PCD TC 2009-01-21 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efurst (talk | contribs)
m Establish page
 
Efurst (talk | contribs)
m Next Meeting: move to archive
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
Topic: PCD Weekly Tcons  
Topic: PCD Weekly Tcons  


Date: Wednesday, Janury 21, 2009  
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009  


Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )  
Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )  
Line 14: Line 14:


== Proposed Agenda ==  
== Proposed Agenda ==  
'''Please edit, add, initial placeholder is a carryover of portions of 11/12'''
 
:1. Agenda Approval
:1. Agenda Approval
:2. Issues with past Discussion Summaries  
:2. Review Discussion Summaries
:3. Announcements
::* [[PCD_TC_2009-01-07_Webex | 2009.01.07 WebEx]]
::: Ballot is open for minutes of the TC portion of the F2F and a vote on a RTM issue
:3. News / Announcements
::: New ballot distributed Dec. 7 for PIV Change Proposal; email response requested, will close no later than Dec. 22
::* Ballot Status Update
::: Planning Committee has been asked to vote on the Brief Profile Proposals and to indicate priorities and interest in individual profiles/papers
::* Orlando Reprise
:4. [[PCD_Proposals_2009-2010 | '''''Profile Proposal Review''''']]
::* Connectathon / Showcase Update
:5. "Transaction Packages" Update
::* IHE-IEEE MoU Update
:6. TF / Profile Change Proposal Review
::* HITSP CDC Use Case Call for Participation
:7. Connectathon Update
::* Spring F2F Discussion
::: New company participating: Surgical Information Systems
:4. Action Item Review
::: Physical requirements, utilities needed for Connectathon, Showcase
:5. [[PCD_Proposals_2009-2010 | '''''Profile Proposal Review''''']]
:8. Set date for next meeting.
:6. Rosetta Table Tag Harmonization (esp. w/ aECG)
:9. Additional Business
:7. Additional Business


== Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
== Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
Line 34: Line 34:
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.


'''PLACEHOLDER; Action Items from November 12 TO BE UPDATED WITH JAN. 10'''
'''Action Items from Jan. 7'''


:{|border="2"  
:{|border="2"  
|-
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
! width="20%"  align="left"  |Action
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Owner
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
! width="10%"  align="left"  |Due Date
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
! width="10%"  align="left"  |Status
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
!              align="left"  |Comments
!              align="left"  |Comments


Line 51: Line 51:
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd, Ken
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd, Ken
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 15, 2008
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.02.04
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.  
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.  
Line 60: Line 60:
| '''<Action Item>''' |Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible?
| '''<Action Item>''' |Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible?
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Participants>''' | Co-chairs
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 15, 2008
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.01.21
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Todd will add to Future Topics Agenda of Domain Cochairs.  
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Todd will add to Future Topics Agenda of Domain Cochairs.  
|-
| align="center" | 64
| '''<Action Item>''' |Initiate ACM waveform transmission profile
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd
| '''<Participants>''' | Ken
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 15, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Paul has an approach for reporting multiple numeric values, will be needed for next year’s cycle, moving date to Sept. Todd will check on prior submission to IHE cochairs. Ken has begun writing a brief profile proposal based upon HL7 for waveform communication (WCM) http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Brief_Profile_Proposal_2008_WCM. Todd will contact the ACM cochairs to initiate work on supplement. This is likely to be a stand alone profile that would first be applied to ACM, and the charter should indicate PCD’s desire to eventually support a continuous stream. Todd will add this data type in the TF update to SPD supplement to accommodate waveforms.


|-
|-
Line 79: Line 70:
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.  
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 15, 2008
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.01.21
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Need to get a version of PCD-01 in the MWB. PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. John sent one of the latest profiles to Pete - there were some significant issues identified that may need further TC discussion. Goal is to get PCD-01 working in MWB + NIST v2 tools, then vendor testing. Al will talk with Pete about the specifics of the problems. The goal is to identify any TF issues by 10/15 for resolution at the F2F. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete.
 
|-
| align="center" | 67
| '''<Action Item>''' | Weekly NIST Tooling Review/Feedback Sessions
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
| '''<Participants>''' | Todd Cooper, Jan Wittenber, Paul Schluter, NIST staff
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 1, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Schedule a weekly session to provide review / feedback to NIST on tooling considerations and revisions.
 
|-
| align="center" | 68
| '''<Action Item>''' | PCD White Papers Wiki session
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd Cooper
| '''<Participants>''' | .
| '''<Due Date>'''  | October 1, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Create a section in the wiki to support PCD white paper process & development
 
|-
| align="center" | 69
| '''<Action Item>''' | Update PCD Calendar
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd Cooper
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | November 12, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | PCD offered to move the TI publication date forward 2 weeks to 2009.05.15.
 
