DEV Domain F2F Oct 2020 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PaulSherman (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jrhoads (talk | contribs)
m move to 2020
 
(96 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category:DEV Meeting]]


{{TOCright}}
'''Please NOTE:  PLACEHOLDER AGENDA'''


Paul Sherman, PCD TPM
Paul Sherman, PCD TPM
Line 15: Line 9:
: These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the committees involved:
: These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the committees involved:
:* '''DEV Domain level Discussions'''
:* '''DEV Domain level Discussions'''
:* '''DPi Program Discussions'''
:* '''DEV PCD Program Discussion'''
:* '''PCD Program Discussion'''
:: Planning Committee:  Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
:: Planning Committee:  Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
:: Technical Committee:  Review and adopt brief profile proposals;Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.
:: Technical Committee:  Review and adopt brief profile proposals;Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.
:* '''PCH Program Discussions'''


== Location & General Schedule ==
== Location & General Schedule ==
Line 34: Line 25:


::: Monday :  Pump Working Group  
::: Monday :  Pump Working Group  
::: Tuesday : Joint PCD/PCHA meeting, PCD Planning Committee, PCH Meeting
::: Tuesday : Joint DEV Domain meeting (PCD+DPi+PCH), PCD Planning Committee
::: Wednesday : PCD Planning and Technical Committees, PCH Meeting
::: Wednesday : PCD Planning and Technical Committees
::: Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee
::: Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee
::: Friday, : PCD Technical Committee
::: Friday, : PCD Technical Committee
Line 46: Line 37:


:* 11:15 - 13:00    Session #2
:* 11:15 - 13:00    Session #2
'''Updated 8/10/2020 PRS'''


== Agenda Suggestions ==
== Agenda Suggestions ==
Line 54: Line 42:
Please submit suggestions for agenda topics here or through emails to the committee co-chairs.
Please submit suggestions for agenda topics here or through emails to the committee co-chairs.


From the PC Action Items [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
From the DEV PCD PC Action Items [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
 
:  No current open Action Items


: 172  DEV Domain Implementation
From the DEV PCD TC Action Items: [[PCD Technical Committee Action Items]]:
: 173  Update TF for DEV Domain


From the TC Action Items: [[PCD Technical Committee Action Items]]:
: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
Line 73: Line 61:
Please note: the log in and phone number for each meeting is the same as for our WG meetings. The password is included in the email sent to participants.  These are not provided here for security reasons (this is a public Wiki page).
Please note: the log in and phone number for each meeting is the same as for our WG meetings. The password is included in the email sent to participants.  These are not provided here for security reasons (this is a public Wiki page).


The HIMSS Webex page is [[https://himss.webex.com/ HIMSS Webex]]
The IHE Webex page is [[https://ihe.webex.com/ IHE Webex]]


:PCD Meetings
:DEV PCD Meetings


:- Monday, October 1: Pump WG: Meeting Number:  
:- Monday, October 5: DEV PCD Pump WG: Meeting Number:     145 575 8268


:- Tuesday, Oct 2: DEV joint and PC: Meeting Number:  
:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint, followed by DEV PCD PC: Meeting Number:     145 230 3641


:- Wednesday Oct 3: Joint PC&TC and TC: Meeting Number:  
:- Wednesday Oct 7: Joint DEV PCD PC&TC and TC: Meeting Number:     145 257 7058


:- Thursday Oct 4: TC: Meeting Number:  
:- Thursday Oct 8: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number:     145 546 3377


:- Friday, Oct 5: TC: Meeting Number:  
:- Friday, Oct 9: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number:     145 767 6035


: PCH Meetings:
: PCH Meetings:


:- Tuesday, Oct 2: Meeting Number:
:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
 
:- Wednesday, Oct 3: Meeting Number:
 
:- Thursday Oct 4: Meeting Number:  


:- Friday, Oct 5: Meeting Number:
: DPi Meetings:


:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
'''Updated 8/10/2020 PRS'''
'''Updated 8/10/2020 PRS'''


== Attachments / Materials ==
== Attachments / Materials ==


Documents related to the meeting '''when available '''will be found at the [[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rYUd1gk-IP2I93DSFMGeKr-lLQgWKLMS New Devices Google Drive]] unless otherwise noted. Documents are available without a password.
Documents related to the meeting '''when available '''will be found at the [[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PeXFtKFCyj9UWRj1h5QpyJR1ty1rWYix Devices Google Drive]] unless otherwise noted. Documents are available without a password.


Schedule/Deadlines: [[Patient Care Device]] and [[Domain Milestones]]
Schedule/Deadlines: [[Patient Care Device]] and [[Domain Milestones]]
Line 112: Line 97:




=== Monday, October 1 (Pump Workgroup) ===
=== Monday, October 5 (PCD Pump Workgroup) ===




Line 126: Line 111:
| align="center" | '''Monday'''
| align="center" | '''Monday'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 1:00
| align="center" | 09:00 - 1:00
| align="center" | Pump workgroup
| align="center" | PCD Pump workgroup
|
|
::
::
:* Morning (09:00-2:00)
:* Morning (09:00-1:00)
::* Introductions - Kurt
::* Introductions - Kurt
::* Agenda review - Kurt
::* Agenda review - Kurt
Line 135: Line 120:
:::
:::
::* 9:15
::* 9:15
:::MEMDMC terms for pumps - 30 min
:::Pump Terms containment model update - 1.5hr
::::2020-02-24.DMC.1d.2020-03-30T16.IPv4-IPv6.xls
::::Are all terms correct and unambiguous?
:::::https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DTGH766Q5dOoeL2kM3JRjbjkH9KE9Gup
::::Identify any missing comments/descriptions for terms.
:::MEMDMC Battery status - 30 min
::::Identify any deprecated/withdrawn terms.
::::2020-02-24.DMC.1d.2020-03-30T16.IPv4-IPv6.xls
::::Decision on readiness of terms for IEEE 10101b
:::::https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DTGH766Q5dOoeL2kM3JRjbjkH9KE9Gup
::
::
:::Bolus from existing Infusion - 30 min
::* Break (10:45-11:00)
::
:::PCD-10 question
::* Break (10:55-11:05)
:::
:::
:::Pump Terms containment model update - 1.5hr
:::
:::Pump alert/alarm events - 30 min
:::ACM state changes - 30 min
:::Mapping of detailed pump events to broader 11073 terms - 30 min
:::
:::
::::
::::
::::
::::
:* 1:00 > Meeting Adjournment
:* 1:00 > Meeting Adjournment
|-   
|-   
Line 161: Line 137:
|}
|}


=== Tuesday Oct 2, 2020 ===
=== Tuesday Oct 6, 2020 ===




Line 175: Line 151:
|-
|-
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 1:00
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00
| Joint IHE Devices Meeting
| Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting
|
|
:* 09:00 > [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (Kurt)
:* 09:00 > [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (Kurt)
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
:* 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
:* 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
:* 10:35 > Subdomain Reports (20 minutes each)
:* 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
:: PCD
:: 09:30 PCD
:: PCH
:: 09:50 PCH
:: DPI
:: 10:10 DPI
:* 10:50 > Next steps and wrap up
 
:* 11:00 > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting
:* IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
 
:* Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
 
:* Domain Discussions
:: Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.)  (Paul Sherman)
 


|-
|-
Line 197: Line 179:
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 2'''
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 2'''
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
| PCD Planning Committee (PC)
| Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting Continued
|
|


:* 11:15 > Start PC meeting
:* 11:15 >
:* Introduction
:: New Proposals
::- [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (5 minutes)(Kurt)
::- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
::- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
:: PCH- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]
:: '''General PCD Work Program Review''' (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
:: DEV PC Action Items: [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/DEV_Planning_Committee_Action_Items DEV PC Action Items]
::- ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- 002 Board Review
::- MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- 003 Wiki Web Updates
::- MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
::: Ballot currently open - results or finish vote (Michael)
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
:: Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
::- RTM (Paul Schluter)
::- If Virtual
::- Vent (Paul Schluter)
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
::- PIV (Jeff R)
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
::- Pump (Kurt, Jeff R.)
::: Thurs AM TC
::- IPEC (Kurt)
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
::- PCIM (John R)
::- If Live
::- Physio monitor (John R)
::: Tuesday Pump WG
::- DEC
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
:::* General update PCD TF) (John R)
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
:::* DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
::- EC (John R)
:* 12:45 > Next steps and wrap up
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
:* 13:00 > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting
::: Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
:: None as of 8/10/2020


: 1:00 > Adjourn Planning Committee meeting
'''updated 10/02/2020'''
 
'''updated 08/10/2020'''


|}
|}


=== Wednesday Oct 3, 2020 ===
=== Wednesday Oct 7, 2020 ===




Line 249: Line 225:
|
|


:* 09:00 > Joint PC/TC meeting
:* 09:00 > Joint DEV PCD PC/TC meeting


:* Introduction
:* Introduction
Line 255: Line 231:
::- Review & Approve Joint PC&TC Agenda (Kurt)
::- Review & Approve Joint PC&TC Agenda (Kurt)


 
:* Five year plan  
:* '''IHE International Board - Update & Feedback''' (Todd)
 
:* Review 2020 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
 
:* '''Five year plan'''
:: No current plan
:: No current plan
::- [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE-PCD_Roadmap_F2F_2017-04-04.xls 2017 Roadmap]
::- [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE-PCD_Roadmap_F2F_2017-04-04.xls 2017 Roadmap]
Line 267: Line 238:
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.


