PCD DPI 2009-08-20 WebEx: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m Corrected Initial Version |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Proposed Agenda == | == Proposed Agenda == | ||
:0. Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06]] | :0. Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06]] | ||
:1. White Paper Review | :1. DPI Profile in PCD Technical Framework Model Review | ||
: | :2. DPI White Paper Draft Review | ||
: | :3. ICE Appendix Review | ||
:4. HITSP Appendix Review | |||
:5. Planning / Next Session | |||
== Attachments / Materials == | == Attachments / Materials == | ||
| Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
:'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | :'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | ||
:'''Participants:''' | :'''Participants:''' Jon Blasingame (Philips), John Garguilo (NIST), Kai Hassing (Philips), Gary Meyer (CareFusion), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH) | ||
=== Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| Line 53: | Line 56: | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* Agenda | :* Agenda reviewed & modified to focus on the DPI WP discussion slide set. | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 62: | Line 65: | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* Reviewed and approved | :* Reviewed and approved [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx#Discussion_Notes | 2009.08.06 Discussion Notes]] | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 3 | | align="center" | 3 | ||
| ''' | | '''DPI WP Discussion Slide Set Review''' <br>- Group | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* Initial review of the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/WP/PCD_DPI_WP_Discussion_r1.ppt DPI WP Discussion Slide Set (6.5MB!)] | |||
:::Note: Discussion comments added to slide set in "real-time" | |||
:* Question: What is the relationship between home health / Continua and the DPI efforts? (Garguilo) | |||
::: DPI materials have always included home health contexts (e.g., [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2009April/Handouts/HIMSS09_IHE-PCD-DPI-DoorPoster-Handout-Ovw_v3d.pdf see Wittenber IHE Showcase '09 presentation, Slide #2]) | |||
::: The primary IHE PCD and DPI focus is on professional / clinical health care vs. personal / home health. | |||
::: The DPI WP will reflect this focus. For example, the initial DPI profiles & roadmap will focus on clinical scenarios, while at the same time ensuring extension to home contexts as necessary and applicable. | |||
:* ICE Draft Review (Rhoads) | |||
:::- John provided a review of drafting work he has done on the "ICE" Appendix. | |||
:::- Main message should be: '''''DPI supports ICE architectures, starting at the lowest connectivity levels''''' | |||
:::- Audience may not have a clue about ICE, so the section should start with a brief overview & references | |||
:::- The Appendix should include: | |||
:::::> ICE Overview / Backgrounder | |||
:::::> ICE-PAC Overview, process review & sample analyses | |||
:::::> Specific requirements for the IHE PCD TF, especially DPI profiles | |||
:::::> Roadmap discussion, correlating with the main Roadmap section earlier in the document | |||
:::- Given the potential size of the ICE-related material, this section should provide only general information to achieve the main objective (stated above) and should defer more detailed treatment of the ICE-PAC material to a White Paper or other such document. '''''The main purpose of this WP is DPI, not ICE''''' - so balance in the amount of material should be maintained, while at the same time clearly pointing to the integration of the two efforts. | |||
:::- ICE will be mentioned earlier in the document, esp. in the clinical contexts section and the architectures discussion. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 89: | Line 113: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* Next meeting: | :* Next meeting: Thursday, 2009.08.27 | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 97: | Line 121: | ||
=== Next Meeting === | === Next Meeting === | ||
''NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: | ''NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-27_WebEx | 2009.08.27]] (120 minutes ... max!)'' | ||
| Line 106: | Line 130: | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD_DPI]] | [[Category:PCD_DPI]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 17 May 2010
(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 120 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06
- 1. DPI Profile in PCD Technical Framework Model Review
- 2. DPI White Paper Draft Review
- 3. ICE Appendix Review
- 4. HITSP Appendix Review
- 5. Planning / Next Session
Attachments / Materials
- (No attachments for this meeting)
Discussion Notes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Participants: Jon Blasingame (Philips), John Garguilo (NIST), Kai Hassing (Philips), Gary Meyer (CareFusion), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda reviewed & modified to focus on the DPI WP discussion slide set.
Action(s):
2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Reviewed and approved 2009.08.06 Discussion Notes
Action(s):
3 DPI WP Discussion Slide Set Review
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Initial review of the DPI WP Discussion Slide Set (6.5MB!)
- Note: Discussion comments added to slide set in "real-time"
- Question: What is the relationship between home health / Continua and the DPI efforts? (Garguilo)
- DPI materials have always included home health contexts (e.g., see Wittenber IHE Showcase '09 presentation, Slide #2)
- The primary IHE PCD and DPI focus is on professional / clinical health care vs. personal / home health.
- The DPI WP will reflect this focus. For example, the initial DPI profiles & roadmap will focus on clinical scenarios, while at the same time ensuring extension to home contexts as necessary and applicable.
- ICE Draft Review (Rhoads)
- - John provided a review of drafting work he has done on the "ICE" Appendix.
- - Main message should be: DPI supports ICE architectures, starting at the lowest connectivity levels
- - Audience may not have a clue about ICE, so the section should start with a brief overview & references
- - The Appendix should include:
- > ICE Overview / Backgrounder
- > ICE-PAC Overview, process review & sample analyses
- > Specific requirements for the IHE PCD TF, especially DPI profiles
- > Roadmap discussion, correlating with the main Roadmap section earlier in the document
- - Given the potential size of the ICE-related material, this section should provide only general information to achieve the main objective (stated above) and should defer more detailed treatment of the ICE-PAC material to a White Paper or other such document. The main purpose of this WP is DPI, not ICE - so balance in the amount of material should be maintained, while at the same time clearly pointing to the integration of the two efforts.
- - ICE will be mentioned earlier in the document, esp. in the clinical contexts section and the architectures discussion.
Decisions/Issues:Action(s):
4 ...
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting: Thursday, 2009.08.27
Action(s):
Next Meeting
NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.27 (120 minutes ... max!)
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>