ITI Planning - 20180821: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
* Retrospective | |||
** Good | |||
*** Hero came to rescue in two cases | |||
*** Editors brought in SME to help out with the technical details and esoteric need | |||
*** succeeded to publish work items within cycle | |||
** Bad | |||
*** needed hero -- too much unanticipated turnover of people | |||
*** Some work items reset -- difficult questions were deferred but that tended to be problem | |||
**** reset often, and late | |||
*** too little improvement of text happened between face-to-face | |||
*** too little research was done between Planning acceptance (october -> november) | |||
*** expertise needed to review work items was very deep and specialized | |||
*** face-to-face scheduled personal holiday | |||
*** Oslo meeting decisions were not well (Effectively) published | |||
** Improvements | |||
*** Editors should be required to have been an active committee member for at-least a year | |||
*** more use of strawman solutioning | |||
*** more between face-to-face tcon work | |||
*** project proposal needs to include a realistic project plan | |||
*** primary and secondary editors should be assigned | |||
*** Is there a way to reset the plan midway when scope changes? | |||
Revision as of 12:32, 21 August 2018
back ITI Planning Committee 2017/2018 Meetings
Location
To join this meeting
Time 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Monthly on the third Tuesday
Go to https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=me852e7ebefb69e608eea3547ddceeb94
Agenda
- Review agenda
- Record Attendance
- Reminder to vote for co-chairs
- Celebrate release of our work items
- Retrospective analysis exercise? -- What worked well? What didn't work? Improvements?
- Should we get HIMSS to publish some articles?
- Status of new proposals ITI 2019 Proposed Work Items
- Status of webinar -- https://www.ihe.net/resources/webinars/
- Dan - ITI background - August 29 -- https://twitter.com/IHEIntl/status/1031901233022423040
- Dan - Document Sharing ???
- John - MHD+QEDm ???
- other? -- Metadata, AS4, RMU???
- CP process - priorities for next few months (Lynn)
- ITI Planning for FHIR Release 4
- Organize community to vote on FHIR Release 4 ballots
- Plan for how ITI can help mature Resources ITI needs
- Discussion of Elliot's writeup of continuous release proposal
- New Business
Minutes
- Retrospective
- Good
- Hero came to rescue in two cases
- Editors brought in SME to help out with the technical details and esoteric need
- succeeded to publish work items within cycle
- Bad
- needed hero -- too much unanticipated turnover of people
- Some work items reset -- difficult questions were deferred but that tended to be problem
- reset often, and late
- too little improvement of text happened between face-to-face
- too little research was done between Planning acceptance (october -> november)
- expertise needed to review work items was very deep and specialized
- face-to-face scheduled personal holiday
- Oslo meeting decisions were not well (Effectively) published
- Improvements
- Editors should be required to have been an active committee member for at-least a year
- more use of strawman solutioning
- more between face-to-face tcon work
- project proposal needs to include a realistic project plan
- primary and secondary editors should be assigned
- Is there a way to reset the plan midway when scope changes?
- Good