:* '''Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F'''
:* Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F
 
:*  Continue Joint PC/TC F2f meeting?


Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting.
: Adjourn Joint DEV PCD PC&TC meeting.


|-
|-
Line 279: Line 252:
| align="center" | '''Thursday Pt. 2'''  
| align="center" | '''Thursday Pt. 2'''  
| align="center" | 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM
| align="center" | 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM
| PCD Technical Committee (TC)
| DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
|
 
: 11:30 >  Start DEV PCD PC meeting
:* Introduction
::- [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (5 minutes)(Kurt)
::- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
:: General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
::- ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
::- RTM (Paul Schluter)
::- Vent (Paul Schluter)
::- PIV (Kurt)
::- IPEC (Kurt)
::- Pump (Kurt)
::- PCIM (John R)
::- Physio monitor (John R)
::- DEC
:::* General update PCD TF) (John R)
:::* DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
::- EC (John R)
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
::: Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
::  None as of 9/30/2020
 
: Adjourn Planning Committee meeting
 
'''Updated 10/02/2020  PRS'''
|}
 
=== Thursday Oct 8, 2020 ===
 
 
:{|border="2"
|-
! width="10%"  align="center" |Quarter
! width="10%"  align="center" |Time
! width="20%"  align="center" |Lead
!              align="center" |Agenda Items
 
|-
| align="center" | '''Thursday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00 AM
|  
|  
|


: 11:30 > Open PCD Technical Committee (TC)
:* 09:00 > COpen DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
:: TC Welcome and Agenda Review (Tom Kowalczyk)
:: TC Welcome and Agenda Review (Tom Kowalczyk)
:: Announcement – Decision Making meeting (TC Co-Chairs)
:: Announcement – Decision Making meeting (TC Co-Chairs)


:: Proposals -
:* DEV PCD Program review:


 
:: ACM (Monroe P)
:* PCD Program review:
:: MEM DMC (Monroe P)
 
:: MEM LS (Monroe P)
:: ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
:: MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
:: MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
:: DEC (John R)
:: DEC (John R)
:: EC (John R)
:: EC (John R)
:: IPEC (Al E, Jeff R)
:: PIV (Kurt)
:: PIV (Al E)
:: IPEC (Kurt)
:: Pump (Al E, Jeff R.)
:: Pump (Kurt)
:: DPI  (John R)
:: DPI  (John R)
:: Physio monitor (John R)
:: Physio monitor (John R)
:: PCIM (John R)
:: PCIM (John R)
:: Vent (Paul Schluter)
:: Vent (Paul Schluter)
:: IDCO (Paul Schluter)
:: IDCO (Alexander Kraus)
:: RTM (Paul Schluter)  
:: RTM (Paul Schluter)  
::  Quiet Hospital
::  Quiet Hospital


:- Standards Coordination
|-
:: IEEE 11073 SC & PARs & EMBS SC (mobile, IoT, AI/ML)
| align="center" | '''Break'''
:: HL7
| align="center" | 11:00 - 11:15 AM
:: Devices on FHIR
|
|
|-
| align="center" | '''Thursday, Pt. 2'''
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
| DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
|
 
:*11:15 > Continued topic discussions
 
: PCD TC Action item review
 
:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]
 
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements
:: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional


'''updated 8/10/2020 PRS'''
|}
|}


=== Thursday Oct 4, 2020 ===
=== Friday, Oct 9, 2020 ===
 


:{|border="2"  
:{|border="2"  
Line 327: Line 360:
|-
|-
| align="center" | '''Friday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | '''Friday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:15 AM
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00 AM
|  
|  
|
|


:* 09:00 > Continue TC Meeting
:* 09:00 > Additional Topics
 
: TC Action item review
 
:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]
 
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements
:: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
 
:* 09:45 > RTM and IEEE P11073-10101b draft standard  (Paul Schluter)
:: Overview of where we are and process to begin “ballot group formation” for IEEE P11073-10101b
 
:* 10:45 > Containment modeling  (Paul Schluter)
:: Key items needed for more rigorous message definition and validation, focusing on containment trees and essential next steps to improve IHE PCD DEC HL7 V2 message conformance testing.
 


|-
|-
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
| align="center" | 11:15 - 11:30 AM
| align="center" | 11:00 - 11:15 AM
|
|
|  
|  
|-
|-
| align="center" | '''Friday, Pt. 2'''  
| align="center" | '''Friday, Pt. 2'''  
| align="center" | 11:30 AM - 2:00 PM
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
| PCD Technical Committee (TC)
| DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
|  
|  


:*11:30 > Continued topic discussions
:*11:15 > Continued topic discussions


:: RTMMS update given by NIST contractor Michael Faughn


: F2F Action Review (from this week)
: F2F Action Review (from this week)


:- '''DEV'''
:- DEV - PCD Program
:: Proposed agendas for Fall F2F
:: If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F


::- If Virtual
::- If Virtual
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
::: Wed AM PC
::: Thurs AM TC
::: Thurs AM TC
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
Line 377: Line 393:
::- If Live
::- If Live
::: Tuesday Pump WG
::: Tuesday Pump WG
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
::: Wed AM PC
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV


:: '''PC'''
:: PC
::
 
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads
 
: Five Year Plan - Do we still need it?  Review at next PC meeting.
 
: Next F2F -
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
:*  Plan on virtual, hope for F2F


:: '''PC&TC'''


:: '''TC'''
:: TC
::
::




:* > TC Meeting Wrap up and Adjournment (Kowalczyk)
:* > TC Meeting Wrap up and Adjournment (Fournier)
 


|}
|}




Line 403: Line 423:




'''Tuesday, April 21'''
'''Monday Oct 5'''
: Kurt Elliason(Smiths Medical), Al Engelbert (BBraun), Andrea Robertson (Smiths Medical), Bill Haralson(Smiths Medical), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Christophe Fournier (Fresenius), Jeff Rinda (ICU Medical), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Nathan Berg (Smiths Medical), Paul Schluter (CMI), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun), Michael Faughn(Prometheus), Dalibor Pokrajac(GuardRFID), John Krupka
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
:'''Participants:'''  '' Al Engelbert (BBraun), Ali Nakoulima (Cerner), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Christophe Fournier (Fresenius), Jeff Rinda (Interoperability Solutions), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Paul Schluter (CMI), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun)  


'''Tuesday, Oct 6'''
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
: '''Participants:''' Jacob Anderson, Todd Cooper, Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Thom Erickson, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Timon Grob,  Jorn, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Koichiro Matsumoto, Eric Moll, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Martin Rosner, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski


'''Wednesday, April 22'''
'''Wednesday, Oct 7'''
Todd Cooper, Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Thom Erickson, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Bill Harrelson, Dan Kernan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Marufur Rahman, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Kumi Terai, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
: '''Participants:''' Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski


'''Thursday, Oct 8'''


'''Thursday, April 23'''
:'''Chair:'''  
Todd Cooper, Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Thom Erickson, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Bill Harrelson, Dan Kernan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Marufur Rahman, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Kumi Terai, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski
:'''Participants:'''


'''Friday, April 24'''
'''Friday, Oct 9'''
Nicholas Crouzier, Kurt Elliason, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Bill Harrelson, Dan Kernan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufur Rahman, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski
:'''Chair:'''
:'''Participants:'''


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 421: Line 448:
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.


=== Tuesday Pump WG Meeting ===
=== Monday Pump WG Meeting ===




Line 443: Line 470:
|-
|-
| align="center" | 2
| align="center" | 2
| '''MEMDMC terms for pumps and MEMDMC Battery status''' <br>  
| '''Pump Terms containment model update''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:Added MDS terms to VMD as optional if there multiple modules.
:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rN5x8Uhlj6s8qIoExzaS1EyfrpgfvCZt/edit
:MDC_ATTR_ID_SOFT term needs to be checked.  Looked in 10201 for definition.
::Comments added to Review Comments tab in spreadsheet
:From 10201 "Soft-Id. MDC_ATTR_ID_SOFT. OCTET STRING. Settable, e.g., hospital inventory number."
::Identified some missing terms/descriptions.  
:
::Deprecated/to be withdrawn terms have been removed from Model already, Brian has a list that has been added to spreadsheet as new tab
:Discussion of battery terms, Dalibor expressed need for Low battery indication. We have terms for Battery charge level and time remaining.  Also have events for battery low and depleted that could be used.
:::Deprecated terms needs to be reviewed by everyone, need to add replacement terms for each deprecated term.  
::Decision on readiness of terms for IEEE 10101b - getting closer, still need to finish a few updates based on questions/comments.




|-
|-
| align="center" | 3
| align="center" | 3
| '''Bolus from existing Infusion''' <br>
| '''PCD-10 question Flush event''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:Given Clinician Bolus (CH)
::Need clarification on whether the ‘O’ on Bolus from existing infusion table should really be ‘X’
:::Should be 'O', since some EMR vendors always send TQ1. 
::Confirm: MDCX_INFUSION_PROGRAM_TYPE to be used to signify type, while RXG-15/16, TQ1, and MDC_FLOW_FLUID_PUMP to define values
::Need clarification on what MDCX_INFUSION_PROGRAM_TYPE “continuous” is expected to be used for -- Need CP  Should be OBX-3  with enumeration of "clinician dose"
:Titration (XO)
::Remove “not valid for PCA”  means not valid for PCA device type, revisit in the future if it should be for PCA Basal rate only. Need input from EMR vendors.  Typically a change to a PCA pump would be a new order.
 
