ITI Change Proposals 2009

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 07:33, 24 June 2009 by Witting (talk | contribs) (→Agenda)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

The ITI CP process follows the general IHE CP process described on the Change Proposal process page. The following sections give more detail on the general process for ITI participants involved in the CP process.

The ITI specific CP Process

The following text explains what the process used by the ITI commitee in processing submitted CPs. It is consistent with the general IHE CP process and is informative only.

  1. Submission into the Incoming directory. This is typically done via an email to the ITI Technical Committee co-chair in charge of CPs (currently Karen Witting) or by directly updating the directory if you have access to the ftp write password.
  2. First consideration by the committee. If CP is accepted it is given a CP #, assigned an editor, renamed to CP-ITI-xxx-00.doc and placed in Assigned. If CP is rejected it is moved to Rejected and submitter is informed of explanation for rejection. Likely reasons for rejection are: duplicate, merged, withdrawn or not enough information to understand the request. Rejected CPs can be resubmitted with more information for reconsideration.
  3. Committee works with editor to draft the CP. Versions are kept in Assigned directory and numbered -00, -01, -02, etc.
  4. Committee decides CP is ready for ballot. Latest version of CP is moved to Completed diretory and old versions are moved to old_versions.
  5. Co-chair collects Completed CPs into a ballot. The Ballot directory will be used for this.
  6. Ballot is released to the general community for voting
  7. Votes and comments are collected. All yes votes means the CP passed ballot and moved to FinalText. No votes are resolved by the committee. Sometimes CP is withdrawn, sometimes NO voter changes to yes vote after explanations. CP may be updated in this process. If updates are insignificant (clarification only) the CP is considered passed. If updates are significant the CP is submitted for another ballot.
  8. CP approved in ballot are put in FinalText and scheduled to be integrated into the Technical Framework or Supplement.

Directory Structure

As CPs are processed through various statuses they move from one directory to another. The directories invoved are:

Assigned
contains CPs that have been assigned an editor and are being actively worked on by the committee, i.e. Assigned status
Ballots
contains Ballots that have been released for voting by the general community
Canceled
contains CPs that have been canceled, i.e. Canceled status
Completed
contains the last version of a CP that is in Completed status. It is waiting to be put in a ballot
FinalText
contains the last version of a CP that is in FinalText status. It is has been approved by ballot and is waiting to be integrated into the TF.
FinalText/Integrated
contains the version of the CP that was integrated into the TF.
Incoming
contains CPs which have been submitted but have not been assigned a CP number or an editor. This is the place that new incoming CPs are placed prior to the first stage of processing by the committee.
old_versions
Contains old versions of Completed and FinalText CPs
Rejected
CPs that have been submitted by rejected by the committee
Status
contains spreadsheets describing the status of CPs.

Archived Change Proposal pages

Ongoing work on CPs is placed on the current year CP page. Prior years work can be accessed at:

ITI CP Tracking

All Change Propoposal management is in ITI CP ftp site. The tracking spreadsheet can be accessed at Status directory. It is the file with the most recent date in that directory.

Integrated CPs

These CPs have been integrated into the Version 5.0 of the Technical Framework and the 2008 version of Supplements.

CP Title Profiles Affected Date
TBD TBD TBD TBD


Final Text CPs

These CPs are ready for integration into the Technical Framework and Supplements.

CP Title Profiles Affected
296 Improve Submission Set Description XDS
318 Query Example Typo XDS.a
359 XDS document relations in a single submission set XDS
379 Profile dependencies (grouping) inconsistencies Many
380 BPPC Patient Patient Privacy Enforcement option is missing for the Integ. Doc Source / Rep actor BPPC, XDS.a, XDS.b
381 homeCommunityId needs definitition in metadata tables XCA, XDS.b
382 Clarify HL7 v2 Z-Segment Usage Statement Appendix
384 Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message XCA, NAV
387 Remove central from definition of PDQ PDQ, PDQV3
388 Unclear what error should result when Retrieve Document Set specifies an unknown uniqueID XDS.b
390 Document Registry is mentioned in PDO, but no rqmts in Vol 1 material PDO
392 SNTP reference CT
394 XCA and XDS.b ATNA Logging Enhancements XDS.b, XCA
396 XDS-SD Duplicate Option XDS-SD

Completed CPs

Ballot 1 CPs

Note: All CPs passed ballot and are reflected in the Final Text table.

