Rad Plan Minutes 2009-10-22: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Mplanchart (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Kinson Ho - Agfa | * Kinson Ho - Agfa | ||
* David Mendelson, MD - RSNA | * David Mendelson, MD - RSNA | ||
* Michael Planchart - | * Michael Planchart - Riverain | ||
* Khan Siddiqui, MD - Microsoft | * Khan Siddiqui, MD - Microsoft | ||
* Niki Wirsz, PhD - Siemens | * Niki Wirsz, PhD - Siemens | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:* Overview of '''[[Radiology_Proposals_2009-2010|Proposal Evaluations]]''' - (5 min each) | :* Overview of '''[[Radiology_Proposals_2009-2010|Proposal Evaluations]]''' - (5 min each) | ||
::* A. [[Imaging Object Change Management - Detailed Proposal | Imaging Object Change Management Whitepaper]] - '''35%''' | ::* A. [[Imaging Object Change Management - Detailed Proposal | Imaging Object Change Management Whitepaper]] - '''35%''' | ||
::* B. [[Add Image Repository to SWF/XDS-I - Detailed Proposal | Image Repository Extensions to SWF/XDS-I]] - '''25%''' | ::* B. [[Add Image Repository to SWF/XDS-I - Detailed Proposal | Image Repository Extensions to SWF/XDS-I]] - '''25%''' | ||
::* C. [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal | Scheduled Workflow 2.0 Profile]] - '''40%''' | ::* C. [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal | Scheduled Workflow 2.0 Profile]] - '''40%''' | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
::* F. [[Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10]] - '''10-15%''' | ::* F. [[Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10]] - '''10-15%''' | ||
* '''Motion:''' To proceed with existing list to prepare slates and selection straw polls | |||
:* Approved with one objection, one abstention | |||
:* Brief Review of [[Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap]] | :* Brief Review of [[Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap]] | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
:* Voting | :* Voting | ||
::* Slating rules: must not exceed 100% effort; must include RAD TF Maintenance | |||
:::* Slate 1: FAB[C] (110) | |||
:::* Slate 2: FABD (100) | |||
:::* Slate 3: FAC[B] (105) | |||
:::* Slate 4: FAC[D] (115) | |||
:::* Slate 5: FAC[E] (100) | |||
:::* Slate 6: FAD[C] (115) | |||
:::* Slate 7: FBC[D] (105) | |||
:::* Slate 8: FBCE (90) | |||
:::* Slate 9: FBDE (85) | |||
:::* Slate 10: FCD[B] (105) | |||
:::* Slate 11: FCDE (95) | |||
* '''Slate 2: FABD is the winner.''' | |||
[[Radiology Planning Committee]] | |||
[[Category: Minutes]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 22 October 2009
Location
ihe.webex.com
Attendees
- Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba
- Chris Lindop - GE
- Cor Loef - Philips
- Kinson Ho - Agfa
- David Mendelson, MD - RSNA
- Michael Planchart - Riverain
- Khan Siddiqui, MD - Microsoft
- Niki Wirsz, PhD - Siemens
- Chris Carr - RSNA
Topics
Final Selection of 2009-10 Work Items
- Attendance & Review of Voting Privileges
- Discussion of voting procedure
- Use of "Slates" as in prior years
- Overview of Proposal Evaluations - (5 min each)
- A. Imaging Object Change Management Whitepaper - 35%
- B. Image Repository Extensions to SWF/XDS-I - 25%
- C. Scheduled Workflow 2.0 Profile - 40%
- D. Chest CAD Presentation Profile - 30%
- E. "Simple" Profiles Whitepaper - 15%
- F. Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10 - 10-15%
- Motion: To proceed with existing list to prepare slates and selection straw polls
- Approved with one objection, one abstention
- Brief Review of Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap
- Advocacy and Discussion
- Voting
- Slating rules: must not exceed 100% effort; must include RAD TF Maintenance
- Slate 1: FAB[C] (110)
- Slate 2: FABD (100)
- Slate 3: FAC[B] (105)
- Slate 4: FAC[D] (115)
- Slate 5: FAC[E] (100)
- Slate 6: FAD[C] (115)
- Slate 7: FBC[D] (105)
- Slate 8: FBCE (90)
- Slate 9: FBDE (85)
- Slate 10: FCD[B] (105)
- Slate 11: FCDE (95)
- Slate 2: FABD is the winner.