PCD DPI 2009-08-20 WebEx

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page


Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG

Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009

Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 120 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06
1. DPI Profile in PCD Technical Framework Model Review
2. DPI White Paper Draft Review
3. ICE Appendix Review
4. HITSP Appendix Review
5. Planning / Next Session

Attachments / Materials

  • (No attachments for this meeting)

Discussion Notes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Participants: Jon Blasingame (Philips), John Garguilo (NIST), Kai Hassing (Philips), Gary Meyer (CareFusion), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH)


Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda reviewed & modified to focus on the DPI WP discussion slide set.

Action(s):

2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 DPI WP Discussion Slide Set Review
- Group
Status/Discussion:
Note: Discussion comments added to slide set in "real-time"
  • Question: What is the relationship between home health / Continua and the DPI efforts? (Garguilo)
DPI materials have always included home health contexts (e.g., see Wittenber IHE Showcase '09 presentation, Slide #2)
The primary IHE PCD and DPI focus is on professional / clinical health care vs. personal / home health.
The DPI WP will reflect this focus. For example, the initial DPI profiles & roadmap will focus on clinical scenarios, while at the same time ensuring extension to home contexts as necessary and applicable.
  • ICE Draft Review (Rhoads)
- John provided a review of drafting work he has done on the "ICE" Appendix.
- Main message should be: DPI supports ICE architectures, starting at the lowest connectivity levels
- Audience may not have a clue about ICE, so the section should start with a brief overview & references
- The Appendix should include:
> ICE Overview / Backgrounder
> ICE-PAC Overview, process review & sample analyses
> Specific requirements for the IHE PCD TF, especially DPI profiles
> Roadmap discussion, correlating with the main Roadmap section earlier in the document
- Given the potential size of the ICE-related material, this section should provide only general information to achieve the main objective (stated above) and should defer more detailed treatment of the ICE-PAC material to a White Paper or other such document. The main purpose of this WP is DPI, not ICE - so balance in the amount of material should be maintained, while at the same time clearly pointing to the integration of the two efforts.
- ICE will be mentioned earlier in the document, esp. in the clinical contexts section and the architectures discussion.


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 ...
- Group
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


5 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting: Thursday, 2009.08.27

Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.27 (120 minutes ... max!)


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>


PCD Home