:Intermittent Bolus
::Need these segments available for PCD-03
:::              MDC_TIME_PD_DOSE_START_INTERVAL
:::              MDCX_TIME_PROG_NEXT_DOSE
:::              MDCX_TIME_REMAIN_NEXT_DOSE
:::              Need clarification on whether “MDC_TIME_PD_PROG” is needed
:defer to pump terms discussion later today
 
 
|-
| align="center" | 4
| '''Pump Terms containment model update''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:Brian working with a MongoDB.  Created a pump MDS containment generator  supports 01, 10, need to add 03. Could support others
:PCD-10 question on Flush event, MDC_EVT_STAT_LINE_FLUSH.
:could put it on a website so the group can review and comment
::IPEC has very specific events defined, this could be a PCD-01 event but would not be a PCD-10 event.




|-
|-
| align="center" | 5
| align="center" | 5
| '''Pump alert/alarm events and Mapping of detailed pump events to broader 11073 terms''' <br>
| '''Next meeting''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
: Reviewed content of ListParSrcEvt.3o.x3u.2020-04-20T16.P3-expanded-displayText.xls
: Targeting August to start ballot process
:Would like description of infusion pump for standard.  Dialysis has 8 page description
 
|-
| align="center" | 6
| '''ACM state changes''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:Need to make sure REFIDs work well with state machines
: Decided to hold next pump WG meeting on Oct 26th, will cancel Oct 12th.
::: Brian working on FHIR based approach to programming pumps  - will add to agenda for discussion on the 26th
::: Christophe will prepare some examples of messages using the Model for review on the 26th.


:Pump WG F2F meeting adjourned at 10:30




Line 504: Line 506:
|}
|}


=== Wednesday Joint PCD/PCHA Meeting Summary ===
=== Tuesday DEV Domain Meeting Summary ===


:{|border="2"  
:{|border="2"  
Line 517: Line 519:
:  Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
:  Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
:  Introductions and Agenda Review
:  Introductions and Agenda Review
:
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
: Agenda approved   
: Agenda approved   
Line 527: Line 529:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  


: DEV Domain Mar 25, 2020  [[DEV Joint 2020-03-25 Webex]]


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:
'''Action(s):'''


|-
|-
Line 540: Line 537:




:* 08:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
 
:* Program Reports
:: PCD
::- Quiet Hospital (Rob)
:::  Constant progress, discussing some changes, esp with ACM.  Some changes underway.  Lot of Definition progress.  Word is getting out very well via a HIMSS video.  Pla to have presentations witrh SDPi and ACM included at the HIMSS Showcase.
::- Pumps (Brian)
::: Terminology updating underway.  Formalizing new termss and cleaning up existing terms.  New spreadsheet with containment model hierarchy.  Michael Faughn asking a lot of good questions.  Hope to get it out for review and then inclusion in 10101b.
 
:: PCH (Thom)
::- Slide deck on Google Drive.
::-  Promotional Activities – Blog series came out.  Participated in FHIR Dev Days, will join the November session as well.  IHE Webinar, video on Youtube.  Participated in HIMSS Europe 2020.
::- Preparing Program Value proposition for customers.
::- Working with IEEE-PHD to simplify the information model.  Working on 2nd draft – will have BT info to develop a generic sensor profile.  Close to BARB (Bluetooth Architecture Review Board) review.
::- D2C constrained Implementation (Brief Proposal prepared to vote on today)
::- Mobile Health Apps – styill in queue
::- Test and Tools – Gazelles, POU Profiles and Remote Testing capabilities.
::- Project Gemini Participation – Info in slides.
::- PCHA Code report – Goal to connect any medical devices to any EMR.
::- Surveyed builders – Got to 300-400 people, will wrap up in a couple of weeks.
:: 10:10 DPI (Ken)
::- Had about 2-3 meetings focused on Brief Profile Proposal.  Still getting organized and moving forward.
 
:* Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
:: 2020 – TF in final stages, will be published soon
:: 2021 – Looking format similar to ITI, rather than hard dates, would make us more nimble.  Monroe – need to check with Mary on how it will affect her workload.  DEV Cochairs will take this forward as an ‘’’Action Item’’’
 
:* Domain Discussions
:: Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.)  (Paul Sherman)
::- Thom – Do things at the program level as much as possible.  Rob – CPs at program level, but communicate at Domain level.  Quiet Hospital is a good example PCD work that affects DPi is a good example.  Unless it’s at the governance level, we may not need Domain action.  Rob will assemble some notes for review at DEV Cochairs ’’’Action Item’’’
 
:: New Proposals
::- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA) (Todd)
::: Been circulated within Dpi and DEV for review.  A 10 year journey to get here.
::: How to leverage existing standards to create a DEV Porofile (Add transactions and Actors).  MDIRA leverages existing ICE work.
::: Talk about data logger – how will we get the data out of the logger?  No guidance on that yet.  Dialysis is using the HL7 v2 ‘Batch’ function – it works very well.  There is a lot of work available that can help.
:::  Are there actual devices that are using or planning on using this?  Yes, it’s a DoD funded project; there is a pump and couple of monitors that are using it.  2-3 pump companies are preparing to implement it.  The plan is to have it open source.  Big question – is this addressing problems already solved?  It is focused on solutions that provide value.
:::  Todd displayed MDIRA website and link.  Discussed process, monetization and open source nature of the product.
::: Motion proposed (Christophe), Second (Rob) – approved.
 
::- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]  (Thom and Michael)
::: Figure out to have a small device send info in a low coverage area without the battery running down fast.  Touches on a number of standards for leverage. 
::: Proposal voted on and approved.
::: Discussion of process for detailed proposal.  Can be close to TI or just a bit more detailed.  Other members will help with that work.
 
::- Motions will be posted on the meeting folder and the current cycle folder.
 
:: DEV PC Action Items: [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/DEV_Planning_Committee_Action_Items DEV PC Action Items]
::- 002 Board Review
::- 003 Wiki Web Updates
::: Todd has some more to do yet, re-open and set to Oct 27
::- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot. 
::: Closed, slate approved
::: Paul and Michael will formalize IHE notification.
 
:: Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
::- Propose April for meeting month.  Not week of
::- Discussion regarding virtual vs. F2F, a lot depends on HIMSS support commitment.  Concerns about HIMSS support coordination. 
::- Will
::- If Virtual
::: Monday Pump WG
::: Tues PCD PC
::: Wed Joint PC/TC and TC
::: Thurs TC
::: Friday Joint DEV
::- If Live
::: Tuesday Pump WG
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
 
:: Discussion of HIMSS conference and Use Case presentations.
::- Rob discussed their recent experience with the virtual showcase.  Discussion on process and plans for the August HIMSS conference Showcase.
 
:* IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
:- January – update on Global Consortium at ONC conference.  HL7, HIMSS, PCH Alliance and IHE pledge to cooperate.  Consortium formed and will start to leverage strength.  May hear some noise about IHE and FHIR ‘taking over the world’; not the case, taking advantage our work and support it.  Work and coordination, specs, testing happens in IHE (Gemini Project), Consortium is interested in promoting and encouraging work forward and creating publicity and awareness.  Is it all about FHIR?  There was a lot of discussion.  HL7 is highly focused on FHIR, though most work is in V2. 
:- Membership is strong, a lot due to DEV.
:-  IHE Europe Connectathon is virtualized (early November)  Cost is about the same due to platform work.  Plugathon coming up as well.  Plan to leverage this work for the NA Connectathon.  NA Connectathon is rescheduled for March now.  Showcase will be part of August HIMSS conference.
Any details on when we’ll get info on the NA Connectathon?  Likely nothing until after the European Connectathon.


