agenda
- Agenda Approval
- Review Discussion Summaries: Joint Planning and Technical Committee Meeting PCD PC&TC 2010-10-13 Webex, and the TC portion of the F2F PCD PC&TC 2010-10-18 to 22 F2F and the Joint PC and TC meeting October 27 PCD PC&TC 2010-10-27 Webex
- Ballots in progress
- Connectathon or Showcase updates?
- Any Profile and Work Item Updates?
- Tech Topics
- WCM Discussion Continued from F2F
- Risk Management
- Device-Patient Association
- Event Communication (infusion pump) review
- Action Item Review
- Additional Business
- Next Meetings
Action Items from Previous Meetings
See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.
Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
Participants
Chair: John Rhoads Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, John Garguilo, Sarah Hopkins, Alexander Kraus, Khalil Maalouf, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Erin Sparnon, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
Discussion
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda approved
Action(s):
2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - Discussion Summary of most recent previous meeting (Oct. 27) was accepted
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):3 Announcements
- AllStatus/Discussion: - Todd asked for an update on Clinical System Integration.
- Final Text TF: The ballot will be extended at least through Monday, with only a couple of ballots cast to date.
- Connectathon: John Garguilo noted that his tutorial on the NIST test tool was recorded and the link has been sent.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 WCM Waveform Attributes
- PaulStatus/Discussion: Paul discussed the proposal emailed earlier with the most likely potential solutions. It is available at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/WCM/WaveformAttrs%201c-20101101.doc
- Option A: This one has a lot of repetitive common components for channels with many of the same attributes. DICOM has a “waveform component group” which addresses this.
- Option B: This groups common attributes, with individual attributes that are not common provided at the facet level.
- - Paul noted that Continua uses a pointer mechanism (handle) to tie related data together (Option B1), and noted that this is not supported in HL7. One way this could work is to provide the attributes within the first item (e.g. an ECG lead) is provided and subsequent items would point to this first one. Paul noted that the repeated portions could be defined as the children of a certain level (e.g., OBX-5 = 1.1.1.1.*).
- - Option B2 is also not supported in HL7 at this time. Khalil asked if an existing filter can be overridden by an individual facet setting in an individual channel (and this would imply option A will work as well). Paul responded that attributes could be overridden or not according to rules that need to be established, noting that this is more complex, but has the benefit of increased flexibility and will be more compact.
- - Alex suggested that this might be added within 11073.
Decisions/Issues: There was apparent consensus that Option B would be used. Paul asked if HL7 would agree without a change to be included in version 2.8, requiring significant delay.
Action(s): Paul will draft an update with several pointer ideas. Discussion indicated that overriding a previously defined attribute will require consultation with HL7 Orders and Observations. If they object this could take two years.
Next Meeting
The next meetings will be The next TC meeting will be November 17 PCD TC 2010-11-17 Webex PCD Home