|-
| align="center" | 70
| '''<Action Item>''' | Survey RTM UoM issues
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul Schluter
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | November 12, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Several units of measurement to be reviewed and potentially "voted off the island". Paul will Doodle poll to accomplish this. A review of this new package was scheduled for 2008.10.08 after the weekly PCD meeting.
| '''<Comments>:'''  | PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. Goal is to get PCD-01 working in MWB + NIST v2 tools, then vendor testing. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo sent an email with this update: "Basically, the update is: we still need valid HL7 profiles (likely derived in Message Workbench [MWB]) for each of the ACM, PIV, and DEC (including the PIB and SPD supplements). I was/am hoping the companies (or leads on the profiles) have been working on getting correct HL7 (MWB) profiles. Companies were requested to post their profiles at: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Connectathons/Yr3-2009/Yr3-PreConnectathonTesting/ PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site]."
 
|-
| align="center" | 71
| '''<Action Item>''' | Ballot to use only L/min instead of that or L for Minute-volume.  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul Schluter
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  |
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | An email ballot is required: The vote to use only L/min instead of that or L for Minute-volume was not resolved.  
 
|-
| align="center" | 72
| '''<Action Item>''' | Post Paul's slides from F2F.
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Manny
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 11/19/08
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |


|-
|-
Line 141: Line 78:
| '''<Action Item>''' | Take the MSH-7 issue to HL7 for review and appropriate action on PAM  
| '''<Action Item>''' | Take the MSH-7 issue to HL7 for review and appropriate action on PAM  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd
| '''<Participants>''' | Dec. 1, 2008
| '''<Participants>''' | 2009.01.21
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
|-
| align="center" | 74
| '''<Action Item>''' | Address resolution of “Boolean” type arguments within RTM and will include results in Semantic Architecture White Paper.
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | November 19, 2008
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
Line 160: Line 88:
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | November 7, 2008
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.01.21
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
Line 169: Line 97:
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo, Manny
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo, Manny
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.01.21
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | We discussed a potential approach of how to validate messages and record them (in Kudu) for this current cycle (i.e., 2008-09).  This approach could be used for the Pre-Connectathon, Virtual-Connectathon, and Connectathon. To accommodate the RTM profile, which has no transactions, it was discussed to simply use the IHE-PCD PCD-01 transaction and a selected (set of?) test case(s) defined in the last cycle (2007 – 08) with a decided upon updated set of specific parameters. 11/5/2008
| '''<Comments>:'''  | A potential approach to validate messages and record them (in Kudu) for this current cycle (i.e., 2008-09)was discussed.  This approach could be used for the Pre-Connectathon, Virtual-Connectathon, and Connectathon. This test will likely be limited to the Virtual Connectathon. To accommodate the RTM profile, which has no transactions, the PCD-01 transaction and a selected (set of?) test case(s) defined in the last cycle (2007 – 08) with a decided upon updated set of specific parameters.  
 


|-
|-
Line 179: Line 106:
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Ken Fuchs
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Ken Fuchs
| '''<Participants>''' | Jeff Rinda, Gary Meyer   
| '''<Participants>''' | Jeff Rinda, Gary Meyer   
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.01.21
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Todd will check with Gary Meyer.


|-
|-
Line 204: Line 131:


== Participants ==
== Participants ==
'''placeholder'''


:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions)
:'''Chair:'''  Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)


: Alex Beechie, Jon Blasingame, Rick Cnossen, Brett Cohen, Bikram Day, Chip Furniss, John Garguilo, John Hotchkiss, Steve Merritt, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Jan Wittenber, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
: Anupriyo Chakravarti, Bikram Day, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Steve Merritt, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Jan Wittenber, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 224: Line 150:


