PCD DPI 2008-10-02 WebEx: Difference between revisions
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m →Discussion: Converted "raw" text to formatted text |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
:* Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs. | :* Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs. | ||
:* 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document. | :* 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document. | ||
:* "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems. | :* "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems. | ||
:* DPI WP Front Matter... | |||
:::- Scope: Differentiate DPI vs. DEC | |||
DPI | :::- Audience: IHE TF developers | ||
:::- IHE PCD TF: Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's | |||
:::- Regulatory Considerations: Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight. | |||
:* Use Cases: There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them | |||
:* Topological Model (leading from the use cases) | |||
:* PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers) | |||
:* Technological Archittecture... | |||
:::- Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model | |||
:::- Peer-to-peer communication | |||
:::- Network Manager / Agent | |||
:* DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items) | |||
:* Anticipated IHE documents... | |||
:::- White Papers | |||
:::- Users Handbook | |||
:* Service Components | |||
:::- Device Reporting | |||
:::- Device configuration (simple control) | |||
:::- "Symmetric" communciation (device as client) | |||
:::- External Control... | |||
:::: Basic PnP control | |||
:::: Safety Interlocks | |||
:::: "Simple" non-therapeutic Control | |||
:::: Therapeutic controls | |||
:::: Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract") | |||
:* ?ICE Supervisor function? | |||
:* ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval") | |||
:* Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 156: | Line 149: | ||
'' | '''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)''''' | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:38, 24 January 2009
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG
Date: Monday, October 2, 2008
Time: 10:30, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)
Duration: 90 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1 DPI Status Review
- 2 WebEx Planning
- 3 F2F Planning
- 4 White Paper Outline
- 5 Open discussion
Attachments / Materials
(no minutes were reviewed in this meeting)
Minutes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: No agenda was published. The group decided on the agenda listed above.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
2 Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: No minutes were reviewed Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 Discussion & F2F Planning
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).
Decisions/Issues:
- The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.
Action(s):
- (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
- (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.
4 DPI White Paper Outline
- ToddStatus/Discussion: The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper. The following content was suggested:
- Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
- 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
- "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
- DPI WP Front Matter...
- - Scope: Differentiate DPI vs. DEC
- - Audience: IHE TF developers
- - IHE PCD TF: Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's
- - Regulatory Considerations: Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight.
- Use Cases: There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them
- Topological Model (leading from the use cases)
- PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers)
- Technological Archittecture...
- - Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model
- - Peer-to-peer communication
- - Network Manager / Agent
- DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items)
- Anticipated IHE documents...
- - White Papers
- - Users Handbook
- Service Components
- - Device Reporting
- - Device configuration (simple control)
- - "Symmetric" communciation (device as client)
- - External Control...
- Basic PnP control
- Safety Interlocks
- "Simple" non-therapeutic Control
- Therapeutic controls
- Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
- ?ICE Supervisor function?
- ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval")
- Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview
Decisions/Issues:
- The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
- The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
Action(s):
- (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline & process by 2008.10.05
- (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.
5 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:
- DPI Wireless Architecture
- White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
- 4th session topic TBD
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
6 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting will be scheduled for Thursday 2008.10.09
Action(s):
Next Meeting
Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 2008-10-09 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)