CP Title Profiles Affected
296 Improve Submission Set Description XDS
318 Query Example Typo XDS.a
359 XDS document relations in a single submission set XDS
379 Profile dependencies (grouping) inconsistencies Many
380 BPPC Patient Patient Privacy Enforcement option is missing for the Integ. Doc Source / Rep actor BPPC, XDS.a, XDS.b
381 homeCommunityId needs definitition in metadata tables XCA, XDS.b
382 Clarify HL7 v2 Z-Segment Usage Statement Appendix
384 Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message XCA, NAV
387 Remove central from definition of PDQ PDQ, PDQV3
388 Unclear what error should result when Retrieve Document Set specifies an unknown uniqueID XDS.b
390 Document Registry is mentioned in PDO, but no rqmts in Vol 1 material PDO
392 SNTP reference CT
394 XCA and XDS.b ATNA Logging Enhancements XDS.b, XCA
396 XDS-SD Duplicate Option XDS-SD

Ballot 2 CPs

CP Title Profiles Affected
188 XDSFolder.codelist inconsistent XDS
259 parentDocumentRelationship (parentDocumentId) is unclear XDS
316 Clarify Method to Uniquely Identify AuthorInstitutions in Registry Stored Query Response XDS
361 New Stored Query XDS
363 Web Services Parameter Nomenclature Appendix V
365 Required/optional attributes in PWP PWP
383 XCA return home in error messages XCA
395 Adding FolderId information into NAV message NAV
397 Clarification on NAV sendAcknowledgementTo NAV
399 DSG title page DSG
404 ATNA ParticipantObjectDetail use not well-defined ATNA
409 Handling of Coded Stored Query Parameters XDS
410 Address XCA Responding Gateway which does not support all XDS Registry concepts XCA
411 XCA Responding Gateway Asychnronous Requirement XCA
415 XDS Stored Queries of non-patient returning different patients XDS
416 Query response for unknown patient id shall be empty list XDS
421 Volume 2 is too big for effective editing None
423 generalize some XDS actors XDS
425 typeCode missing on FindDocuments SQ XDS, XCA
426 XDS.a deprecation XDS

Assigned CPs

CPs to be addressed in whitepaper or supplement

Organized by technical area

XDS

XDM/XDR

  • XDM
    • CP-ITI-356-00.doc Rob: XDM – Metadata file digitally signed
      • 3/4 plan to discuss March 18
    • CP-ITI-368-00.doc Rob: SMTP clarifications for XDS.a and XDM
      • 3/4 plan to discuss March 18
  • XDR
    • CP-ITI-377-00.doc Charles: XDR Doc Recipient not documented in ITI-41
      • 1/29 waiting for Charles to write up

XCA

  • XCA
    • CP-ITI-383-03.doc Karen: XCA return home in error messages
      • 3/18 revised version based on discussion
    • CP-ITI-410-01.doc Karen: Address XCA Responding Gateway which does not support all XDS Registry concepts
    • CP-ITI-411-00.doc Karen: XCA Responding Gateway Asychnronous Requirement
      • Ready for review
    • CP-ITI-363-03.doc Karen: Web Services Parameter Nomenclature
      • 1/29 plan to discuss April 29

Security/Privacy

NAV

    • CP-ITI-395-01.doc Rob: Adding FolderId information into NAV message
      • 3/4 plan to discuss March 18
    • CP-ITI-397-00.doc Lynn: Clarification on NAV sendAcknowledgementTo
      • 3/4 plan to discuss March 18

PIX/PDQ

  • PIX/PDQ V2
    • CP-ITI-211-03.doc Yongjian: PIX/PAM Integration
      • Being addressed through the HL7 task force re-write of Appendix C
    • CP-ITI-307-00.doc Vassil: PDQ Continuation Protocol in One Socket or Multiple Sockets
      • 1/29 Will be integrated into the Appendix C re-write
  • PIX/PDQ V3
    • CP-ITI-308-00.doc Vassil: PDQv3 specify what fuzzy search means
      • 1/29 plan to discuss April 15
    • CP-ITI-310-00.doc Vassil: Assign profile #s to PIXV3 and PDQV3
      • 1/29 Plan to discuss March 18
    • CP-ITI-364-00.doc Vassil: Make query continuations optional
      • 1/29 plan to discuss April 15
    • CP-ITI-376-00.doc Vassil: extend PIXV3/PDQV3 R-MIM
      • 1/29 plan to discuss April 15
  • PDO
    • CP-ITI-391-00.doc Alean: What does R2 mean for a PIX Manager
      • 1/27 Direction discussed, Alean to write up text
    • CP-ITI-400-00.doc Alean: Last Update Date/Time for v3 msgs with PDO option