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
|-
|-
| align="center" | 2
| align="center" | 2
| '''Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:''' Discussion Summaries of recent TC meetings, Minutes of F2F
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
:* Discussion Summary of previous TC meeting [[PCD_TC_2009-01-07_Webex | 2009.01.07 WebEx]] yielded no changes
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:*  
:*  
Line 234: Line 162:
|-
|-
| align="center" | 3
| align="center" | 3
| '''Brief Profile Proposals''' <br>- Chair
| '''PCD Profiles''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* John Rhoads, Steve Merritt are looking forward to having their detailed profile proposals ready Feb. 1.
:* Paul is working to harmonize the tags in the Rosetta table to reconcile them with IEEE IDC tables. This will be a topic for the RTM meeting on Jan. 28.
:* Next weeks RTM call will address the bed terminology, RTM tags, and Christof’s update.
:* Review of the votes to progress to Detailed Profile Proposals led to a recommendation to focus on WCM and postpone QBD.
:* Official validation of the votes to progress the Brief Profile Proposals to Detailed Profile Proposals awaits update of the committee voting roster. The outcome of the vote on all but two are not in doubt.
:* There is a 2 pm EST meeting today with Peter Rontey to resolve issues with the PCD HL7 2.5 MWB profile. This is an essential step toward NIST's development of the validation tool for the various PCD profiles.
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 4
| '''Orlando IEEE/HL7 Meeting''' <br>- Todd
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Todd noted that PCD was successful in getting 11073 terms (Rosetta), and terms developed by other organizations will be addressed by International Health Standards Organization, CDISC, SNOMED, and others in April.
:* Christof presented UCUM to the HL7 vocabulary group. He will now take the issue to ISO.
:* ICE PAC efforts were discussed in Orlando and on Monday of this week. Discussion confirmed that the effort was going in the right direction.
:* Meetings with HL7 about regulated drugs and devices addressed device id, regulation of clinical trials, … . The result was agnostic, not adequate for devices.
:* There may be an FDA call for a meeting about UDI on Feb. 12, http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/E9-784.htm  (TODD”S BD).
:* IDC pacemaker effort is going forward. If the Cardiology Domain doesn’t support this, PCD may be asked to do so.
:* NIST efforts were reviewed and addressed. John Garguilo demonstrated an early version of the RTM validation system. The ICS Generator will now permit addition of private profiles. A new version should be available Friday.
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
:* Action Item: John, Todd to contact Advamed to learn more.
 
|-
| align="center" | 5
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:*  
:* 60: Update TF - Change date to Feb. 4
:*  
:* 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations - Change date to Feb. 4
:* 66: Prepare profiles for registration -
:* 73: Take the MSH-7 PAM issue to HL7 -
:* 75: Review IHE.net TF page for accuracy re PCD entries - Move to Planning Committee
:* 76: RTM tests for the upcoming Connectathon, add the test to Kudu - Update to reflect that tests, if any, will be conducted as part of Virtual Connectathon testing.
:* 77: Ask HL7 to address gaps in v3 that affect PCD's ability to develop extensions to PIV - Change date to Feb. 4.
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 6
| '''Announcements''' <br>- All
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Ken updated the IHE/IEEE MOU. The ability to reference and include portions of  IEEE standards was added and the IEEE has accepted the added wording. The IHE Board will vote on this Feb. 12 and it will then be sent for formal approval to the IEEE. Kathleen Kush, the PCD IEEE liaison was at the Orlando meeting and the relationship appears solid.
:* HITSP Common Device Connectivity (CDC) Use Case Call for Participation: Todd recommended subscribing to this working group. To join send a note to Todd or John.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:*


|-
|-
| align="center" | 4
| align="center" | 7
| '''XYZ''' <br>- Todd
| '''PCD F2F Meeting''' <br>- Todd
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:*  
:* PCD F2F will take place either the week of April 20 or May 4. It will be a full week, extending it a couple of days to include the IEEE HL7 health WG on Thursday and Friday. This will precede or follow other international standards meetings.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''


|}
|}


== Next Meeting ==
== Next Meeting ==
''The next TC meeting will be Febuary __, 2009: _________________''
''The next TC meeting will be Febuary 4, 2009: [[PCD_TC_2009-02-04_Webex]]''


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category: PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 11:24, 18 March 2009

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly scheduled meeting of the PCD Technical Committee

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Weekly Tcons

Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1. Agenda Approval
2. Review Discussion Summaries
3. News / Announcements
  • Ballot Status Update
  • Orlando Reprise
  • Connectathon / Showcase Update
  • IHE-IEEE MoU Update
  • HITSP CDC Use Case Call for Participation
  • Spring F2F Discussion
4. Action Item Review
5. Profile Proposal Review
6. Rosetta Table Tag Harmonization (esp. w/ aECG)
7. Additional Business

Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Action Items from Jan. 7

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
60 Update TF Todd, Ken John Rhoads 2009.02.04 OPEN Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.

Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A Google Group has been established. Distribute the updated TF for use in this cycle’s implementation for the Connectathon. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF.

