EduWG Minutes 2015-04-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
* HL7 has outsourced the actual remote testing to [https://www.kryteriononline.com/] | * HL7 has outsourced the actual remote testing to [https://www.kryteriononline.com/] | ||
* the IHE board will need a recommendation on the exam charge | |||
** (Anecdotal evidence is in the range of 100-400 US$) | |||
** TODO: Find out what others charge for the exam and certification, with a size / scope similar to the ICP Foundation | |||
* The IHE board will need an estimation of how many certifications are expected? | |||
* Agreement: Professional / expert review of the exam questions is necessary | |||
** this needs to be independent from those who develop the questions / take the exams | |||
** The test must be reviewed to be: | |||
*** correct | |||
*** not too easy / too hard | |||
* Process for developing the exam | |||
** collect questions | |||
** have experts take the test (IHE workgroup members, CAT monitors, ) | |||
*** provide an incentive to them | |||
** collect feedback from those experts | |||
Revision as of 10:07, 13 April 2015
Preliminary!!!! Copy of Agenda
Will be used to capture the discussion during the call
9am Welcome
- Participants and introduction round
- Stèphane Spahni (IHE user, university hospital, pharmacy expert, Switzerland)
- Rene Spronk (training provider, IHE expert, Netherlands)
- Stefan Sauermann (training provider, IHE expert, Austria)
Status: What has happened so far
See Google drive
Review of ICP drafts
- CP IHE Foundation Level [1], CP IHE Document Sharing [2]
- What are the "most important" IHE profiles?
- See Ranking list of profiles by CAT testing frequency
- The "Top 20" are coloured dark green
- Ranks 21-30 are coloured light green
- The first 30 profiles (top 20%) may be considered to be "important"
- There are regional differences!
- Decision: There are 3 categories:
- the profiles you must be able to discuss actors and transactions, on Vol 1 level
- Rank 1-20 on the "global" list of 143
- the profiles you only know a bit about, like what do they adress
- Rank 21-30 on the "global" list
- the profiles you can look up in IHE documents in case you need them.
- all the rest
- the profiles you must be able to discuss actors and transactions, on Vol 1 level
Methods for testing the skills
- A first list of exam questions has been collected
- It contains "open text" questions
- These may be published so that candidates can prepare for the exam
- It contains single choice questions
- These will be used for the exam
- They will therefore remain "secret"
- They may be published in the future, if there are so many that the sheer mass will assure a fair exam.
- It contains "open text" questions
- Discuss!!
- This method was sucessfully used in IHE related training in Vienna.
- Similar methods are used by others.
- Does this make sense?
- Decision:
- This method is a useful way to go forward
- the available list provides useful examples but definitely needs more work
Management Issues
- Which organisational structure is neccessary to design, implement and run the ICP scheme
- Business model
- HL7 has outsourced the actual remote testing to [3]
- the IHE board will need a recommendation on the exam charge
- (Anecdotal evidence is in the range of 100-400 US$)
- TODO: Find out what others charge for the exam and certification, with a size / scope similar to the ICP Foundation
- The IHE board will need an estimation of how many certifications are expected?
- Agreement: Professional / expert review of the exam questions is necessary
- this needs to be independent from those who develop the questions / take the exams
- The test must be reviewed to be:
- correct
- not too easy / too hard
- Process for developing the exam
- collect questions
- have experts take the test (IHE workgroup members, CAT monitors, )
- provide an incentive to them
- collect feedback from those experts