Agenda and Minutes from CP discussions

July 16, 2009

Agenda

TBD

Minutes

TBD

July 14, 2009

Agenda

TBD

Minutes

TBD

June 24, 2009

Agenda

  • Review status of CPs at Ballot2Response-combined.v2.xls
  • Review editor assignments
    • Vol. 1 - George
    • Vol. 2 - Manuel
    • Async - Teddy (no CPs)
    • XCA - Karen Witting
    • XDR - No CPs
    • XDS.b - Teddy
    • DRR - No Cps
    • DSG - Need editor (399)
    • NAV - Need editor (384,395,397)
    • PIX PDQv3 - Vassil Peytchev
    • PDO - Aleane Kirnak
    • RFD - George Cole (re-release)
    • SVS - Ana Estelrich (no CPs)

Minutes

TBD

June 17, 2009

Agenda

  • 308-01
  • 310-01

Minutes

  • 376 - work has begun, will be complete this week for review at f2f
  • 308 - reviewed text. Turn off change tracking. New version 03 ready for ballot.
  • 310 - assigned profile #s 23 for PIXV3 and 24 for PDQV3 version 02 to be checked by Karen then ready for ballot
  • 364 - Reviewed proposal. Agreed on the approach, next step is to finish edits reflecting the approach. Review at f2f.
  • CP-ITI-PMA_ATNA_ITI14_SourceUserIDNotSpezialised.doc - Assign 427 to Rob
  • CP-ITI-PMA_ATNA_ITI17_Repository-Consumer_documentUniqueID.doc - Assign 428 to Rob
  • CP-ITI-PMA_ATNA_ITI18_Consumer_HomeCommunityIDCannotBeSetInTheDefinedWay.doc - Assign 429 to Rob
  • CP-ITI-PMA_ATNA_ITI8_PIXManager_InaccurateDefinitionOfValuesOfParticipantObjectDetail.doc and CP-ITI-PMA_ATNA_ITI9_PIXManager_UndefinedFieldParticipantObjectID.doc - Combined these two into one CP 430 to Rob
  • CP_ITI_LF_incorrect_option_reference.doc - Assign to Lynn 431
  • CP_ITI_LF_clarify_NAV_dependency.doc - Recommend removing the dependency, no required grouping exists. Assign to Lynn 432.

May 19, 2009

Agenda

  • 425-01
  • 409-04
  • 316-06
  • 361-03
  • 421-02
  • 416-01

Minutes

  • 425
    • Reviewed approach, agreed
    • Fixed some typos
    • add sledgehammer sentence regarding that if scheme is missing the code will match for all schema
    • After changes discussed during the call ready for ballot
  • 409
    • delete description of code/scheme around line 3685 in TF V2
    • small edits to existing text
    • After changes discussed during the call ready for ballot
  • 316
    • Discussed a plan for moving forward.
    • Reassign to Mark
    • New version to be distributed tomorrow to ititech, Sarah, Rob, Vassil to review and unless disagreement, put in ballot
  • 361-03
    • Ready for ballot
  • 421-02
    • Ready for ballot
  • 416-01
    • Ready for ballot
  • Deprecate XDS.a
    • Reviewed proposal from Lynn, minor changes, updated version to be put in ballot
  • Scheduled calls for June/July:
    • June 17 10-12 hl7 v3 cps
    • June 24 9-11 Outcome of CP ballot and planning for CP integration
    • July 7 1:30-3 Integration discussion

May 18, 2009

Agenda


See minutes

Minutes

  • 259-02
    • Discuss removing sections, agreed, ready for ballot
  • 409-02
    • formatCode is missing coding scheme
    • created 425: 1. will add typeCode using existing approach 2. add scheme for formatCode 3. Enhance note to describe consequences of not having scheme
    • 409 will reflect only converting to use CE format for code and remove scheme
  • 314
    • Folder White paper will address the collection of use cases as a starting point - this use case will be considered in that work. Change status to be addressed in Folder White Paper
  • 422
    • Cancel - no need to specify for registry - doesn't help interoperability
  • 316
    • Defer to tomorrow as appropriate people not available today
  • 352
    • Address in Folder and metadata white papers
  • 361
    • Agreed to add multi-patients language and then ready for ballot.
  • 421-01
    • Include update to section 2.1 describing the multiple volumes
    • Add description of what should be on the TF page
    • Review tomorrow

May 6-7, 2009

Agenda


  • CPs ready to discussion
  • Incoming
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • CP-ITI-KW-Volume_2_too_big-00.doc
    • cp-iti-bill-finddoc_typecode.doc
    • cp-iti-bill-sq_err_resp.doc
    • CP-ITI-DocConsumer_Defined.doc
    • CP-ITI-XDS_Offline_K6.doc

