PCD DPI 2009-05-14 WebEx: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs)
m Updated
ToddCooper (talk | contribs)
m Updated
Line 74: Line 74:
:* Note:  [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/20090514_DPI_WebEx See the MindMap and other materials loaded onto the IHE PCD FTP site.]
:* Note:  [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/20090514_DPI_WebEx See the MindMap and other materials loaded onto the IHE PCD FTP site.]


:* Reviewed Presentations & Draft WP documents developed to date
:* ACTIONS related to specific WP discussions are listed below
:* WP Discussion included:
::- Point-of-care includes "care" ... thus the clinician providing the care must be included!
::- Include an Annex re. "MIB for Dummies" with examples extrated from MDCIG II document; morel detailed & focused examples will be addressed in the specific profile supplement documents (e.g., DPI-DR or DPI-SYM).
::- Section 2 Executive Summary includes "operational" (i.e., architectural) and development (i.e., logical subsets, implementation alternatives) aspects.
::- Should discuss use contexts, both topological and clinical workflow-based (which crossover between contexts)
::- "Data types & examples" in the NIST WP draft, are NOT EXHAUSTIVE!
::- Figure 5 - Directory is an extension of DEC...
::- Figure 9 was not fully developed and should be "ignored"


:* Use of DPI Arcitecture Diagram (developed by Jan for NIST discussion):
::- Should present diagram and then show how solutions for various use case subsets could be developed using this model
::- Include the model in Section 4 Point-of-Care, and then lead into / leverage for Section 5
:* Phasing (Slide #8) - the IHE PCD & DPI work program and ROADMAP should include:
::- Detailed device models (using ICS generator)
::- Validation using the NIST "test harness"
::- NOTE:  The RoadMap section should address problem space similarly to what was done in the MDCIG program.
:* Device specialization development - for the initial devices, it was pointed out that there is significant momentum active:
::- Physiological monitors are alread well represented in the Rosetta
::- Infusion pump activity progressing (e.g., F2F in San Diego May 19 & 20)
::- Vent Term Team meetings every couple of weeks to fill that gap.
:* Sandy asked about support for additional use cases such as:
::- ICE related applications (Note:  This will be addressed in a WP appendix)
::- Pandemic support by integrated medical devices, such as collection of "local" data that feeds to the EHR (Note:  this should be addressed by the DPI, DEC, and RTM profiles, which should also be leveraged by the HITSP CmDC use case analysis.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 81: Line 108:
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section
:* '''ACTION:''' (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper.
:* '''ACTION:''' (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper.
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update WP to 0.3 including content from Jan's "NIST" version (incl. Exective Summary section)
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations

Revision as of 14:58, 18 May 2009

(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page


Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG

Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009

Time: 15:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 120 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1. DPI WP Programme Review
2. Review Current WP Draft
3. Open discussion

Attachments / Materials

(No attachments)

Minutes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), John Garguilo (NIST), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH), Jan Wittenber (Philips)


Discussion


Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda reviewed and approved

Action(s):

2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • No discussion notes to review / approve at this time.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Documents to Date Reviewed
- Group
Status/Discussion:
  • Reviewed Presentations & Draft WP documents developed to date
  • ACTIONS related to specific WP discussions are listed below
  • WP Discussion included:
- Point-of-care includes "care" ... thus the clinician providing the care must be included!
- Include an Annex re. "MIB for Dummies" with examples extrated from MDCIG II document; morel detailed & focused examples will be addressed in the specific profile supplement documents (e.g., DPI-DR or DPI-SYM).
- Section 2 Executive Summary includes "operational" (i.e., architectural) and development (i.e., logical subsets, implementation alternatives) aspects.
- Should discuss use contexts, both topological and clinical workflow-based (which crossover between contexts)
- "Data types & examples" in the NIST WP draft, are NOT EXHAUSTIVE!
- Figure 5 - Directory is an extension of DEC...
- Figure 9 was not fully developed and should be "ignored"
  • Use of DPI Arcitecture Diagram (developed by Jan for NIST discussion):
- Should present diagram and then show how solutions for various use case subsets could be developed using this model
- Include the model in Section 4 Point-of-Care, and then lead into / leverage for Section 5
  • Phasing (Slide #8) - the IHE PCD & DPI work program and ROADMAP should include:
- Detailed device models (using ICS generator)
- Validation using the NIST "test harness"
- NOTE: The RoadMap section should address problem space similarly to what was done in the MDCIG program.
  • Device specialization development - for the initial devices, it was pointed out that there is significant momentum active:
- Physiological monitors are alread well represented in the Rosetta
- Infusion pump activity progressing (e.g., F2F in San Diego May 19 & 20)
- Vent Term Team meetings every couple of weeks to fill that gap.
  • Sandy asked about support for additional use cases such as:
- ICE related applications (Note: This will be addressed in a WP appendix)
- Pandemic support by integrated medical devices, such as collection of "local" data that feeds to the EHR (Note: this should be addressed by the DPI, DEC, and RTM profiles, which should also be leveraged by the HITSP CmDC use case analysis.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • ACTION: (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section
  • ACTION: (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper.
  • ACTION: (Cooper) Update WP to 0.3 including content from Jan's "NIST" version (incl. Exective Summary section)
  • ACTION: (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion
  • ACTION: (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations
  • ACTION: (Group) Define how the Device ICS' w/ NIST tools & volume 3 / RTM support will enable DPI verification & conformance testing.
  • ACTION: (Cooper) Develop an Annex with a simple example from UML model to data definitions to message sequence diagram examples. Link to previoius MDCIG activitie (e.g., MDCIG Demo II document), and include sample information from that document.
4 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting <TBD>

Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.05.18 (120 minutes)


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>


PCD Home