Difference between revisions of "PCD TC 2010-06-30 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Discussion: first cut at entering notes)
m (continue to enter notes)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
:# Agenda Approval
 
:# Agenda Approval
 
:# Review Discussion Summaries: June 16 [[PCD TC 2010-06-16 Webex]]
 
:# Review Discussion Summaries: June 16 [[PCD TC 2010-06-16 Webex]]
−
:# Spring F2F Follow Up with specific attention to DPI and collaboration with ICE  
+
:# DPI and collaboration with ICE  
 
:# AAMI 2010 Update: Presentations, Mini-Showcase
 
:# AAMI 2010 Update: Presentations, Mini-Showcase
 
:# Review AAMI Mini-Showcase Event in Tampa
 
:# Review AAMI Mini-Showcase Event in Tampa
Line 73: Line 73:
 
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>- As Noted
 
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>- As Noted
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
Item 3: Discussion continues related to concepts and developing the plan of action.  
+
Item 3: DPI and ICE: Discussion continues related to concepts and developing the plan of action.  
  
−
Item 4: Todd summarized PCD activities at AAMI. The Saturday morning AAMI Symposium focused on Meaningful Use was well received. PCD was well represented by Jon, Elliot. Steve, Ken, Todd and Elliot presented an update on PCD on Monday, and the demonstration was also well received. Manny and Ken described the recruiting effort and noted that MEM should be able to begin work on messages, and that at least one device vendor appeared strongly interested. John summarized the discussion with AAMI leadership that took place on Saturday.
+
Items 4, 5: Todd summarized PCD activities at AAMI. The Saturday morning AAMI Symposium focused on Meaningful Use was well received. PCD was well represented by Jon, Elliot. Steve, Ken, Todd and Elliot presented an update on PCD on Monday, and the demonstration was also well received. Manny and Ken described the recruiting effort and noted that MEM should be able to begin work on messages, and that at least one device vendor appeared strongly interested. John summarized the discussion with AAMI leadership that took place on Saturday.
  
−
Item 6: Todd summarized activity with IHE-K including discussion about whether it is necessary to have a separate profile for different transport methods.
+
Item 6: IHE Korea Connectathon & ITI WS* Testing Support: Todd summarized activity with IHE-K including discussion about whether it is necessary to have a separate profile for different transport methods.
  
−
Item 7: Ioana summarized the work conducted on Detailed Clinical Model (DCM) and noted that this complements the ICE-PAC work led by Tracy.  
+
Item 7: Detailed Clinical Model (DCM): Ioana summarized the work and noted that this complements the ICE-PAC work led by Tracy.  
  
−
Item 8: Jeff Rinda noted that the minor issues were raised by BCMA vendors, and he expressed pleasure with their engagement in the process.
+
Item 8: Supplements, CPs: Jeff Rinda noted that the minor issues were raised by BCMA vendors, and he expressed pleasure with their engagement in the process.
  
−
Item 9: Axel Wirth, Symantec, offered to help move security forward by leading the development of a white paper. Todd will send a call for participation.
+
Item 9: Medical Device Security WP: Axel Wirth, Symantec, offered to help move security forward by leading the development of a white paper.  
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Action(s):'''
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 4
 
−
| '''AAMI-Mini Showcase''' <br>- Manny
 
−
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
−
:*
 
−
 
 
−
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Action(s):'''
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 5
 
−
| '''yyy''' <br>-
 
−
 
 
−
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
−
:*
 
−
 
 
−
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
−
:*
 
−
'''Action(s):'''
 
