Difference between revisions of "Prehospital Care Report"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
  
==1. Proposed Profile: ''Prehospital Care Report – Integration of Motor Vehicle Crash Victim ECON / PHR Data''==
+
==1. Proposed Profile: ''Prehospital Care Report – Integration and Reporting of Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) Data''==
  
* Proposal Editor: ''[[User:Kboone|Kboone]]''
+
* Proposal Editor: ''[[User:Kboone|Keith Boone]]''
* Profile Editor: ''TBD''  
+
* Profile Editor(s): ''[[User:LWilliams|Lawrence Williams]], [[User:Trothenh|Todd Rothenhaus]]''  
 
* Date:    N/A (Wiki keeps history)
 
* Date:    N/A (Wiki keeps history)
 
* Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
 
* Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==2. The Problem==
 
==2. The Problem==
There is consensus among the emergency healthcare community that the widespread adoption of Health Information Technology (HIT) by the automotive industry will lead to a faster and more appropriate response.  This will lead to safer, more effective health care for crash victims following a motor vehicle crash.  
+
There is consensus among the emergency health care community that the widespread adoption of Health Information Technology (HIT) by the automotive industry will lead to faster and more appropriate responses following motor vehicle crashes.  
 
   
 
   
 
The quid pro quo for investing in such systems is the improvement of safety, care, and outcomes for the nearly 250,000 crash victims (6,000,000 worldwide) who sustain life-threatening injuries annually as a result of motor vehicle crashes.
 
The quid pro quo for investing in such systems is the improvement of safety, care, and outcomes for the nearly 250,000 crash victims (6,000,000 worldwide) who sustain life-threatening injuries annually as a result of motor vehicle crashes.
  
Persistent deficiencies in the quality of emergency healthcare for motor vehicle crash victims is attributable in part to the continued reliance by many emergency responders and emergency room clinicians on archaic, paper-based methods of communicating crash victim key health information, such as Emergency Contact Information (ECON) and Personal Health Record (PHR) data.   
+
Persistent deficiencies in the quality of emergency health care for motor vehicle crash victims is attributable in part to the continued reliance by many emergency responders and emergency room clinicians on archaic, paper-based methods of communicating crash victim key health information, such as Emergency Contact Information (ECON) and Personal Health Record (PHR) data.   
  
Under a worst-case scenario, an emergency room clinician in an out-of-town emergency room trying to treat an unconscious crash victim would have no idea what other medical conditions the crash victim might have or which medications he or she might be taking, nor contact information for an emergency contact / next-of-kin who might be able to provide such data. This lack of data increases the risks of adverse reactions to treatment or medication that threaten the safety, care, and outcome for crash victims.
+
Under a worst-case scenario, an emergency room clinician in an out-of-town emergency room treating an unconscious crash victim would have no idea what pertinent medical conditions the crash victim might have or which medications he or she might be taking, nor contact information for an emergency contact / next-of-kin who might be able to provide such data. This lack of data increases the risks of adverse reactions to treatment or medication that threaten the safety, care, and outcome for crash victims.
  
 
Specifically, the current HIT challenge is:  
 
Specifically, the current HIT challenge is:  
  
1) Emergency Responder real-time access and exchange of crash victim ECON / PHR data at the scene of a motor vehicle crash (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
+
1) Emergency Responder real-time access to crash victim ECON / PHR data at the scene of a motor vehicle crash (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
  
2) Electronic integration of ECON / PHR data into Ambulance Information System (AIS) pre-hospital care reports supporting real-time messaging of crash victim ECON / PHR data to Emergency Department Clinicians.
+
2) Electronic integration of ECON / PHR data into Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) system and pre-hospital care reports (PCR) supporting real-time messaging of crash victim ECON / PHR data to Emergency Department Clinicians.
  
 
At present, ECON / PHR data obtained by emergency responders prior to arrival at the emergency room is often conveyed as a handwritten paper document or in electronic form after the fact.
 