Minutes

May 6

  • CP-ITI-415-01.doc Bill: XDS Stored Queries of non-patient returning different patients
    • Ready to ballot pending email comments. Comments due May 14.
  • CP-ITI-351-02.doc Bill: Nested Folders
    • Start as a white paper to discuss the concepts. Currently not clear what best direction to go is, so white paper will explore the options.
  • CP-ITI-316-06.doc Bill: Add Unique Identifier Slot for AuthorInstitution in Registry Stored Query Response
    • Details are too difficult to get in to ballot this month, so delay for later
  • CP-ITI-188-02.doc Bill: XDSFolder.codelist inconsistent
    • Relax constraint on XDSFolder.codelist from R to O (or maybe Cg). Suggest putting all codes in, but event and type. After editing re-discuss.
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • Assign 420 to Teddy
  • CP-ITI-409-01.doc Bill: Handling of Coded Stored Query Parameters
    • Discussion of proposal

May 7

  • CP-ITI-188-04.doc Bill: XDSFolder.codelist inconsistent
    • Incorporation of yesterday's comments. Changes approved. Ready for ballot
  • CP-ITI-409-01.doc Bill: Handling of Coded Stored Query Parameters
    • CP reflects a non-compatible change but is important enough to do anyway. Needs to be clear which ones are coded vocabulary and which one just happen to have code in the name (e.g. if it is based on ebRIM vocabulary it is not coded vocabulary). Discussion of the size concern should be enough as coding scheme name tend to be fairly short (30 characters) and codes too (30 characters). It generally takes about 25% of the size. Registry vendors will be given a heads up on it as soon as the editorial is done. Bill to prepare for review at May 18 call.
  • CP-ITI-263-01.doc Bill: XDS Document Relationship Model
    • Cancel - white paper addresses
  • CP-ITI-264-00.doc Bill: Allow the deletion of Documents within XDS
    • Cancel - white paper addresses
  • CP-ITI-KW-Volume_2_too_big-00.doc
    • Assign 421 to Karen
  • cp-iti-bill-finddoc_typecode
    • Merged into 409
  • cp-iti-bill-sq_err_resp.doc
    • Assign 422 partial success is a valid return from stored query
  • CP-ITI-DocConsumer_Defined.doc
    • Ready for ballot 423
  • CP-ITI-XDS_Offline_K6.doc
    • Assign 424 to John


April 29, 2009

Agenda


  • CPs ready to discussion
  • Incoming
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • CP-ITI-KW-Volume_2_too_big-00.doc

Minutes


  • CP-ITI-363-03.doc Karen: Web Services Parameter Nomenclature
    • Ready for ballot.
  • Incoming/CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • Discussed request to usine only on operation name for synchronous and asynchronous. Teddy will document details of need for different operation names and discussion will be continued at the f2f.
  • CP-ITI-400-00.doc Alean: Last Update Date/Time for v3 msgs with PDO option
    • Revise restricted RMIM to reflect the additional Administative Operation for last update time and facility. Dave will write up and review with Vassil.
  • CP-ITI-410-01.doc Karen: Address XCA Responding Gateway which does not support all XDS Registry concepts
    • Add that policy may restrict the sharing of some concepts. Bill will review then ready for ballot.

April 15, 2009

Agenda


  • General CPs
  • PIX/PDQ HL7 V3 CPs
  • Incoming
    • CP-ITI-DGS_AS_DOC_CONTENT.doc
    • CP-ITI-EncodingSha1.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDSb-MetadataTableIssues.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDS-MetadataTableIssues.doc
    • CP-ITI-KW-Volume_2_too_big-00.doc
      • Vol2Breakup.doc
    • CP-ITI-KW-XDS_Invalid_PatientID-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-PCC-ContentProfiles_ATNA.doc
    • CP-ITI-Vol2AppendixL.doc
    • CP-ITI-XDS_multiple_patients_data.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-AsyncAdditionalEPRRecommendation.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-AsyncATNARequirement.doc

