PCD DPI 2008-10-02 WebEx: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
ToddCooper (talk | contribs)
1,843 edits
Efurst (talk | contribs)
editor
8,826 edits
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)


: '''<tbd>'''
: Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips)


=== Discussion ===  
=== Discussion ===  
Line 50: Line 50:
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
No agenda was published.  The group decided on the agenda listed above.
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* ...


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
Line 57: Line 58:
| align="center" | 2
| align="center" | 2
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:''' No minutes were reviewed
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* ...


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
|-
|-
| align="center" | 3
| align="center" | 3
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Discussion & F2F Planning''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* ...
:* The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* ...
:* The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:* ...
:* (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
:* (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.


|-
|-
| align="center" | 4
| align="center" | 4
| '''xyz''' <br>- Todd
| '''DPI White Paper Outline''' <br>- Todd
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* ...
The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper.  The following content was suggested:
:* Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
:* 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document:  This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
:* "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements:  The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
:* DPI WP Front Matter...
:::- Scope:  Differentiate DPI vs. DEC
:::- Audience:  IHE TF developers
:::- IHE PCD TF:  Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's
:::- Regulatory Considerations:  Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight.
:* Use Cases:  There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them
:* Topological Model (leading from the use cases)
:* PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers)
:* Technological Archittecture...
:::- Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model
:::- Peer-to-peer communication
:::- Network Manager / Agent
:* DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items)
:* Anticipated IHE documents...
:::- White Papers
:::- Users Handbook
:* Service Components
:::- Device Reporting
:::- Device configuration (simple control)
:::- "Symmetric" communciation (device as client)
:::- External Control...
:::: Basic PnP control
:::: Safety Interlocks
:::: "Simple" non-therapeutic Control
:::: Therapeutic controls
:::: Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
:* ?ICE Supervisor function?
:* ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval")
:* Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
:* The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:* (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline  & process by 2008.10.05
:* (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.


|-
|-
| align="center" | n
| align="center" | 5
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:
:* DPI Wireless Architecture
:* White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
:* 4th session topic TBD
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
|-
| align="center" | 6
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Line 100: Line 149:




''<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">''
'''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)'''''




[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 12:38, 24 January 2009

(DPI Profile Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG

Date: Monday, October 2, 2008

Time: 10:30, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 DPI Status Review
2 WebEx Planning
3 F2F Planning
4 White Paper Outline
5 Open discussion

Attachments / Materials

(no minutes were reviewed in this meeting)

Minutes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips)

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

No agenda was published. The group decided on the agenda listed above.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

2 Approval of Minutes
- Chair 		Status/Discussion: No minutes were reviewed

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Discussion & F2F Planning
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).

Decisions/Issues:

  • The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
  • (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.
4 DPI White Paper Outline
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:

The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper. The following content was suggested:

  • Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
  • 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
  • "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
  • DPI WP Front Matter...
- Scope: Differentiate DPI vs. DEC
- Audience: IHE TF developers
- IHE PCD TF: Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's
- Regulatory Considerations: Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight.
  • Use Cases: There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them
  • Topological Model (leading from the use cases)
  • PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers)
  • Technological Archittecture...
- Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model
- Peer-to-peer communication
- Network Manager / Agent
  • DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items)
  • Anticipated IHE documents...
- White Papers
- Users Handbook
  • Service Components
- Device Reporting
- Device configuration (simple control)
- "Symmetric" communciation (device as client)
- External Control...
Basic PnP control
Safety Interlocks
"Simple" non-therapeutic Control
Therapeutic controls
Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
  • ?ICE Supervisor function?
  • ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval")
  • Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview

Decisions/Issues:

  • The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
  • The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline & process by 2008.10.05
  • (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.
5 Next Meeting
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:

  • DPI Wireless Architecture
  • White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
  • 4th session topic TBD

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Next Meeting
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting will be scheduled for Thursday 2008.10.09

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 2008-10-09 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)


PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_DPI_2008-10-02_WebEx&oldid=29236"