At present, ECON / PHR data obtained by emergency responders prior to arrival at the emergency room is often conveyed as a handwritten paper document or in electronic form after the fact.
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
Current Use Case:
 
Current Use Case:
 
+
#A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
1. A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
+
#Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification.
 
+
#An EMS unit is dispatched to the scene.
2. Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification.
+
#EMS personnel treat the patient for injuries.  
 
+
#Patient is transported to the nearest hospital emergency department.
3. An ambulance is dispatched to the scene.
+
#Police attempt to notify family members.  
+
#Upon arrival of the patient to the Emergency Department, treatment for injuries continues.  
4. Ambulance personnel treat the patient for trauma and shock, and note signs of internal injuries.  
+
#The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system (EDIS).  
 
+
#EMS personnel complete their run report, and provide a paper copy to the Emergency Department.
5. Patient is transported to the emergency room at the nearest hospital.
+
#Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient.  
 
+
#Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient's status.  
6. Police attempt to notify family members.  
 
 
 
7. Upon delivery of the patient to the emergency room, treatment for internal injuries is begun.  
 
 
 
8. The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system.  
 
 
 
9. Ambulance personnel complete their run report, and provide a copy to the emergency department.
 
 
 
10. Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient.  
 
 
 
11. Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient status.  
 
  
  
 
Improved Use Case:
 
Improved Use Case:
 +
# A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
 +
# Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 +
# An EMS unit is dispatched to the scene.
 +
## ''Patient identity data is sent to the Emergency Responder EHR (ER-EHR) system.''
 +
## ''The ER-EHR system retrieves patient key health information from an ECON / PHR system.''
 +
# EMS personnel treat the patient for injuries.
 +
## ''Treatment details are recorded in the ER-EHR system.''
 +
# Patient is transported to the nearest hospital emergency department
 +
## ''Transport details are recorded in the ER-EHR system.''
 +
# Police attempt to notify family members (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 +
# Upon arrival of the patient to the Emergency Department, treatment for injuries continues.
 +
## ''An electronic pre-hospital care record (PCR) of the treatment, personal health information, emergency contact info. / next-of-kin data, is provided upon delivery to the facility.''
 +
# The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system.
 +
# EMS personnel complete their run report, and information in the PCR is used to electronically update the Emergency Department Information System.
 +
# Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 +
# Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient status (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
  
1. A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
 
 
2. Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification
 
 
o (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 
 
3. An ambulance is dispatched to the scene.
 
 
o Patient identity data is sent to the Ambulance Information System (AIS).
 
 
o The AIS retrieves patient key health information from an ECON / PHR system.
 
 
4. Ambulance personnel treat the patient for trauma and shock, and note signs of internal injuries.
 
 
o Treatment details are recorded in the AIS.
 
 
5. Patient is transported to the emergency room at the nearest hospital.
 
 
o Transport details are recorded in the AIS.
 
 
o Ambulance Attendant updates treatment details in the AIS.
 
 
6. Police attempt to notify family members.
 
 
o (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 
 
 
7. Upon delivery of the patient to the emergency room, treatment for internal injuries is begun.
 
 
o An electronic record of the treatment, personal health information, emergency contact info. / next-of-kin data, is provided upon delivery to the facility.
 
 
8. The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system.
 
 
o Information already provided by the ambulance attendant is used to quickly update the Emergency Department records.
 
 
9. Ambulance personnel complete their run report, and provide a copy to the emergency department
 
 
10. Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient.
 
 
o (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 
 
11. Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient status.
 
 
o (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
 
  
 
==4. Standards & Systems==
 
==4. Standards & Systems==
  
* Ambulance Information System
+
* Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) System
* Emergency Department Information System
+
* Emergency Department Information System (EDIS)
 
* Emergency Contact Registry (ECON) System - See ECON IHE ITI Profile Proposal
 
* Emergency Contact Registry (ECON) System - See ECON IHE ITI Profile Proposal
* Personal Health Record (PHR) System  
+
* Personal Health Record (PHR) System(s)
  
  

Revision as of 01:43, 10 November 2007


1. Proposed Profile: Prehospital Care Report – Integration and Reporting of Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) Data

2. The Problem

There is consensus among the emergency health care community that the widespread adoption of Health Information Technology (HIT) by the automotive industry will lead to faster and more appropriate responses following motor vehicle crashes.