Minutes


  • CP-ITI-DGS_AS_DOC_CONTENT.doc
    • Assign to John 412
  • CP-ITI-EncodingSha1.doc
    • Assign to John 413
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-RemoveWsAddressingActionForAsync.doc
    • Defer for a time when Teddy is available to discuss
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDSb-MetadataTableIssues.doc
    • combined with CP-ITI-Forcare-XDS-MetadataTableIssues.doc
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDS-MetadataTableIssues.doc
    • Break into two CPs 1) Removal of query column 2) address repositoryUniqueID & URL whether should be specified in P&R. Assign both to Mark: 418 & 419. Mark will send me modified submissions for assignment to #. Discussed with Bill 1) the Metadata tables formatting information applies to submission and query return. By removing the query column that implication is lost. 2) size & hash should be consisitent, agreed on error being optional for both, but should specify which error. Mark will make appropriate updates.
  • CP-ITI-PCC-ContentProfiles_ATNA-01.doc
    • Added recommendation from ITI and refer to PCC.
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-AsyncAdditionalEPRRecommendation.doc
    • Material is appropriate for implementation guide in the wiki. Reject.
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-AsyncATNARequirement.doc
    • Reject, implied by Secure Node / Secure Application.
  • CP-ITI-Vol2AppendixL.doc
    • Assign to John 414.
  • CP-ITI-XDS_multiple_patients_data.doc
    • Assign to Bill 415.
  • CP-ITI-KW-XDS_Invalid_PatientID-00.doc
    • Assign to Karen 416.
  • CP-ITI-ATNA-SYSLOG.doc
    • Assign to John 417.
  • CP-ITI-363-02.doc Sarah: Web Services Parameter Nomenclature
    • Discussed original recommendation to change from using transaction name to using transaction number. Agreed that name is agreeable, so will not be making that change.
    • Several errors in XDS.b and XCA WSDL files should be fixed, highlighted in spreadsheet
    • RFD use of web services will be updated to be consistent with XDS.b and XCA.
    • HL7 V3 will not be made consistent, stay with current practice of using HL7 web service naming recommendation. As part of XCPI we may expand upon HL7 V3 naming practice to describe how to use one HL7 V3 message in multiple IHE transactions.
    • CP will be re-assigned to Karen
  • CP-ITI-383-03.doc Karen: XCA return home in error messages
    • Ready for Ballot


April 1, 2009

Agenda


Minutes


  • CP-ITI-356-01.doc Rob: XDM – Metadata file digitally signed
    • A few comments on improvements (drug seeking patient, explain CD ROM physical security, ...)
  • CP-ITI-365-03.doc John: Required/optional attributes in PWP
    • Agreed to also make uid be optional. Comment that uid = user id. Ready for ballot after change.
  • CP-ITI-368-00.doc Rob: SMTP clarifications for XDS.a and XDM
    • Agreed that general SMTP section is not needed. Update XDM transaction 3.32.4.1.5 to include actual RFC #.
  • CP-ITI-395-01.doc Rob: Adding FolderId information into NAV message
    • a) Remove change control b) Update to reflect changes introduced in 384 and note that the changes are incorporated here. Once complete, ready for ballot.
  • CP-ITI-398-01.doc John: BPPC clarification of terms
    • Reviewed the beginnings of this work. Add BPPC Policy Domain.
  • CP-ITI-399-01.doc John: DSG title page
    • The DSG supplement is not a transaction or a content profile and so can't be folded in (if ever becomes Final Text) as it stands. Approve for ballot, open a new CP to complete the work. John will submit CP for this.
  • CP-ITI-404-01.doc Mark: ATNA ParticipantObjectDetail use not well-defined
    • Approve for Ballot. Make new CPs for other supplements which need this change. Mark will review other supplements.
  • CP-ITI-405-01.doc John: BPPC clarification of consent template
    • Discussed recommendation documented in the CP. Agreed to the plan outlined in the CP. John will do further editing.
  • CP-ITI-406-01.doc John: BPPC codes
    • We don't yet have the LOINC code. Keep CP open until we get the value. classcode for BPPC documents will be the newly assigned LOINC code. Other recommended actions agreed to.
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XCA-Responding Gateway not asynchronous.doc
    • Discussed and agreed that we would continue to require asynchronous behavior on the Responding Gateway. This CP will be accepted and used to update the open issue that was not updated when the asynchronous support was integrated into the supplement.


March 18, 2009

Agenda


Minutes


  • CP-ITI-383-02.doc Karen: XCA return home in error messages
    • Modified the requirements for specifying home in error messages
  • CP-ITI-397-02.doc Lynn: Clarification on NAV sendAcknowledgementTo
    • Minor text editing agreed to. Version 03 ready for ballot.
  • CP-ITI-XCA_Add_XDS_option_to_Responding_Gateway.doc
    • Discussed that a Responding Gateway should make its best effort to simulate a document registry
    • Agreed to make optional the support by Responding gateway of associations, folders and submission sets. Required is support of documents and document entry metadata. If the community associated with the RG does not have a concept matching associations, folders and submission sets the RG shall respond to related queries with zero entries. Perhaps even list each query and which are associated with which concepts.
  • All other CPs deferred