:* Subdomain Reports
:- Discussion of Showcase presentations and virtual vs. liveCost estimates? TomTook 5 months to prep, physical device expenses, software costs were minimal.   May be an advantage to prep for virtual; live conversion costs wouldn’t be overwhelmingGetinge sponsored a lot of the work, so those expenses were minimizedMore support from HIMSS would help this a lotIt’s easier to pivot from virtual to F2F vs. the other directionDo we, or can we assemble a ‘lesson learned’ document to take back to IHE and HIMSS Tom and Todd will work on it. ‘’’DEV Action Item’’’ Review at DEV Leadership call Oct 27.
:: Presentations will be on the ftp site.
:: PCD -
::- Many products using DEC profile.  IPEC moved into FT.  Provided summary of Profile’s progress.  Discussing sterilizer Profile.  10101B – terms under review for update and balloting. Working a lot on Quiet Hospital, had planned demos at HIMSS2020SDPi and Quiet Hospital groups merged, this is going very well.  Looking for regulatory and clinical input. Discussed ECRI participation.  MEM – looking at remote command/control.  Will update our report for DEV – Need to meet and discuss how to proceed
:: PCH
::- POU
::: TF published, wiki launched.
::- Paul Sherman and Mary are working on DEV page redirects as needed.
::- Working on Direct to Cloud operation, lightweight DIM. 
::- Reviewed Direct to Cloud; stack, simplified DIM and prototype protocol stack.
::: Simplified DIM: looking to simplify for personal health devices, could move beyond to D2C and Bluetooth LEHope to have best of both worldsCurrently under Board of Directors review.  IEEE group discussed this on Monday, will want to review/change model titleStill looking at how to change it in official PAR.  Will need to review and discuss further.
::: Mobile Health apps – Not yet launched and working on the charter.  Looking to involve new participants (Apple, etc.)
::- Test and Tools
::: Maintenance release in May,  Gazelle integration complete.  Some other items pending funding.
::- Marcom reviewDeveloped common message, feel free to use or share it. Wrote a number of blogs, ID markets, ID’d vendors to represent, collaborate with Global eHealth Consortium..  Discussed comms strategy.  Discussed reporting this to Board.
:: DPI
::- Rebranding HL7 to HL7 Device Workgroup.  Balklot closes 4/26.
::- Launched WP last April, finished Oct.  Ken summarized history and flow.  Question on using going forward, more of a living document.
::- Reviewed ISO/IEEE 11073 SDC
::- Reviewed/highlighted Use Cases.  In process is Remote Monitoring during COVID-!9 response. (FDA initiated).
::- SDPi Supplement Developing 4 profiles, include TF 1, 2, and 3 material and testing at Korean CN.  Profiles are Plug and Play, Repoorting, Alerting, External Control.
::- Reviewed Supplement Developement.  Will build on existing momentum, SDPi 1.0 foundation, work streams/teams, then white papers.
::- Presented/recorded HIMSS presentation, will share link when it’s available.
::- Proposed Joint Joint HL7-IHE Gemini Program.  Deliverables – SDPi Supplement, HL7 DoF IG, and joint white papers.  Goal – Leverage the resources to create deployable products that are regulatory compliant.
::- Create a set of Collaboration Tooling.
::- Question about Military/Disaster casualty care.  How to decide where to evacuate to?  That is part of  this process, but not the main focus.
::  Link to [[https://ainq.com/ai-launches-the-saner-project/ Saner Project]]  as discussed.
:*  DEV Domain Guidance and AOB (15 minutes)
:: Feedback from Kevin O'Donnell
::- He’s voiced some concerns on how we’re organizing,, but has no specific info on what we’re violatingTodd has asked for specifics, no response.  He’ll ask again.  Could be sour grapes or fear of change.  We should proceed.
::- Ballot – Create Tiger Team to address remaining items finalizing DEV structure.  Passed unanimously.   Todd will convene the group
:: IEEE P2733 Overview
::- View unavailable, Ken reviewing verbally.  Slides will be available.  Group struggling to find its way forward. 
:: Move future DEV meeting to end of F2F?
::- Some discussion, will bear in mind


:* Next steps and wrap up
:- Role of IHE with other orgs – Making slow but consistent progress.  Seems to be at a good pace.  Project Gemini components are easier to understand than prior efforts. Confluence helps, Rob recommends we adopt it. ONC funded project to get IHE published same level as HL7, making progress, though still heavily FHIR focused.
:: DEV Tiger Team – Todd will start that.


Adjourn Joint DEV Committee (PC)
:* Github discussion:  Make sure which CPs need integrated to Github.  John R – Cps
::  Draft 2020 TF prep.  Make a DEV Committee ‘’’Action Item’’’, due Oct 28.


:* Next steps and wrap up
::  Milestone process review
::  Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
::  Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
::  Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
::  DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
::  Github update
:* > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
: New Proposals
:* DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
:: Approved
:* PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]
:: Approved


'''Action(s):'''


'''Action(s):'''
::  Milestone process review
::  Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
::  Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
::  Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
::  DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
::  Github update




|}
|}


=== Wednesday PC Meeting Summary ===
=== Wednesday DEV PCD PC Meeting Summary ===


:{|border="2"  
:{|border="2"  
Line 627: Line 688:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''


:: '''General PCD Work Program Review''' (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
:: General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
::- ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- ACM (Rob W and Monroe P)
::: Current status; In FT, 19 vendors at Connectathon, Showcase cancelled.
::: Rather quiet, most work associated with Quiet Hospital.  Reviewing a couple of Cps, another may be  created.  One is addressing some PCD-05 updates.  Likely 3 Cps before CN, focus on PCD-05 content; CN testing showed some enhancements were needed. Found some HL7 non-compliance.  NIST tool looks for some content and format, but not specific contentMarket penetration is increasing, some Non IHE vendors asked Rob if SPOK was compliant.
::: Quiet Hospital and SPDi merged, 34 members 10 organizations.   
::- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
::: Lab results and Rad Workflow pushed to 2021
::: No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TI.  Getting some interest in this profile.
::- MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
::- MEM LS (Monroe P)
::: TI, in Connectatrhons No updates planned this cycle
::: No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TI. IEEE still planning to use HL7 for upper communication layerIEEE wants to know who to contact for agreeing to them using it.  Todd may be a good source to check.  Dalibor will check with him.  John R. - There may be a copyright acknowledgement needed, check with Todd or Mary Jungers.
::- MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
::: TI, in Connectatrhons No updates planned this cycle
::- RDC – still out thereNot much work, but white paper is available.
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
::: Not a lot of news, vendors have implemented.  Nomenclature will be able to support vent info.
::: Nothing major.  
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
::: Meeting each Friday and updatingWorking with Heart Rhythm Society EMR vendorsHope to be at Connectathon, will work with Paul Sherman to prep.
::: Very good progressClose to drafting textMany hope to attend NA Connectathon.
::- RTM (Paul Schluter)
::- RTM (Paul Schluter)
::: Summary, more detail at TCSignificant 10101b update, everything not in gray will have codes.  Asked vendors to supply event stringsThree vendors contributed so far, helpful infoWorking with Dialysis vendors to get terms into 10101bFormalized MEM DMC termsNurse call and beds are moving along, but not ready to add to the list.
::: Very good pump term progress, due to Brians updatesOnce finalized can add codes to them and MEMDMC termsDialysis is in very good shape, a full profileIncludes TF and master spreadsheet with all needed terms, trees, models, etcIncludes six major vendorsOnce pumps and dialysis done, can have a balloit.   
::: 10101b – Talked to IEEE Steering Committee and staff.  Hope to have ballot ready late AugustHope we can join and participate.  An invitation will go out late summer, please join.
::- Vent (Paul Schluter)
::- Vent (Paul Schluter) – Keep adding terms, hoping to get more and add them to the terms.
:::  Working with Getinge on their products.  Also working on vent modes, can include ISO 223 mode strings.
::- PIV (Kurt, for Jeff R) – Not a lot going onHave some minor tweaks due.  1 or 2 CPs
::- PIV (Kurt)
::- Pump (Kurt, Jeff R.) - A lot of MEMDMC terms, most not pump specific.  Collecting a lot of alarm events, some specific ones.
:::  No major changes this cycleCP to clean up some terms
::- IPEC (Kurt) – Final Text, in Technical Framework.  Can work on other Profiles.
::- IPEC (Kurt)
::- PCIM (John R) – On hold, limited resources right nowDiscussing, possible that HL7 v2 won’t quite address needs.  FHIR may be a better fit.  Some work by Ioana, but doesn’t quite fit our needs.
::: FT, no changes
::- Physio monitor (John R) – Continual flow of input capabilities, managed in terminology managementWill want to look at it as we rethink TF organizationMay want to enrich physio monitoring terms.
::- Pump (Kurt)
:::  Finalizing terms, pretty stable otherwise.
::- PCIM (John R)
:::  Dormant for a while, but coming back to life.  A couple of vendors are interestedSome of the original members have moved on, hope some new staff there may be interestedUnlike other work, very like FHIR work, so may be a better fit.  V2 query handling is ugly, FHIR handles them much better.
::- Physio monitor (John R)
:::  VERY stable solid foundation laid 2004-006Very good fit, haven’t needed to modify it much.  Could work on V3 for data managementSome FHIR work; won’t replace V2, but once data is in the ecosystem, FHIR can help enable distribution.
::- DEC  
::- DEC  
:::* General update PCD TF) (John R) – Pretty stable, new capabilities pretty well covered.  Exercised well in Connectathons.
::: General update PCD TF) (John R)
:::* DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C) – A lot of advances, in good position to leverage that work into FHIR implementation.  Planning Korean Connectathon, will work with them for a CP to implement itNot a lot of work, will be able to claim FHIR implementation across whole Domain.
:::- Some
::- EC (John R) - ‘Parent’ of IPEC.   
::: DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
:::- Bridging HL7 to IHELot of work by Moerkhe and others to provide FHIR equivalence.
::- EC (John R)
::: Event Communication – Generalized framework for dealing with events.  Much of it is addressed in other Profiles, especially ACM.  Generalized for none Alert info, can use ACM infrastructure.  IPEC is specialized EC, prototype for EC.  MEMDMC provides device focused events.  We are good at consistent implementation in those Profiles, this is available for other useTom – Is there a need for generic EC?  Can John’s comments be put in V2 to address it?  A White Paper would have limited exposure.  Paul Sc - 10101B nails it an intermediate level.  John will draft it as an addition to the TF and send out for review and input.  '''new Action Item'''
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
::: Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.  Needs formattingDevelopers don’t wish to move it into FTJohn is willing to help when he has the time.
::: Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.  PCD determined that originator prepares FTIt’s tested, so ready, but the creators haven’t been interested doing the work so far.  John will help as bandwidth allows, which it hasn’tOthers are welcome to help as well.  Remains on the To Do list.  Michael Faughn has made great containment tool progress.  Smaller step to get the semantics readable.


:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
::  172 DEV Domain Implementation
::  None as of 9/30/2020
::- Close this and create an Action Item for PCD Coordination with the Tiger Team.  Let Todd know of any questions.  Report at next DEV meeting.
::  173 Update TF for DEV Domain
::- Close this and create an Action Item for PCD Coordination with the Tiger Team.  Let Todd know of any questions. Report at next DEV meeting.
 
