PCD DPI 2008-10-09 WebEx: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m →Proposed Agenda: Updated |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | :'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | ||
: | : Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips) | ||
=== Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* . | :* Reviewed & Approved Agenda | ||
:'''''NOTE: The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.''''' | |||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 81: | Line 83: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* ... | :* Approved minutes from ... | ||
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-12_WebEx | 2008.09.12 (Pre-Vancouver)]] | |||
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-22_WebEx | 2008.09.22 (Post-Vancouver)]] | |||
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-02_WebEx | 2008.10.02]] | |||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 88: | Line 94: | ||
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | | '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* ... | :* Action items were reviewed. | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | |||
'''Action(s):''' | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 4 | |||
| '''DPI F2F Review''' <br>- Todd | |||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | |||
:* Reviewed the schedule & agenda for the [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-23_to_24_F2F#Preliminary_Agenda_Topics | DPI F2F 2008.10.23 & 24]]. | |||
:* Agenda topics updated accordingly. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | |||
:* Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope. | |||
:* Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups. | |||
'''Action(s):''' | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 5 | |||
| '''DPI Scope Discussion''' <br>- Group | |||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | |||
:* Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition. Todd indicated that... | |||
:::- In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration | |||
:::- It did involve device direct plug-and-play links | |||
:* The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope. These shall be inlcuded in the white paper. NOTE: Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them. In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | |||
'''Action(s):''' | |||
:* (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session. | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 6 | |||
| '''General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion''' <br>- Group | |||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | |||
:* Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts: | |||
:::- Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network? | |||
:::- Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices? | |||
:* QUESTION: Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration? | |||
:* Use Case: | |||
:::- Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device | |||
:::- Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ... | |||
:::- Includes non-PCD profiles | |||
:* Use Case: RTLS & MEM | |||
:* Use Case: Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ... | |||
:* Use Case: Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic) | |||
:* ICE & DPI: | |||
:::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI | |||
:::- ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI | |||
:::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE) | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* | :* White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion). | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
:* ... | :* (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | 7 | ||
| ''' | | '''DPI Recruitment''' <br>- Todd | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* . | :* Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule. | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
:* (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | 8 | ||
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | | '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
| Line 122: | Line 179: | ||
'' | :'''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)''''' | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 24 January 2009
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008
Time: 10:00, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)
Duration: 90 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1 Approve Minutes from previous session
- 2 Review Action Items
- 3 FTP & wiki Site Review
- 4 F2F Preparation
- Thursday & Friday Participants
- Agenda Topics
- 5 PCD Profile Relationships
- Device Specializations vs. Transaction
- PnP & "Transaction Packages" (see MDCIG Demo II Document)
- 7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston
- DPI White Paper
- DPI-PnP
- DPI-xyz?
- Device Specialization: Physio Monitor, Vent, ...
- 8 DPI White Paper Outline (Drafting)
- Major Sections
- Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation
- Framework of PCD Profiles
- ...
- 9 Planning / Recruitment
- Topics for next week's discussion sessions:
Attachments / Materials
Minutes for approval:
Minutes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Reviewed & Approved Agenda
- NOTE: The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.
Action(s):
2 Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Approved minutes from ...
Action(s):3 Action Items Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - Action items were reviewed.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 DPI F2F Review
- ToddStatus/Discussion: - Reviewed the schedule & agenda for the DPI F2F 2008.10.23 & 24.
- Agenda topics updated accordingly.
Decisions/Issues:
- Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope.
- Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups.
Action(s):
5 DPI Scope Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition. Todd indicated that...
- - In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration
- - It did involve device direct plug-and-play links
- The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope. These shall be inlcuded in the white paper. NOTE: Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them. In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session.
6 General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts:
- - Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network?
- - Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices?
- QUESTION: Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration?
- Use Case:
- - Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device
- - Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ...
- - Includes non-PCD profiles
- Use Case: RTLS & MEM
- Use Case: Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ...
- Use Case: Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic)
- ICE & DPI:
- - ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI
- - ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI
- - ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE)
Decisions/Issues:
- White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion).
Action(s):
- (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases.
7 DPI Recruitment
- ToddStatus/Discussion: - Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities.
8 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting will be scheduled for Monday 2008.10.13
Action(s):
Next Meeting
Next meeting scheduled for Monday, 2008-10-13 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern
- (Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)