March 4, 2009

Agenda


  • CP's to review
  • Incoming
    • CP_ITI_gec_XDS_hash_lcase.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-EncodingOfLocalProcessIdentifier-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-EncodingOfQueryContent-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-ParticipantObjectDetail-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-BPPC clarification of consent template-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-BPPC codes-00.doc
    • CP-ITI-gec-ATNA_Log_Message_Documentation_ITI-18.doc
    • CP-ITI-SEK_XDS_Handling_of_coded_stored_query_parameters.doc
  • Planning for next CP tcon

Minutes


  • Incoming
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-EncodingOfLocalProcessIdentifier-00.doc
      • Some parts of the problem will be submitted to DICOM and other parts resolved within IHE. Mark, Rob and John will work together (Rob to initiate email thread) to determine which parts should be addressed where. Assigned to Rob as CP 402.
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-EncodingOfQueryContent-00.doc
      • Assign CP 403 to Mark
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-ATNA-ParticipantObjectDetail-00.doc
      • Assign CP 404 to Mark
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-BPPC clarification of consent template-00.doc
      • Assign CP 405 to John who will work with Keith
    • CP-ITI-Forcare-BPPC codes-00.doc
      • Assign CP 406 to John 406
    • CP-ITI-gec-ATNA_Log_Message_Documentation_ITI-18.doc
      • Assign CP 407 to George
    • CP_ITI_gec_XDS_hash_lcase.doc
      • Assign CP 408 to John
    • CP-ITI-SEK_XDS_Handling_of_coded_stored_query_parameters.doc
      • Assign CP 409 to Bill, email to Sarah, Mark for them to discuss
  • CP-ITI-368-00.doc Rob: SMTP clarifications for XDS.a and XDM
    • CP is a change to ATNA since SMTP details effect all SMTP carried data, not just IHE transactions. Enhance the sections to make it really clear that this information only pertains to transfer of data containing PHI.
  • CP-ITI-365-01.doc John: Required/optional attributes in PWP
    • Rob did CP number transformation and edited this by accident. Reviewed his conclusion, agreed that all but X500... should be required. John will do a little more research to understand why we set it to be required and consider changing to optional.
  • CP-ITI-395-01.doc Rob: Adding FolderId information into NAV message
    • Pull edited text from currently published NAV supplement (text was from CP submission which included changes not marked and is old). Add to code value "urn:oid:" and text describing property.
  • CP-ITI-389-01.doc Karen: Responding Gateway requires two WSDL endpoints
    • Reviewed conclusions and agreed to cancel
  • Defered for future call
  • Planning for next CP tcons
    • March 18
      • Rob 356, 395
      • Lynn 397
      • Vassil 310
      • Karen & Bill defered items from today (see above)
    • April 1
      • John 398 & 399 & 365


January 27-29, 2009

Agenda

  • CP Ballot release planned Feb 11
  • Plan tcons
  • CPs to review
  • incoming
    • CP-ITI-VDP-XCA_Meta_Data.doc

Minutes

January 27

  • CP-ITI-KW-GroupingNotTestable-00.doc
    • Lengthy discussion of changing XCA to use options instead of grouping. No strong consensus on the change. Decided to reject the CP in favor of fixing the connectathon testing process.
  • CP-ITI-JFM_BPPC_Clarrification_of_terms
    • assign to john 398
  • CP-ITI-JFM_CT_SNTP
    • duplicate submission
  • CP-ITI-JFM_DSG_title_page
    • assign to john 399
  • ITI_LF_PDO-last_upd_datetime_v3
    • assign to Alean 400
  • CP-ITI-391-00.doc Alean: What does R2 mean for a PIX Manager
    • a recommendation for how to address the concern was discussed and Alean will document that recommendation

January 28

  • CP-ITI-259-01.doc Bill: parentDocumentRelationship (parentDocumentId) is unclear
    • Fix editor instructions and verify with Sarah
  • CP-ITI-296-01.doc Bill: Improve Submission Set Description
    • Ready for ballot
  • CP-ITI-318-01.doc Bill: Query Example Typo
    • Fix bolded 350 (remove it) and then ready for ballot
  • CP-ITI-359-01.doc Bill: XDS document relations in a single submission set
    • Agreed, ready for ballot with minor fix
  • CP-ITI-384-02.doc Karen: Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message
    • Wordsmithing to include shall, ready for ballot

January 29

  • CP-ITI-361-02.doc Bill: New Stored Query
    • Concern with this query that pulling multiple objects require that all objects be associated with the same patient. This restriction should apply to the existing queries as well as this proposed new one. Bill will submit a new CP to add the restriction to the existing queries for multiple objects and then update this query to have the same language.
  • CP-ITI-VDP-XCA_Meta_Data.doc
    • Use case can be addressed through a special code that identifies documents a potential rather than already existing. Would put new requirements on a Responding Gateway that supports this after retrieve of potential document. Given nature of the change will be done through a late season white paper started in June 2009. Assigned to Karen as CP 401.