: Further topics Todd)
 
:- Virtual Connectathons – Is the PC part of this discussion?  We haven’t discussed it.  Would be very challenging.  Gazelle is the easiest parts.  Theoretically could use a 4G router to divorce from corporate IT limitations.  Epic has a HIMSS system separate from their own regular systems.
 
:- How to officially add a sponsor to an existing Domain.  IHE has no process separate from Domain creation.  Domain management should have a way to vet sponsors.  Make this a Domain Action Item.
 
 


Adjourn PCD Planning Committee (PC)
: 10:30 - Adjourn Planning Committee meeting




Line 679: Line 734:
'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''


: Close existing PC Action items and roll them into a DEV Tiger Team Action Item
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads
: Create DEV Action Item on creating a process to add a sponsor to a Domain.




|}
|}


=== Thursday Joint PC&TC Meeting Summary ===
=== Wednesday Joint PCD PC&TC Meeting Summary ===




Line 721: Line 775:
|
|


:* '''IHE International Board - Update & Feedback''' (Todd)
:: Good handle on the programs.  Unsure is to know how IHE supports member organizations.
:: Membership – about 180, steady and growing a bit.  The paid membership seems to be working.
:: Funding – Down a bit.  Affects document staff.
:: Global ehealth Consortium – Started in January, expected announcement at HIMSS.  Goal is to clarify interoperability.  Still very early in the process.  Real world impact; For us, pretty clear, outside of IHE, still needs fleshing out.
:: Covid-19 – Have a page and press release stating what we’ve been doing.
:: Global support – WHO deployment, World summit, deployment committees
:: Testing and Tools – Connectathon, Connectathon seal, certification.  Also looks at tools, especially looking at virtualizing Connectathons and consistent testing.
::- Question – See these announcements, but customers may not see value.  It takes many years, and they don’t see the long view.  How do we keep them interested?  Trying to get the message out to those that decide to implement or purchase systems.
::- Membership Value/Challenges – Transitioned from Steve Moore for CN support to IHE Europe.  How to effectively manage virtualization.
::- Is the message getting out well enough?  Generally, so far.  Is the Product Registry valuable?  Somewhat, but not hugely.  Good to point to for reference,  But it’s not comprehensive and accurate.  Our Commercially Available list is more useful.  The Connectathon Results page helps.  Don’t know how to increase viability of the Registry.  Extensive discussion of how to make it more useful.  Where do customers come up with requirements?  Unsure.  Definite uptick in IHE requirements by customers.
(left 8:50 for IDCO help)
::- (back 9:07) Tiger Team  - Reviewed Domain Page, discussed framework and internal operations.  Other big pieces for our ‘top 10’ list. 


:* Review 2019 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
:: Ken – Seems compressed.  Discussed timelines, resolved concerns.


:* '''Five year plan'''
:* Five year plan  
:: No current plan
:: No current plan
::- [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE-PCD_Roadmap_F2F_2017-04-04.xls 2017 Roadmap]
::- [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE-PCD_Roadmap_F2F_2017-04-04.xls 2017 Roadmap]
::- and [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE_PCD_PlanNotes2011-11-16.doc 2011 Plan Notes]
::- and [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE_PCD_PlanNotes2011-11-16.doc 2011 Plan Notes]
 
::- Need to move links to Google Drive
:: Architecture – Revamp Vol 1 to reflect new structure of Devices.
::- Nothing past 2020/2021 cycleDoes it serve a purpose? Is this an IHE requirementCheck the IHE for Domain requirements. If not, we could eliminate it.  Also check with other programs to see if they want to continue with it.  It did serve a good purpose originally.  Can this be merged into other resources.  We have an updated document.  It is useful for showing plans to member organizations and sponsors.
:: DEC – Tested PCD-05 at 2020 CNAdd FHIR option (Todd).  
::- Add for ACM Rationalize 60601 rules, address nomenclature
:: ACM – add PCD-07 (Tom K).  Is PCD-06 affected at allAnyone remember the ePHI ? Smart Alarms – Leave for now, but is likely will be absorbed into Quiet Hospital.
::- Discuss at next PC meetings
:: Device Context Management PCIM will be addressed in Dpi
::- Paul will share the document with everyone.
:: Point of Care – Should this move into DPi?  Likely, will need to triage.
:: Quality – Will be a proposal coming soon from DPi White Paper this cycle.  SESMDI – Safe, Effective and Secure Medical Device Interoperability.
:: IEC 60601


:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
:: Close, refer to Tiger Team and start as a DEV Action Item.
:: The Showcase video and This is ‘IHE webinar’.  Todd may have a couple of DPI activities.  


:* '''Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2020 Fall F2F'''
:* Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F
:: Unlikely to get to a hospital by the next meeting.
:: Probably virtual, not the week of April 5.   Shoot for week of 26th.
:: Hotels may be desperate for our business.
:: May be able to adjust dates and length after this session.
:: Dates – Oct 6, Sept 29, Sept 16
:: HIMSS event Sept 16-19 in San Francisco. 
:: Could set up close to a provider at a hotel.
:: September may be challenging for international members.
::  Bring up with Tiger Team.
::  We have enough to start.


:* Do we continue this meeting?  Stop for next F2F meeting and review.


Joint PC&TC Meeting Adjourned
: 9:40  - Adjourn Joint DEV PCD PC&TC meeting.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
:: Close, refer to Tiger Team and start as a DEV Action Item.
:* Fall F2F
:: DEV decision refer to Tiger Team




Line 788: Line 810:
|}
|}


===  Thursday/Friday TC Meeting Summary ===
===  Thursday/Friday PCD TC Meeting Summary ===




Line 807: Line 829:
: Agenda approved   
: Agenda approved   


: [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]]
: '''Meeting concluded on Thursday'''
:  Announcements –
:- Decision Making meeting (TC Co-Chairs)


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
Line 819: Line 838:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
|
|
:-
 


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 832: Line 851:
|
|


PCD Program review:
:* DEV PCD Program review:
 
: ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
:- Many CPs last cycle and some term clarification for SDC/ACM
:- Three CPs in queue for this cycle, including one to support Quiet Hospital
:- Working with other Domains on some Quiet Hospital actions.
:- Pushed out – Add documentation for PCD-06 WCTP XML element.
:- Concerns about test consistency at Connectathons, esp with XML and WCTP.
:- Keep-alive – Applies to all Profiles, achieved via optional transactions.  Discussion over managing the noise level; creating a new transaction vs. leaving it.  The concern is adding ‘noise’ to the network.  Explained how the process works.
: MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
:- CMI did some ACK work, will incorporate. 
:- NEED non-PID/PV1 message templates.
: MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
:- Need additional PL data type clarifications.  Need some codes – pretty much done.  MDS and VMD also in Paul Schluter’s list.  Pretty much done, Paul will send list to Dalibor.
: DEC (John R)
:- Pretty mature, well used.  Can discuss MDC/VMD structure later.
: EC (John R)
:- Somewhat Proto-Profile, could address more than IPEC.  Alarm/Alert closely related.  Slides highlight this process and use.  Can build on mature work done for IPEC.  Discussed how to generalize.  There is an event professional group with useful information we could incorporate.  What’s a good path forward.  Unsure, but if we do, we need to be careful to use common processes.  Can be a form of clinical decision support.  The equipment is pretty sophisticated, it can do a lot of it, a challenge would be getting clinicians to support this vs. using what they have.  Is there a client for this? 
: IPEC (Al E, Tom)
:- In FT, depending on terms updates.
: PIV (Brian WAl E)
:- Progress on programming a bolus and syringe pumps.
: Pump (Al E, Jeff R.)
:-  Trying to get the new terms and visual representation of contianment model.  In a good spot to get things done before the next F2F
: DPI  (John R)
:- Brand new world.  Meetings going on for a long time.  Now have a new set of DPI and SDC standards, will hear a lot more.  Stay tuned at relevant meetings.
: Physio monitor (John R)
:- What to do with Volume 3 in Profiles.  It’s been dormant for a while.  Good time to look at Vol. 3 again and what we want it to do for us.  Basic maps are in there for basic models, could be a lot more.  A good item to discuss at the DEV Domain level.  What do implementers want?  Thoughts?  Can use Michael Faughn’s work to move forward (MS Word document not useful), let implementers to focus on what’s important to them, especially a computational document to build a model.  Michael is about to send out a document for this type of a model.  Is this Vol 3 only or does it affect the other volumes?  Vol 1 is very public facing, not detailed.  Vol 2 needs to be improved as a learning tool, grown a bit haphazardly, takes a lot of work to find specific content.  Instead of V 2a, 2b, 2c, have them separated into DPi, PCD and PCD.  Word can be used, with proper templates (legal uses them).  Would need instructions to do this.  A good item for the Tiger Team.
: PCIM (John R)
:- 80001 has some templates to manage the risk.  Have found we can’t rely on patient data admin packages.  Need human verification.  HL7 v2 isn’t great at patient queries.  Ready to be implemented, but there are very limited resources to do so.  FHIR may be better suited to this, we may want to move it there.  Are there any real customers for this yet?  VA is using Ioana’s work to manage implantables.  Not a lot of interest from CMI members yet, just higher priorities for now.
 
