Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-17"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* Approval of [[IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-03 | January 3, 2012 Minutes]]  
 
* Approval of [[IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-03 | January 3, 2012 Minutes]]  
  
−
3. New Business: from [[Domain Coord - Future Agenda Topics| Future Agenda Topics Page]]   
+
3. New Business: from [[Domain Coord - Future Agenda Topics| Future Agenda Topics Page]]  - not reviewed
  
−
4. Review [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pVUiOBnER-C7e5Xk4_w1kJw Action Items List]
+
4. Review [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pVUiOBnER-C7e5Xk4_w1kJw Action Items List] - not reviewed
  
 
===[[Domain Communication|Domain Announcements]]===
 
===[[Domain Communication|Domain Announcements]]===
Line 68: Line 68:
 
* Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - Karen W
 
* Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - Karen W
 
:* '''Problem Statement:''' General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups.  Result is lower quality profiles.  Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
 
:* '''Problem Statement:''' General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups.  Result is lower quality profiles.  Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
 +
::* General agreement: quality gap becoming evident at Trial Implemenation due to less review during Public Comment
 +
::* committee members overwhelmed by number of new supplements/fatigue
 +
::* Problem is both internal to committees as well as external (cross-domain)
 +
::* Strength of IHE is speed (annual cycle) and vendor input during implementation phase; perception is TI version quality may suffer as a result; vendor input during TI phase is very valuable however
 +
::* Decision to go to Final Text is crucial if quality is suffering in TI
 +
::* Discourage sub-committees or small groups within domains; moves away from broader review and understanding
 
::* Proposal for a new rule: anyone who submits a profile has to also review two profiles
 
::* Proposal for a new rule: anyone who submits a profile has to also review two profiles
−
::* '''Proposal''': create implementer groups for profiles (or groups of profiles) in trial implementation
+
::* '''Key Proposal''': create implementer groups for profiles (or groups of profiles) in trial implementation
 
:::* Use Connectathons to recruit implementers to provide feedback; schedule follow-up call before and after each major Connectathon (four calls per year?)
 
:::* Use Connectathons to recruit implementers to provide feedback; schedule follow-up call before and after each major Connectathon (four calls per year?)
 
:::* Profile authors need to participate in discussions and respond to input from implementers
 
:::* Profile authors need to participate in discussions and respond to input from implementers

Revision as of 11:51, 17 January 2012

Attendees

  • Sidrah Abdul - RO
  • Juergen Brandstaetter - Pharmacy
  • Chris Carr - RSNA/Secretary
  • Tom Dolan - Cardiology
  • Simon Letellier - Pharmacy
  • Flora Lum - Eye Care
  • Kevin O'Donnell - Radiology
  • Teri Sippel Schmidt - Process Specialist
  • Karen Witting - ITI

Absent domains: Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory, Patient Care Coordination, Patient Care Device, QRPH

  • Quorum not attained. See roster

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

2. Not reviewed (no quorum), move forward to next call:

3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page - not reviewed

4. Review Action Items List - not reviewed

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

  • reminder - follow the link above for simple templates for announcements
  • Radiology preparing supplements for public comment; Technical Committee meeting this week
    • Plan for Public Comment in February
    • Are currently using the new Technical Framework Supplement template

2. Domain Board Reports (10 min - Karen Witting)

  • Action: Kevin O'D- update Board report template;create a new template for Provisional domains
  • Action: Karen W- discuss new Provisional template with both Endoscopy and Dental
  • Updated Domain Reports process page with clearer procedure steps -reviewed with no additional comments
  • Cardiology report did not get reviewed at the last Board call
  • Action: Chris C - include in next Board agenda on Feb 9th

Domain Coordination Issues

  • Input received in various formats from most domains
  • Mike Nausbaum synthesizing formats for review at next Board mtg at HIMSS Feb 9th
  • Update on outcome of North American Connectathon 2012 - Kevin O'D and Chris Carr
  • All numbers are UP 10-20% across the board - huge success!
  • 117 vendors
  • 169 systems
  • 480 vendor engineers
  • 20-30% increase in number of profiles/actors per system
  • 63 monitors
  • plus additional staff
  • >4000 test instances completed and verified!!!
  • 170 mid-week conference attendees
  • connectathon walk-throughs well attended and much better scripted
  • conference presentations -many by IDNs and deployments
  • conference presentations will be published on ihe.net
  • Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - Karen W
  • Problem Statement: General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups. Result is lower quality profiles. Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
  • General agreement: quality gap becoming evident at Trial Implemenation due to less review during Public Comment
  • committee members overwhelmed by number of new supplements/fatigue
  • Problem is both internal to committees as well as external (cross-domain)
  • Strength of IHE is speed (annual cycle) and vendor input during implementation phase; perception is TI version quality may suffer as a result; vendor input during TI phase is very valuable however
  • Decision to go to Final Text is crucial if quality is suffering in TI
  • Discourage sub-committees or small groups within domains; moves away from broader review and understanding
  • Proposal for a new rule: anyone who submits a profile has to also review two profiles
  • Key Proposal: create implementer groups for profiles (or groups of profiles) in trial implementation
  • Use Connectathons to recruit implementers to provide feedback; schedule follow-up call before and after each major Connectathon (four calls per year?)
  • Profile authors need to participate in discussions and respond to input from implementers
  • Bring proposal to Board for consideration of broader implementation
  • Add to next DCC call for further review

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

  • Documentation Work Group (15 min - Teri Sippel Schmidt; Mary Jungers)
  • progress made on TF General Introduction
  • any questions so far? plan/schedule going forward.

Governance Implementation

Next steps and New Actions Items

  • Next Call Jan 31, 2012

Domain Coordination Committee

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=IHE_Domain_Coordination_Committee_Teleconference_Minutes_2012-01-17&oldid=57247"