January 22, 2009

Agenda

Goal, prepare CPs for ballot in February 2009

  • CPs continued from last call
    • CP-ITI-314-00.doc Bill: XDS Folder Entry Identifiers
      • Bill to query Keith
    • CP-ITI-359-00.doc Bill: XDS document relations in a single submission set
      • Bill to write text
    • CP-ITI-381-02.doc Karen: homeCommunityId needs definitition in metadata tables
      • Updated text available to review
    • CP-ITI-384-02.doc Karen: Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message
      • Updated text available to review
    • CP-ITI-388-01.doc Karen: Unclear what error should result when Retrieve Document Set specifies an unknown uniqueID
      • Updated text available to review
    • CP-ITI-394-03.doc John: XCA and XDS.b ATNA Logging Enhancements
      • Updated text available to review
  • CPs ready to review
    • CP-ITI-393-00.doc George: Extend the support for encodedResponse to the HTTP Get and HTTP Post transport methods
  • CPs for discussion
  • incoming
    • CP_ITI_LF_duplicate_options_row.doc
    • CP_ITI_LF_NAV_sendAcknowledgementId.doc
    • cp-iti-bill-rep_return_size_hash - use case from Bill (or reject)
    • cp-iti-bill-repositoryUniqueId.doc
    • CP-ITI-JFM_BPPC_Clarrification_of_terms
    • CP-ITI-JFM_CT_SNTP
    • CP-ITI-JFM_DSG_title_page
    • CP-ITI-JMG_Extend_the_use_of_encodedResponse
    • CP-ITI-KW-GroupingNotTestable-00.doc
    • IHE_Change_Proposal-XUA
    • ITI_LF_PDO-last_upd_datetime_v3
  • Planning for f2f CP discussions (see Assigned CPs for list of CPs organized by technical area.)
    • Alean - 1
    • Bill - 14
    • Charles - 1
    • George - 3
    • John - 2
    • Karen - 5
    • Rob - 3
    • Vassil - 5
    • Yongjian - 1

Minutes


  • CP-ITI-314-00.doc Bill: XDS Folder Entry Identifiers
    • Bill to query Keith (still TBD)
  • CP-ITI-359-00.doc Bill: XDS document relations in a single submission set
    • Bill to write text (still TBD, waiting for a block of CPs to work on)
  • CP-ITI-381-02.doc Karen: homeCommunityId needs definitition in metadata tables
    • Ready for ballot
  • CP-ITI-384-02.doc Karen: Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message
    • Defer for review at f2f
  • CP-ITI-388-01.doc Karen: Unclear what error should result when Retrieve Document Set specifies an unknown uniqueID
    • Ready for ballot
  • CP-ITI-394-02.doc John: XCA and XDS.b ATNA Logging Enhancements
    • Ready for ballot - Lynn will communicate requirement to connecatathon participants. Plan for CP Ballot second week in Feb.
  • CP-ITI-393-00.doc George: Extend the support for encodedResponse to the HTTP Get and HTTP Post transport methods
    • Incorporate this requirement into the revisions planned for RFD in the 2009 cycle. Some ad-hoc testing at connectathon discussed and discussions will continue at RFD specific connecatathon/HIMSS meetings.
  • CP-ITI-361-02.doc Bill: New Stored Query
    • Discussion needed with Rob and John - defer to f2f
  • CP-ITI-259-00.doc Bill: parentDocumentRelationship (parentDocumentId) is unclear
    • Bill to work up some language for us to review
  • CP-ITI-296-00.doc Bill: Improve Submission Set Description
    • cleanup of terms needed - Bill to prepare text
  • CP-ITI-358-00.doc Bill: Author semantics on documents and submission sets
    • Cancel - information moved to implementors guide
  • CP_ITI_LF_duplicate_options_row.doc
    • Ready for ballot, assign to Lynn
  • CP_ITI_LF_NAV_sendAcknowledgementId.doc
    • Assign to Lynn
  • cp-iti-bill-rep_return_size_hash - use case from Bill (or reject)
    • Reject - no compelling use case can be identified
  • cp-iti-bill-repositoryUniqueId.doc
    • Reject - value is defined in XDS.b
  • CP-ITI-JFM_BPPC_Clarrification_of_terms
    • Defered to f2f
  • CP-ITI-JFM_CT_SNTP
    • Defered to f2f
  • CP-ITI-JFM_DSG_title_page
    • Defered to f2f
  • CP-ITI-JMG_Extend_the_use_of_encodedResponse
    • Mistakenly left in incoming, needs to be deleted
  • IHE_Change_Proposal-XUA
    • Reject - duplicate with changes from 2008.
  • ITI_LF_PDO-last_upd_datetime_v3
    • Defer for f2f when Alean is available