: Vent (Paul Schluter)
: IDCO (Paul Schluter)
: RTM (Paul Schluter)


:: ACM (Monroe P)
::-  Getting PCD-05 into HL7 2.8.2 conformance.  Need an MSA statement, will have a CP.  Next is a transaction resolution from the last CN.  Third CP address OBRs 3 and 29.  Want value into 29, except for 1st component.  Makes alert onset doesn’t need what’s in 29 or 3 – will resolve the conflict.  May also change some TF semantic change due to feedback.  Will discuss in workgroup – mostly to clarify for new participants.  Could add descriptions in the test case.  John G – context based can have a pre-existing data.  That can be built into NIST Tool let him or Nicholas know when they will discuss it in the ACM meeting.  They can adjust the tool to provide context.  If it feeds into OBR 3 and 29, they can check the content.  TCAMPT can let them constrain the test to comply.  Rob has samples to review at next meeting.  4PM Eastern next week.
:: MEM DMC and MEM LS (Monroe P)
::- Next release of 10101b includes some MEM nomenclature.  Both at TI status; until we get more participants to test, they aren’t comfortable sending to FT.  Been tested for more than three years, but will be at least 2022 to submit.  MEMDMC – do we have enough actors?  We need more consumers, have enough reporters; one more would be good, a CMMS would help a lot.  MEMLS has enough consumers, but not enough reporters, including different technologies. 
:: DEC, Physio monitor, PCIM and EC (John R)
::- Mostly covered at Planning meeting.  Fundamentally stable.  Have an action item to revisit DEC hierarchy and amplify it for new implementers, not very major
:: PIV (Kurt)
::- Not much new.  Some tweaking to get everything to match.  It’s pretty stable.  Working on PCA programming.  Will TF have changes – mostly to clarify values and intent, no process changes.
:: IPEC and Pump (Kurt)
::- Lot of term work.  Kurt displayed the spreadsheet they’ve worked on this cycle and highlighted the changes.  Brian added examples to the document.  Plan to wrap it up in the next two meetings and get it to Paul Schluter.  Paul Sc – lets him release the MEM terms as well.  Are the REFIDs finalized?  Pretty much, some are ‘temporary’, but once set to provisional and sent to Michael Faughn they will be permanent and inviolable.
:: Pump (Kurt)+


:- Standards Coordination, RTM and IEEE P11073-10101b draft standard (Paul Schluter)
:: DPI (Todd, Stefan)
:: Overview of where we are and process to begin “ballot group formation” for IEEE P11073-10101b
::- A lot going on and a lot still to be done.  Strategy of Germini has proven very helpful, helps keep both leaderships informed, Confluence enables that, plus IHE Webex and other tools help.  Key focus areas:  Getting supplement done, plugathon/connectathon work.  SDPi will be part of European Plugathon - will test remote testing.  Have SASMDI technical report underway, was slow because of time, should speed up soon.  Will be discussed in Europe nexr month.  Will work on Detailed Profile Proposal.  Is there a time limit?  Not really.
:: IEEE 11073 SC & PARs & EMBS SC (mobile, IoT, AI/ML)
::  
::- Very good progress on 10101bHave captured a lot of what implementers wantInfusion pumps was a big contributorPlan is to have rigorous models for everyone to build onExcellent progress with Dialysis terms as well.  New groups prefer tightly defined documents.  Could add a lot of bed terms if the vendors are interestedDialysis has asked for two items, he will drafted Cps to support itNeed to provided status updates, Monroe found a term to add for data loggingWant to add event codes in a PCD-01 message, mostly notifications (not alerts)Will send out a ballot review group this AugustIf you join, your input will matter a lot.   
:: Vent, IDCO, RTM, Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
::- IDCO making excellent progressThey hope for Jan 2020 NA CN, but definitely for the 2021 CN.
:-  Presentation provided. 
::- A lot of work is doneGetinge has new terms for vents but a lot of provisional codes assignedIt’s the last step before becoming a standard.  Other device categories not solid enough yet for provisional terms.  Pumps almost readyDialysis is pretty much done, has a call at 10AM to work on that.  Nurse call and Bed management – waiting for increased vendor participation.  Their participation will also help the MEM Profiles.  Monroe – don’t wait for Nurse call and Bed management slow the existing terms down.  ISO 19223 is standardizing vent mode, this can help standardize the user facing display.
::- Dialysis – they’ve struggled in the past using HL7.  Lately, they’ve revisited it in the last couple of years and have made great progress using IHE messaging.  Have a solid ‘’TF’’ assembled, which will be sent out for review by about 30 vendors and user companies.  It’s very solid.  Showed some examples and highlighted messages and strings.  Want to get the ISO 19223 string well defined.  Brings up some questions – some want 1-1 mapping both directionsSNOMED is working on terms as well.  John G – Have settings with these settings – would it always defined in RTMMS, or in implementation guides?  Generally in implementation guides.  Can be different validation levels, which will be testable by NIST.  Will each mde have specific rules stored as a Profile or device specialization.  Could be stored as a containment tree.  The standard will publish the the supported stringsAll IEEE values will be listed.  Paul displayed vent mode listand discussed it’s use.  Do these need to be translated into REFIDS?  Yes and it’s been doneThis could be useful for MEM as well, very useful for off-line analysisWanted to gather many readings and send together, rather than sending each as a seperate message.  Monroe pointed out a solution a few months ago, the BATCH messageThey are using it for Dialysis, could be used for many Profiles.  No need for any new actors.  Some discussion of solicited vs. unsolicited messagesDialysis really wants to use itIt won’t be used in a CN soon.  John G – If this is important add ‘should’ to the submission, it helps NIST justify the inclusion.


::- Should we have Technical Alert ‘severity’ codes? Some examples on the slideMonroe – not fan of ‘severity’
:: IDCO (Paul Schluter for Alexander Kraus)
::- Been doing a lot of work. Ready for major publication. They want to participate in the next NA CNThey’re ready to start testing.  Working on use cases.


:- Standards Coordination (Cont.)
::  Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
: : Dalibor - IEEE P1847 (RTLS) standard moving along, incorporated MEMLS info.
::- Have two CPs underway for new eventsOne can be in ACM. Some of their work is very similar to  
:: HL7
WCM annotationHave examples of the types of relevant eventsIncludes a ‘continue’ function, some wouldn’t arise to the level of an ACM event.
::- Canceled May meetings, working on virtual meetingsIEEE POC group may also meet virtually.
:: Devices on FHIR
::- Two successfully implemented guides, PHD and POC.  PHD is close to publicationMeet every week. Working to incorporate SDC into Point of Care documentation.  Adjusting POC Device to reflect tech advances.  Recognizing HL7/IHE skirmishes, the Gemini projects hope to address itTodd pitched Devices on FHIR and POC as a project, was well received.


:* PCD Program review (cont):
:: Tooling (Michael F)
::  Quiet Hospital   Note – Check recording until 8:13)
::- Presentation on Google drive.  RTMMS update - Why?  Looks good but messy underneath.  Showed how it will be. Will map terms and improve user interface, with a mechanism to introduce new terms.  Rosetta term profiles will be able to drive NIST test tooling.  Should help create conformant profiles.  Finished migrating and merging RTMMS V1 and 10101-2019 into V3.   Profiling tools have started working.  Described the reference site and demonstrated it.  Looking for feedback on how useful it is and how to make it more useful.  The public version has some issues, they will migrate it to a newer server with a newer Ubuntu version.  If you want to test V2, let him know and he'll give you access.  Containment Profiles: Brian Witkowski has done a lot of pump work.  Reviewed what they are.  It will be computable.  Using the term boosts inclusion in 10101.  provides high level/abstract device description and can drive the test tools.  Will ordering be in a published schema?  Generally, no - for example a monitor will send 200 readings, order isn't needed.  If order is needed, can use the Facet level, which resolves order-related issues.  Some discussion of how needed ordering is for different Domains and types of systems and that feasibility, especially regarding differing standards.  May need mapping to transform this into other Domains.  Versioning - How we version things is a bit tricky.  V2 Roadmap - Improve RTM tool and ref site interface, extensions for source/event pairs, RTMMMS web services and term management for SDO users.  John G Working on integrating the two profiling tools.  With these tools, it would help for each workgroup to have a super-user to go into IGAMPT and TGAMPT and review them for their use.  John:  Metric hanging off an MDS?  If omitted, we have a mechanism to insert them, very rigorous.  Need to get on workgroup calls to work this out.  What do we call a 'metric' when it's not really a metric?  Things aren't always clear, choose something and go ahead.


::- Tom … Logistics for demo is a bit challenging.  It’s VERY well staged with back story, etc.  Rob – it would be good to use this year’s use cases for next year’s HIMSS.


::  Quiet Hospital (Rob)
::- Pretty well covered.  If you’re an AR vendor and interested, watch the PCD-05 work being done


: TC Action item review
: PCD TC Action item review


:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]  
:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]  


:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
::- Not much of an update right nowTed Klein and John’s group hope to submit changes. Move to end of May
::- No update.  Move to February.
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
::- Containment modeling important, can resolve problems, especially during Connectathon.  Asking those that need terms to create containment models.  This limits the need for inspecting messages by hand, as computers are much better at it.  He, Michael, and Brian are working on consistent output data as well.  NIST is working with CDC on a similar issues regarding COVID-19 tracking.  Inconsistent data quality is an issue for them as well.  John G – Nicholas will have some info that will help later during F2F.  Move to next F2F.
::- Should be resolved with Pump group and work with Michael Faughn.  Move out to January call.
:: 201  Pump utilization publicizing
:: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing.  Pretty stagnant, close.
::- IEEE 1847 will help this effortDue to schedule conflict, Paul didn’t submit to MDExpo April.  Move to May TC.
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
::- Once triggers are officially committed by HL7, they can implement it.  Monroe isn’t sure should be actually owner of this.  John Rhoads talks to O&O a lot.  They have a lot to do with limited resources.  He will take ownership.  Move to next F2F.
::- In HL7 queue, move to February, after HL7 meeting.