The quid pro quo for investing in such systems is the improvement of safety, care, and outcomes for the nearly 250,000 crash victims (6,000,000 worldwide) who sustain life-threatening injuries annually as a result of motor vehicle crashes.

Persistent deficiencies in the quality of emergency health care for motor vehicle crash victims is attributable in part to the continued reliance by many emergency responders and emergency room clinicians on archaic, paper-based methods of communicating crash victim key health information, such as Emergency Contact Information (ECON) and Personal Health Record (PHR) data.

Under a worst-case scenario, an emergency room clinician in an out-of-town emergency room treating an unconscious crash victim would have no idea what pertinent medical conditions the crash victim might have or which medications he or she might be taking, nor contact information for an emergency contact / next-of-kin who might be able to provide such data. This lack of data increases the risks of adverse reactions to treatment or medication that threaten the safety, care, and outcome for crash victims.

Specifically, the current HIT challenge is:

1) Emergency Responder real-time access to crash victim ECON / PHR data at the scene of a motor vehicle crash (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).

2) Electronic integration of ECON / PHR data into Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) system and pre-hospital care reports (PCR) supporting real-time messaging of crash victim ECON / PHR data to Emergency Department Clinicians.

At present, ECON / PHR data obtained by emergency responders prior to arrival at the emergency room is often conveyed as a handwritten paper document or in electronic form after the fact.

3. Key Use Case

Current Use Case:

  1. A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
  2. Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification.
  3. An EMS unit is dispatched to the scene.
  4. EMS personnel treat the patient for injuries.
  5. Patient is transported to the nearest hospital emergency department.
  6. Police attempt to notify family members.
  7. Upon arrival of the patient to the Emergency Department, treatment for injuries continues.
  8. The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system (EDIS).
  9. EMS personnel complete their run report, and provide a paper copy to the Emergency Department.
  10. Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient.
  11. Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient's status.


Improved Use Case:

  1. A patient is involved in a motor vehicle crash.
  2. Police are first to arrive on the scene and begin process of patient identification (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
  3. An EMS unit is dispatched to the scene.
    1. Patient identity data is sent to the Emergency Responder EHR (ER-EHR) system.
    2. The ER-EHR system retrieves patient key health information from an ECON / PHR system.
  4. EMS personnel treat the patient for injuries.
    1. Treatment details are recorded in the ER-EHR system.
  5. Patient is transported to the nearest hospital emergency department
    1. Transport details are recorded in the ER-EHR system.
  6. Police attempt to notify family members (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
  7. Upon arrival of the patient to the Emergency Department, treatment for injuries continues.
    1. An electronic pre-hospital care record (PCR) of the treatment, personal health information, emergency contact info. / next-of-kin data, is provided upon delivery to the facility.
  8. The patient is identified in the Emergency Department information system.
  9. EMS personnel complete their run report, and information in the PCR is used to electronically update the Emergency Department Information System.
  10. Emergency Department personnel attempt to contact family members to obtain more information about the patient (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).
  11. Family members contact the hospital, and try to obtain information about the patient status (See IHE ITI ECON Profile Proposal for Motor Vehicle Crash Victims).


4. Standards & Systems

  • Emergency Responder Electronic Health Record (ER-EHR) System
  • Emergency Department Information System (EDIS)
  • Emergency Contact Registry (ECON) System - See ECON IHE ITI Profile Proposal
  • Personal Health Record (PHR) System(s)


  • HL7 CDA Release 2.0
  • HL7 Version 2.X ADT
  • ASTM/HL7 Continuity of Care Document
  • VEDS
  • LOINC
  • HL7 Ambulation Attachment Implementation Guide

5. Discussion

<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>

<Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
<What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
<What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>


<This is the brief proposal. Try to keep it to 1 or at most 2 pages>


<Delete this Category Templates line since your specific Profile Proposal page is no longer a template.>