January 9, 2009

Agenda

Goal, prepare CPs for ballot in February 2009

  • CPs ready to review
  • CPs waiting for Ballot
  • incoming
    • CP Forcare PDQ PIX Acknowledgment Code Inconsistency
    • CP_ITI_DSG_Folder_DSG
    • CP_ITI_NAV_folder
    • cp-iti-bill-rep_return_size_hash
    • CP-ITI-JFM_BPPC_Clarrification_of_terms
    • CP-ITI-JFM_CT_SNTP
    • CP-ITI-JFM_DSG_title_page
    • CP-ITI-JMG_Extend_the_use_of_encodedResponse
    • IHE_Change_Proposal-XUA
    • ITI_LF_PDO-last_upd_datetime_v3

Minutes


  • CP-ITI-314-00.doc Bill: XDS Folder Entry Identifiers
    • The committee is unsure whether this requirement is still needed. Bill will ask Keith.
  • CP-ITI-359-00.doc Bill: XDS document relations in a single submission set
    • This is just some clarifications needed, no technical change to requirements. Bill will write text.
  • CP-ITI-379-00.doc Lynn: Profile dependencies (grouping) inconsistencies
    • Move TI supplement updates out of TF update and into supplement text. Then ready for ballot. Suggests perhaps a template update which points out that supplements should be considering updating the table when they include dependencies.
  • CP-ITI-380-00.doc Lynn: BPPC Patient Patient Privacy Enforcement option is missing for the Integ. Doc Source / Rep actor
    • Check section reference for Doc Source of XDS.b. Then ready for ballot.
  • CP-ITI-381-01.doc Karen: homeCommunityId needs definitition in metadata tables
    • Change definition to be simply a unique id of community. Add TF-2 to references.
  • CP-ITI-384-01.doc Karen: Adding homeCommunityId information into NAV message
    • Add a new identifier homeCommunityId that is R2. Editing work followed by second review.
  • CP-ITI-386-00.doc Bill: SQ Bad Param
    • Cancel, recommend use of RegistryError in this case.
  • CP-ITI-388-00.doc Karen: Unclear what error should result when Retrieve Document Set specifies an unknown uniqueID
    • Security concern that we should not distinguish between doesn't exist and not authorized. Verify that these two problems are reflected in the same way, and update description to include both.
  • CP-ITI-390-01.doc Lynn: Document Registry is mentioned in PDO, but no rqmts in Vol 1 material
    • Ready for ballot.
  • CP-ITI-393-00.doc George: Extend the support for encodedResponse to the HTTP Get and HTTP Post transport methods
    • Ran out of time
  • CP-ITI-394-00.doc John: XCA and XDS.b ATNA Logging Enhancements
    • The audit message for retrieve document set was over-simplified so that its reuse by XCA was a problem. John will write up and distribute to be considered for connectathon.
  • incoming
    • CP Forcare PDQ PIX Acknowledgment Code Inconsistency
      • Apppendix C is planning to be re-written. Proposal is to include a proper definition of AE & AR in appendix C as a response to this request. Recommend including this changes as part of the appendix C changes. Karen to request Yongjian to open a CP to track the work on the appendix C and reject this CP as a duplicate of that larger CP.
    • CP_ITI_DSG_Folder_DSG
      • No strong use case for this right now so reject.
    • CP_ITI_NAV_folder
      • Assign to Rob - resolution is to put folder id in the signatureproperty as an informative value.
    • cp-iti-bill-rep_return_size_hash
      • Bill will review. Reject on next call unless compelling use case available.
    • The following were not reviewed because we ran out of time
      • CP-ITI-JFM_BPPC_Clarrification_of_terms
      • CP-ITI-JFM_CT_SNTP
      • CP-ITI-JFM_DSG_title_page
      • CP-ITI-JMG_Extend_the_use_of_encodedResponse
      • IHE_Change_Proposal-XUA
      • ITI_LF_PDO-last_upd_datetime_v3


Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Change_Proposals_2009&oldid=34133"