:* 10:45 > Containment modeling  (Paul Schluter)
: IHE Board meeting summary (Todd) - Pretty stable financially, had a recent boost in revenueA lot of national/international engagement on testing with WHO, etcA lot of discussion on adding value to IHE IP and assetsHow to make that info solid and add value; went well until money came up.  One idea - a "Connectathon Seal" which seems to help in Japan.  Discussed Product Registry issues, it's a challenge to add to itThey discussed IHE certified Professional - Monroe looked at it, shallow knowledge of all domains, not much use to any customers.
:: Containment models play an essential role for our work, want to emulate physical devices as much as possibleModels device subsystems very well.  Not fully embraced for rigorous validation.  Need solid models.  PCD is a leader, but we still have a ways to go.
:: Key items needed for more rigorous message definition and validation, focusing on containment trees and essential next steps to improve IHE PCD DEC HL7 V2 message conformance testing.
::  He worked with a group that hadn’t heard of IHE, but are a good fit with what we do.   
::  The group worked on an easily shareable model (Engineers, clinicians, even marketing).  Though simple, it’s unambiguous.  Helps drive NIST test tools.  Showed and described containment model, the Dialysis group found it very usefulPaul reviewed how the Dialysis group used the model.  Messages are insensitive to sibling node order.  Order doesn’t matter, this helps speed up testingMany of the fields and models are used in other devices, which makes this process very portable.  Discussed event models they used, able to consider all events at the same time.  The group plans to adopt the HL7v2 ‘Batch’ term to consolidate all events in a sessionMany ways to ‘skin this cat’, this was one that worked very well. Want to adopt 1-2 models, make sure we don’t splinter our efforts.  Will delve into more issues, such as cardinality and containment.


Continued topic discussions
: F2F Action Review (from this week)


:: RTMMS update given by NIST contractor Michael Faughn
:- DEV - PCD Program
::- Building out Ver. 2.  Migrating existing terms into new framework, then other terms from Word docs into the framework.  Will then ask us to ‘test drive’ the new framework.  He demonstrated the framework, searching terms, units, etc.  Want feedback – what other things do we want out of the web application?  Please let him know.  Plan to build up to be more useful.  Will generalize Brian’s pump work for other devices.
:: If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F
::- Can you tag a metric in a search?  Yes, just not exposed right now.  Would take an hour or so if the tags are applied.
::- Hope to get to the Profiling tool by this fall.
::- One nice extension – show enumerated values and units.  It does that now, just not pretty right now.


::Conformance Tools/IGAMT (John G and Nicholas)
::- If Virtual
::- John showed their Resource Portal.  Wanted to show look and feel of tools.  IGAMT lets subject matter experts create the messages and Profiles.  IGAMT is at the forefront of this.  Nicholas has incorporated our Profiles into IGAMT.  Working on IGAMT2, has some power users, they’ll recruit some more soon (Al E?). 
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
::- Nicholas demonstrated IGAMT.  Not populated with PCD yet.  More powerful, should be tool used in the future.  If interested in being a beta user, let them know.  Suggest a lead from each working group.  Open registration right now.  It has most of the existing message structure.  Has built in structure for Implementation Guides.  HL7 is looking at adopting this and requiring their users to follow this process.  Can mix and match from different HL7v2 versions.  We will be able add some segments ourselves.  Now able to generate TF ready performance requirement documentation. 
::: Wed AM PC
::- There’s a lot more functionality, gives the SME a thorough toolbox.  Nicholas will create first version of our Profiles, we can then come in and modify as desired.  Can develop sophisticated test cases, even down to make and model to help with development.
::: Thurs AM TC
::- How do you overlay this onto a containment tree?  Can build it into the conformance rules. 
::: Friday AM Joint DEV


::- If Live
::: Tuesday Pump WG
::: Wed AM PC
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV


: F2F Action Review (from this week)
:: PC


:: '''PC'''
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads


: Close existing PC Action items and roll them into a DEV Tiger Team Action Item
: Five Year Plan - Do we still need it?  Review at next PC meeting.
: Create DEV Action Item on creating a process to add a sponsor to a Domain.


: Review live vs video demo for HIMSS Showcase.
::- Plan for video/virtual vs. plan for live or vice versa.  Tom will gather info from his team and send to  Todd to take to board.


:: '''PC&TC'''
: Next F2F -
::
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
:* Plan on virtual, hope for F2F
:: Close, refer to Tiger Team and start as a DEV Action Item.


:* Fall F2F
:: DEV decision refer to Tiger Team


 
:: TC
:: '''TC'''
::
::
::  No Follow-up action for TC, most relevant are at DEV level.
TC Meeting Wrap up and Adjournment (Kowalczyk)


TC Meeting Adjourned
: Monroe moved to close meeting, Christophe second


Closed at 1300 Thursday


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


|-


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''




Line 963: Line 948:
|}
|}


== Action Items - PC ==
== Action Items - PCD PC ==
The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.
The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.


:
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads
 
: Five Year Plan - Do we still need it?  Review at next PC meeting.
 
: Next F2F -
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
:*  Plan on virtual, hope for F2F


== Action Items - TC and WGs ==
== Action Items - PCD TC and WGs ==
The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.
The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.


== Next Meetings ==
== Next Meetings ==


Technical Committee: [[PCD TC 2020-05-06 Webex]]
DEV Domain Meeting: Oct 28, 2020 [[DEV Joint 2020-10-28 Webex]]


Planning Committee: [[PCD PC 2020-05-13 Webex]]
Technical Committee: Nov 4, 2020 [[PCD TC 2020-11-04 Webex]]


Joint Planning and Technical Committee: [[PCD PC&TC 2020-04-29 Webex]]
Planning Committee: Oct 13, 2020, [[PCD PC 2020-10-13 Webex]]


<!--
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:DEV Meeting Archive 2020]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive 2020]]

Latest revision as of 17:05, 18 October 2021

PCD Home


Paul Sherman, PCD TPM

Meeting Objectives

These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the committees involved:
  • DEV Domain level Discussions
  • DEV PCD Program Discussion
Planning Committee: Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
Technical Committee: Review and adopt brief profile proposals;Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.

Location & General Schedule

Location:
- Virtual via Webex (Info below)


Dates
- To assist European participants, all meetings will be morning meetings, with a meeting on Friday.
the times will be 9AM EDT - 1PM EDT
Monday : Pump Working Group
Tuesday : Joint DEV Domain meeting (PCD+DPi+PCH), PCD Planning Committee
Wednesday : PCD Planning and Technical Committees
Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee
Friday, : PCD Technical Committee
The schedule is proposed; actual meeting times may change during the week.
Daily Schedule - All times Eastern Daylight Time (US)
  • 09:00 - 11:00 Session #1
  • 11:15 - 13:00 Session #2

Agenda Suggestions

Please submit suggestions for agenda topics here or through emails to the committee co-chairs.

From the DEV PCD PC Action Items PCD Planning Committee Action Items:

No current open Action Items

From the DEV PCD TC Action Items: PCD Technical Committee Action Items:

196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
201 Pump utilization - publicizing
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional

Webex Support

Because of COVID-19, these meetings will be held via Webex. The links will are provided below.

Reminders: the IP agreement is in force, and participation counts toward voting rights.

Please note: the log in and phone number for each meeting is the same as for our WG meetings. The password is included in the email sent to participants. These are not provided here for security reasons (this is a public Wiki page).

The IHE Webex page is [IHE Webex]

DEV PCD Meetings
- Monday, October 5: DEV PCD Pump WG: Meeting Number: 145 575 8268
- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint, followed by DEV PCD PC: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
- Wednesday Oct 7: Joint DEV PCD PC&TC and TC: Meeting Number: 145 257 7058
- Thursday Oct 8: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number: 145 546 3377
- Friday, Oct 9: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number: 145 767 6035
PCH Meetings:
- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
DPi Meetings:
- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641

Updated 8/10/2020 PRS

Attachments / Materials

Documents related to the meeting when available will be found at the [Devices Google Drive] unless otherwise noted. Documents are available without a password.