−
:*
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 118: Line 89:
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* 71:
+
:* TF: Change to Sept 15.
−
:* 72:  
+
:* 66.1: John G: He will develop a process for branching from the OID and it will become part of NIST Tooling, with each profile having a leaf.
−
:* 78:  
+
:* 66.2: John G: NISt is continuing the effort.
−
:* 86:
+
:* 77: Close as completed.
−
:* 92:  
+
:* 82: John will integrate 66.1 and 82.
−
:* 93:  
+
:* 83: MOVE TO PC.
−
:* 10x:  
+
:* 87: MOVE FROM ACTIVE
 +
:* 89: Close as completed
 +
:* 92: Grouped Actors: Close as addressed by removing this as potentially available to PIB. PIB will become a suggestion or reference to PAM,
 +
:* PDQ that are separate and distinct ITI profiles.
 +
:* 93: John R has received approval to use GForge. Change date to ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬____
 +
:* 94: Close
 +
:* 96: Close in favor of Patient Device Association addressing this issue.
 +
:* OPEN new item to obtain all ADT support required. PAM, PDQ, PEC.
 +
:* OPEN new item for PDA with possible interim document.
 +
:* 97: Move date
 +
:* 98: close???
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 141: Line 122:
 
:*  
 
:*  
  
−
|-
+
'''
−
| align="center" | 8
 
−
| '''xyz''' <br>-
 
−
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
−
:*
 
−
 
 
−
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Action(s):'''
 
  
  

Revision as of 14:00, 10 July 2010

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly Scheduled TC Meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Technical Committee Meeting

Regularly Scheduled Meeting


Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

  1. Agenda Approval
  2. Review Discussion Summaries: June 16 PCD TC 2010-06-16 Webex
  3. DPI and collaboration with ICE
  4. AAMI 2010 Update: Presentations, Mini-Showcase
  5. Review AAMI Mini-Showcase Event in Tampa
  6. IHE Korea Connectathon & ITI WS* Testing Support
  7. Detailed Clinical Model (DCM) Update
  8. Supplements, CPs
  9. Medical Device Security WP
  10. Action Item Review
  11. Additional Business
  12. Next Meetings

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Participants

Chair: Todd Cooper, John Rhoads
Jon Blasingame, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Sarah Hopkins, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Ioana Singureanu, Erin Sparnon, Greg Scott, Axel Wirth, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
- As Noted 		Status/Discussion:

Item 3: DPI and ICE: Discussion continues related to concepts and developing the plan of action.

Items 4, 5: Todd summarized PCD activities at AAMI. The Saturday morning AAMI Symposium focused on Meaningful Use was well received. PCD was well represented by Jon, Elliot. Steve, Ken, Todd and Elliot presented an update on PCD on Monday, and the demonstration was also well received. Manny and Ken described the recruiting effort and noted that MEM should be able to begin work on messages, and that at least one device vendor appeared strongly interested. John summarized the discussion with AAMI leadership that took place on Saturday.

Item 6: IHE Korea Connectathon & ITI WS* Testing Support: Todd summarized activity with IHE-K including discussion about whether it is necessary to have a separate profile for different transport methods.

Item 7: Detailed Clinical Model (DCM): Ioana summarized the work and noted that this complements the ICE-PAC work led by Tracy.

Item 8: Supplements, CPs: Jeff Rinda noted that the minor issues were raised by BCMA vendors, and he expressed pleasure with their engagement in the process.

Item 9: Medical Device Security WP: Axel Wirth, Symantec, offered to help move security forward by leading the development of a white paper.

6 Action Items
- Chairs 		Status/Discussion:
  • TF: Change to Sept 15.
  • 66.1: John G: He will develop a process for branching from the OID and it will become part of NIST Tooling, with each profile having a leaf.
  • 66.2: John G: NISt is continuing the effort.
  • 77: Close as completed.
  • 82: John will integrate 66.1 and 82.
  • 83: MOVE TO PC.
  • 87: MOVE FROM ACTIVE
  • 89: Close as completed
  • 92: Grouped Actors: Close as addressed by removing this as potentially available to PIB. PIB will become a suggestion or reference to PAM,
  • PDQ that are separate and distinct ITI profiles.
  • 93: John R has received approval to use GForge. Change date to ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬____
  • 94: Close
  • 96: Close in favor of Patient Device Association addressing this issue.
  • OPEN new item to obtain all ADT support required. PAM, PDQ, PEC.
  • OPEN new item for PDA with possible interim document.
  • 97: Move date
  • 98: close???

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

7 Announcements
- All 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next meeting will be July 14 PCD TC 2010-07-14 Webex

PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_TC_2010-06-30_Webex&oldid=43344"