PCD TC 2011-08-31 Webex: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m →Proposed Agenda: update agenda |
m →Discussion: partial entry this section |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
: | : Agenda approved with additions of the HL7 CPs. Todd Cooper requested the HL7 CP around the new IPEC trigger (ORU^R42) item. | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair | | '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:* Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted | :* Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
:* | :* | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 3 | | align="center" | 3 | ||
| ''' | | '''Agenda Items''' <br>- As Noted | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
: | |||
3. Existing Profile and TF Development Updates | |||
:ACM: | |||
:- Todd submitted a CP regarding the ORU^R40 (to be discussed in HL WG meeting in San Diego week of September 11th). | |||
:IPEC: | |||
:- PIV group will meet to discuss the new trigger R42 on Wednesday 8/31/11 at 2 PM Eastern. This is slated to become part of HL7 2.9 Version item, Friday morning at HL7 meetings. When deprecating existing/old information, Hans B (HL7) indicated that the text shall remain for the following two versions (via an email to Todd and John Rhodes). | |||
:WCM: | |||
:- Todd raised the question (to John Rhoads re: WCM at the HL7 Meeting (scheduled for Orders and Observations WG - Friday, Sept. 16 of the week) - would it be better to put on the table as an informal item, or actually put on the table for formal CP - everyone agreed that this is a good question for Hans B. PCD would likely need a 15 minute time slot at HL7 (Friday morning OO WG meeting). | |||
:- Todd's CP addressed the differences between R01 and R40, the issue ORU^R01^ORU_R40 - Harry Solomon (GE/HL7)suggested if only constraining down, PCD should just use the same message structure. This raised the question if we need to do the same for ACM? Do we feel the constraints we put on ORU^R01 lead us to a different message structure - probably yes, as the message in question has specific information necessary for carrying Waveforms. | |||
:- John Rhoads noted: A distinction needs to be drawn in the message profile (MSH.21) vs. the message structure. Understanding that the message structure would be the "super-set" but we are further restricting it. Todd's sense is PCD should normalize the message structure (MSH.8 to be consistent with V2.8 ORU^R40) - this would require a CP to ACM. Initial discussion with Monroe seemed to be that he agrees to this approach. | |||
:Pump WG: | |||
:- Item for today's meeting WG - status of Pharmacy interest in PIV - is it worth having a proposal into PCD (or ITI) now to have a joint profiling activity or too soon (could also be a white paper). | |||
:Asynchronous Data Query: Next meeting on September 1 | |||
:Point-of-Care Identity Management: Next meeting September 6 | |||
:Change Proposals: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Change_Proposal_List | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 4 September 2011
Patient Care Device Domain
Meeting Purpose
TC Regularly Scheduled Meeting
WebEx Information
Topic: PCD Technical Committee Meeting
- Regularly Scheduled Meeting Time
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)
Duration: 60 Minutes
Proposed Agenda
- 1. Agenda Approval
- 2. Review Discussion Summary: Technical Committee August 17 PCD TC 2011-08-17 Webex
- 3. Existing Profile and TF Development Updates
- ACM
- o HL7 CP regarding the ORU^R40 (added)
- IPEC
- o HL7 CP around the new IPEC trigger (ORU^R42) (added)
- Asynchronous Data Query
- Point-of-Care Identity Management
- Change Proposals
- 4. Moving Forward on the roadmap: next steps on Existing Profiles and new Profile Proposals
- 5. Action Item Review
- 6. Next and Recent Meetings
- 7. Additional Business
Action Items from Previous Meetings
See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.
Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
Participants
Chair: John Rhoads (TC Co-Chair)
John Garguilo (TC Co-Chair, note taker), Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Ken Fuchs, Sarah Hopkins, Khalil Maalouf, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Erin Sparnon, Richard Swim, Manny Furst
Discussion
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda approved with additions of the HL7 CPs. Todd Cooper requested the HL7 CP around the new IPEC trigger (ORU^R42) item.
Action(s):
2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 Agenda Items
- As NotedStatus/Discussion: 3. Existing Profile and TF Development Updates
- ACM:
- - Todd submitted a CP regarding the ORU^R40 (to be discussed in HL WG meeting in San Diego week of September 11th).
- IPEC:
- - PIV group will meet to discuss the new trigger R42 on Wednesday 8/31/11 at 2 PM Eastern. This is slated to become part of HL7 2.9 Version item, Friday morning at HL7 meetings. When deprecating existing/old information, Hans B (HL7) indicated that the text shall remain for the following two versions (via an email to Todd and John Rhodes).
- WCM:
- - Todd raised the question (to John Rhoads re: WCM at the HL7 Meeting (scheduled for Orders and Observations WG - Friday, Sept. 16 of the week) - would it be better to put on the table as an informal item, or actually put on the table for formal CP - everyone agreed that this is a good question for Hans B. PCD would likely need a 15 minute time slot at HL7 (Friday morning OO WG meeting).
- - Todd's CP addressed the differences between R01 and R40, the issue ORU^R01^ORU_R40 - Harry Solomon (GE/HL7)suggested if only constraining down, PCD should just use the same message structure. This raised the question if we need to do the same for ACM? Do we feel the constraints we put on ORU^R01 lead us to a different message structure - probably yes, as the message in question has specific information necessary for carrying Waveforms.
- - John Rhoads noted: A distinction needs to be drawn in the message profile (MSH.21) vs. the message structure. Understanding that the message structure would be the "super-set" but we are further restricting it. Todd's sense is PCD should normalize the message structure (MSH.8 to be consistent with V2.8 ORU^R40) - this would require a CP to ACM. Initial discussion with Monroe seemed to be that he agrees to this approach.
- Pump WG:
- - Item for today's meeting WG - status of Pharmacy interest in PIV - is it worth having a proposal into PCD (or ITI) now to have a joint profiling activity or too soon (could also be a white paper).
- Asynchronous Data Query: Next meeting on September 1
- Point-of-Care Identity Management: Next meeting September 6
- Change Proposals: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Change_Proposal_List
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 AAMI-Mini Showcase
- MannyStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 yyy
-Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
6 Action Items
- ChairsStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
7 Announcements
- AllStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
8 xyz
-Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
Next Meeting
The next meetings are:
PC September 7, 2011 PCD PC 2011-09-07 Webex
TC September 14, 2011 PCD TC 2011-09-14 Webex