Talk:Emergency Department Encounter Record: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kboone (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Trothenh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
#Potential need for LOINC codes for new elements.<br/>
#Potential need for LOINC codes for new elements.<br/>
#Use of Co-occurrence Constraint [Conditional Restraint] for Disposition elements.<br/>
#Use of Co-occurrence Constraint [Conditional Restraint] for Disposition elements.<br/>
#Snomed vs. DEEDS for Disposition? <br/>


===Closed Issues===
===Closed Issues===
# Content vetted by full [[Patient_Care_Coordination]] Technical Committee.<br/>
# Content vetted by full [[Patient_Care_Coordination]] Technical Committee.<br/>
# The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.<br/>
# The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.<br/>

Revision as of 15:07, 29 March 2007

Issue Log

Open Issues

  1. Patients frequently leave the ED prior to documentation being finalized. Triggers in workflow vary. How should the Draft vs. Final Status be handled?
  2. Potential for multiple entries.
  3. Timetable for CCD harmonization?
  4. Target systems discussion.
    1. EDIS  CDR  RHIO
    2. EDIS  RHIO  Ambulatory EHR
    3. EDIS  Ambulatory EHR
  5. Potential need for LOINC codes for new elements.
  6. Use of Co-occurrence Constraint [Conditional Restraint] for Disposition elements.
  1. Snomed vs. DEEDS for Disposition?

Closed Issues

  1. Content vetted by full Patient_Care_Coordination Technical Committee.
  2. The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.