62 Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible? Todd Co-chairs 2009.01.21 OPEN Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Todd will add to Future Topics Agenda of Domain Cochairs.
66 Prepare profiles for registration. John Garguilo Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders. 2009.01.21 OPEN PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. Goal is to get PCD-01 working in MWB + NIST v2 tools, then vendor testing. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo sent an email with this update: "Basically, the update is: we still need valid HL7 profiles (likely derived in Message Workbench [MWB]) for each of the ACM, PIV, and DEC (including the PIB and SPD supplements). I was/am hoping the companies (or leads on the profiles) have been working on getting correct HL7 (MWB) profiles. Companies were requested to post their profiles at: PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site."
73 Take the MSH-7 issue to HL7 for review and appropriate action on PAM Todd 2009.01.21 OPEN
75 Review IHE.net TF page for accuracy re PCD entries. Todd 2009.01.21 OPEN
76 RTM tests for the upcoming Connectathon, add the test to Kudu. John Garguilo, Manny 2009.01.21 OPEN A potential approach to validate messages and record them (in Kudu) for this current cycle (i.e., 2008-09)was discussed. This approach could be used for the Pre-Connectathon, Virtual-Connectathon, and Connectathon. This test will likely be limited to the Virtual Connectathon. To accommodate the RTM profile, which has no transactions, the PCD-01 transaction and a selected (set of?) test case(s) defined in the last cycle (2007 – 08) with a decided upon updated set of specific parameters.
77 Ask HL7 to address gaps in v3 that affect PCD's ability to develop extensions to PIV. Ken Fuchs Jeff Rinda, Gary Meyer 2009.01.21 OPEN Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Todd will check with Gary Meyer.
78 OPEN
OPEN

Participants

Chair: Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)
Anupriyo Chakravarti, Bikram Day, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Steve Merritt, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Jan Wittenber, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 PCD Profiles
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • John Rhoads, Steve Merritt are looking forward to having their detailed profile proposals ready Feb. 1.
  • Paul is working to harmonize the tags in the Rosetta table to reconcile them with IEEE IDC tables. This will be a topic for the RTM meeting on Jan. 28.
  • Next weeks RTM call will address the bed terminology, RTM tags, and Christof’s update.
  • Review of the votes to progress to Detailed Profile Proposals led to a recommendation to focus on WCM and postpone QBD.
  • Official validation of the votes to progress the Brief Profile Proposals to Detailed Profile Proposals awaits update of the committee voting roster. The outcome of the vote on all but two are not in doubt.
  • There is a 2 pm EST meeting today with Peter Rontey to resolve issues with the PCD HL7 2.5 MWB profile. This is an essential step toward NIST's development of the validation tool for the various PCD profiles.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Orlando IEEE/HL7 Meeting
- Todd
Status/Discussion:
  • Todd noted that PCD was successful in getting 11073 terms (Rosetta), and terms developed by other organizations will be addressed by International Health Standards Organization, CDISC, SNOMED, and others in April.
  • Christof presented UCUM to the HL7 vocabulary group. He will now take the issue to ISO.
  • ICE PAC efforts were discussed in Orlando and on Monday of this week. Discussion confirmed that the effort was going in the right direction.
  • Meetings with HL7 about regulated drugs and devices addressed device id, regulation of clinical trials, … . The result was agnostic, not adequate for devices.
  • There may be an FDA call for a meeting about UDI on Feb. 12, http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/E9-784.htm (TODD”S BD).
  • IDC pacemaker effort is going forward. If the Cardiology Domain doesn’t support this, PCD may be asked to do so.
  • NIST efforts were reviewed and addressed. John Garguilo demonstrated an early version of the RTM validation system. The ICS Generator will now permit addition of private profiles. A new version should be available Friday.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • Action Item: John, Todd to contact Advamed to learn more.
5 Action Items
- Chairs
Status/Discussion:
  • 60: Update TF - Change date to Feb. 4
  • 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations - Change date to Feb. 4
  • 66: Prepare profiles for registration -
  • 73: Take the MSH-7 PAM issue to HL7 -
  • 75: Review IHE.net TF page for accuracy re PCD entries - Move to Planning Committee
  • 76: RTM tests for the upcoming Connectathon, add the test to Kudu - Update to reflect that tests, if any, will be conducted as part of Virtual Connectathon testing.
  • 77: Ask HL7 to address gaps in v3 that affect PCD's ability to develop extensions to PIV - Change date to Feb. 4.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Announcements
- All
Status/Discussion:
  • Ken updated the IHE/IEEE MOU. The ability to reference and include portions of IEEE standards was added and the IEEE has accepted the added wording. The IHE Board will vote on this Feb. 12 and it will then be sent for formal approval to the IEEE. Kathleen Kush, the PCD IEEE liaison was at the Orlando meeting and the relationship appears solid.
  • HITSP Common Device Connectivity (CDC) Use Case Call for Participation: Todd recommended subscribing to this working group. To join send a note to Todd or John.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

7 PCD F2F Meeting
- Todd
Status/Discussion:
  • PCD F2F will take place either the week of April 20 or May 4. It will be a full week, extending it a couple of days to include the IEEE HL7 health WG on Thursday and Friday. This will precede or follow other international standards meetings.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next TC meeting will be Febuary 4, 2009: PCD_TC_2009-02-04_Webex

PCD Home