Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group Tcon Minutes 2010-10-25
Attendees
- Chris Carr
- Emmanuel Cordonnier
- Mike Nusbaum
- Kevin O'Donnell
Minutes
- Reviewed ITI Strategic Planning materials (Mike Nusbaum)
- Establishes personal liaisons with other domains and process to communicate
- Other domains can submit work requests to ITI for needs they have
- Breaks committee work into key themes and tracks profile development work in each theme area
- Reviewed Process and IHE Profile Design Principles and Conventions wiki pages (Kevin O'Donnell)
- Education Materials, Wiki Pages intended to guide technical framework development processes
- The ways committees develop profiles has diverged--How to fix?
- Document and ask compliance?
- Establish liaison relationships (with ITI; among all domains)
- Establish oversight group (like DICOM WG6, HL7 Architecture Review Board)
- Could be multiple review groups, each one based on different base standards (this could cause more "silo" issues)
- Early cross-domain or central review of proposed work items?
- Strategic review of overall existing inventory of profiles at domain level and identify gaps/redundancies
- Identification of Problems
- Uniformity of process across committees
- Coordination of committee work items
- Coordination work between ITI and clinical specialties
- Coordination among clinical specialties (liaison between all committees
- Potential Solutions for problem #1
- Enhance education materials and process, including Wiki, Webinars and templates
- Establish oversight body to enforce compliance (peer volunteer group or executive/expert review board)
- Potential Solutions for problem #2
- Expand domain liaison relationships to link specialties and ITI
- Require early, substantive cross-domain review of supplement work proposals (could use Domain Coordination Committee)
- Perform strategic review of existing portfolio of profiles and identify gaps and overlap (for possible consolidation)