Schedule/Deadlines: Patient Care Device and Domain Milestones

PCD PC Action Items PCD Planning Committee Action Items. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

PCD TC Action Items PCD Technical Committee Action Items. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Detailed Schedule & Agenda

Monday, October 5 (PCD Pump Workgroup)

Date Hours Committees Topics


Monday 09:00 - 1:00 PCD Pump workgroup
  • Morning (09:00-1:00)
  • 9:15
Pump Terms containment model update - 1.5hr
Are all terms correct and unambiguous?
Identify any missing comments/descriptions for terms.
Identify any deprecated/withdrawn terms.
Decision on readiness of terms for IEEE 10101b
  • Break (10:45-11:00)
PCD-10 question
  • 1:00 > Meeting Adjournment

Tuesday Oct 6, 2020

Date Hours Committees Topics


Tuesday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:00 Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting
  • 09:00 > IHE IP Management Process (Kurt)
  • 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
  • 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
  • 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
09:30 PCD
09:50 PCH
10:10 DPI
  • IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
  • Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [1]
  • Domain Discussions
Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.) (Paul Sherman)


Break 11:00 - 11:15 AM
Tuesday Pt. 2 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting Continued
  • 11:15 >
New Proposals
- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
PCH- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [2]
DEV PC Action Items: DEV PC Action Items
- 002 Board Review
- 003 Wiki Web Updates
- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot
Ballot currently open - results or finish vote (Michael)
Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
- If Virtual
Tuesday AM Pump WG
Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
Thurs AM TC
Friday AM Joint DEV
- If Live
Tuesday Pump WG
Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
Thurs PM Joint DEV
  • 12:45 > Next steps and wrap up
  • 13:00 > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting

updated 10/02/2020

Wednesday Oct 7, 2020

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Wednesday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:15 AM
  • 09:00 > Joint DEV PCD PC/TC meeting
  • Introduction
- IHE IP Management Process (5 minutes)(Kurt)
- Review & Approve Joint PC&TC Agenda (Kurt)
  • Five year plan
No current plan
- 2017 Roadmap
- and 2011 Plan Notes
  • Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
  • Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F
  • Continue Joint PC/TC F2f meeting?
Adjourn Joint DEV PCD PC&TC meeting.
Break 11:15 - 11:30 AM
Thursday Pt. 2 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
11:30 > Start DEV PCD PC meeting
  • Introduction
- IHE IP Management Process (5 minutes)(Kurt)
- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
- ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
- MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
- MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
- WCM (Paul Schluter)
- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
- RTM (Paul Schluter)
- Vent (Paul Schluter)
- PIV (Kurt)
- IPEC (Kurt)
- Pump (Kurt)
- PCIM (John R)
- Physio monitor (John R)
- DEC
  • General update PCD TF) (John R)
  • DEC OPTION: FHIR (Todd C)
- EC (John R)
- DCM Pulse Oximetry
Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
- Review current Action Item: PCD Planning Committee Action Items:
None as of 9/30/2020
Adjourn Planning Committee meeting

Updated 10/02/2020 PRS

Thursday Oct 8, 2020

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Thursday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:00 AM
  • 09:00 > COpen DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
TC Welcome and Agenda Review (Tom Kowalczyk)
Announcement – Decision Making meeting (TC Co-Chairs)
  • DEV PCD Program review:
ACM (Monroe P)
MEM DMC (Monroe P)
MEM LS (Monroe P)
DEC (John R)
EC (John R)
PIV (Kurt)
IPEC (Kurt)
Pump (Kurt)
DPI (John R)
Physio monitor (John R)
PCIM (John R)
Vent (Paul Schluter)
IDCO (Alexander Kraus)
RTM (Paul Schluter)
Quiet Hospital
Break 11:00 - 11:15 AM
Thursday, Pt. 2 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
  • 11:15 > Continued topic discussions
PCD TC Action item review
196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
201 Pump utilization - publicizing
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional

Friday, Oct 9, 2020

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Friday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:00 AM
  • 09:00 > Additional Topics
Break 11:00 - 11:15 AM
Friday, Pt. 2 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
  • 11:15 > Continued topic discussions


F2F Action Review (from this week)
- DEV - PCD Program
If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F
- If Virtual
Tuesday AM Pump WG
Wed AM PC
Thurs AM TC
Friday AM Joint DEV
- If Live
Tuesday Pump WG
Wed AM PC
Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
Thurs PM Joint DEV
PC
New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads
Five Year Plan - Do we still need it? Review at next PC meeting.
Next F2F -
  • Week of April 26, 2021
  • Plan on virtual, hope for F2F


TC


  • > TC Meeting Wrap up and Adjournment (Fournier)


Note: Time slot TBD: IDCO

Participants

Monday Oct 5

Chair: Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
Participants: Al Engelbert (BBraun), Ali Nakoulima (Cerner), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Christophe Fournier (Fresenius), Jeff Rinda (Interoperability Solutions), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Paul Schluter (CMI), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun)

Tuesday, Oct 6

Chair: Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
Participants: Jacob Anderson, Todd Cooper, Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Thom Erickson, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Timon Grob, Jorn, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Koichiro Matsumoto, Eric Moll, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Martin Rosner, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski

Wednesday, Oct 7

Chair: Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
Participants: Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski

Thursday, Oct 8

Chair:
Participants:

Friday, Oct 9

Chair:
Participants:

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Monday Pump WG Meeting

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Reviewed IHE IP Management Process

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Pump Terms containment model update
Status/Discussion:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rN5x8Uhlj6s8qIoExzaS1EyfrpgfvCZt/edit
Comments added to Review Comments tab in spreadsheet
Identified some missing terms/descriptions.
Deprecated/to be withdrawn terms have been removed from Model already, Brian has a list that has been added to spreadsheet as new tab
Deprecated terms needs to be reviewed by everyone, need to add replacement terms for each deprecated term.
Decision on readiness of terms for IEEE 10101b - getting closer, still need to finish a few updates based on questions/comments.


3 PCD-10 question Flush event
Status/Discussion:
PCD-10 question on Flush event, MDC_EVT_STAT_LINE_FLUSH.
IPEC has very specific events defined, this could be a PCD-01 event but would not be a PCD-10 event.


5 Next meeting
Status/Discussion:
Decided to hold next pump WG meeting on Oct 26th, will cancel Oct 12th.
Brian working on FHIR based approach to programming pumps - will add to agenda for discussion on the 26th
Christophe will prepare some examples of messages using the Model for review on the 26th.
Pump WG F2F meeting adjourned at 10:30


Action(s): See above

Tuesday DEV Domain Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
Introductions and Agenda Review

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:


3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:


  • 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
  • Program Reports
PCD
- Quiet Hospital (Rob)
Constant progress, discussing some changes, esp with ACM. Some changes underway. Lot of Definition progress. Word is getting out very well via a HIMSS video. Pla to have presentations witrh SDPi and ACM included at the HIMSS Showcase.
- Pumps (Brian)
Terminology updating underway. Formalizing new termss and cleaning up existing terms. New spreadsheet with containment model hierarchy. Michael Faughn asking a lot of good questions. Hope to get it out for review and then inclusion in 10101b.
PCH (Thom)
- Slide deck on Google Drive.
- Promotional Activities – Blog series came out. Participated in FHIR Dev Days, will join the November session as well. IHE Webinar, video on Youtube. Participated in HIMSS Europe 2020.
- Preparing Program Value proposition for customers.
- Working with IEEE-PHD to simplify the information model. Working on 2nd draft – will have BT info to develop a generic sensor profile. Close to BARB (Bluetooth Architecture Review Board) review.
- D2C constrained Implementation (Brief Proposal prepared to vote on today)
- Mobile Health Apps – styill in queue
- Test and Tools – Gazelles, POU Profiles and Remote Testing capabilities.
- Project Gemini Participation – Info in slides.
- PCHA Code report – Goal to connect any medical devices to any EMR.
- Surveyed builders – Got to 300-400 people, will wrap up in a couple of weeks.
10:10 DPI (Ken)
- Had about 2-3 meetings focused on Brief Profile Proposal. Still getting organized and moving forward.
  • Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [3]
2020 – TF in final stages, will be published soon
2021 – Looking format similar to ITI, rather than hard dates, would make us more nimble. Monroe – need to check with Mary on how it will affect her workload. DEV Cochairs will take this forward as an ‘’’Action Item’’’
  • Domain Discussions
Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.) (Paul Sherman)
- Thom – Do things at the program level as much as possible. Rob – CPs at program level, but communicate at Domain level. Quiet Hospital is a good example PCD work that affects DPi is a good example. Unless it’s at the governance level, we may not need Domain action. Rob will assemble some notes for review at DEV Cochairs ’’’Action Item’’’
New Proposals
- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA) (Todd)
Been circulated within Dpi and DEV for review. A 10 year journey to get here.
How to leverage existing standards to create a DEV Porofile (Add transactions and Actors). MDIRA leverages existing ICE work.
Talk about data logger – how will we get the data out of the logger? No guidance on that yet. Dialysis is using the HL7 v2 ‘Batch’ function – it works very well. There is a lot of work available that can help.
Are there actual devices that are using or planning on using this? Yes, it’s a DoD funded project; there is a pump and couple of monitors that are using it. 2-3 pump companies are preparing to implement it. The plan is to have it open source. Big question – is this addressing problems already solved? It is focused on solutions that provide value.
Todd displayed MDIRA website and link. Discussed process, monetization and open source nature of the product.
Motion proposed (Christophe), Second (Rob) – approved.
- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [4] (Thom and Michael)
Figure out to have a small device send info in a low coverage area without the battery running down fast. Touches on a number of standards for leverage.
Proposal voted on and approved.
Discussion of process for detailed proposal. Can be close to TI or just a bit more detailed. Other members will help with that work.
- Motions will be posted on the meeting folder and the current cycle folder.
DEV PC Action Items: DEV PC Action Items
- 002 Board Review
- 003 Wiki Web Updates
Todd has some more to do yet, re-open and set to Oct 27
- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot.
Closed, slate approved
Paul and Michael will formalize IHE notification.
Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
- Propose April for meeting month. Not week of
- Discussion regarding virtual vs. F2F, a lot depends on HIMSS support commitment. Concerns about HIMSS support coordination.
- Will
- If Virtual
Monday Pump WG
Tues PCD PC
Wed Joint PC/TC and TC
Thurs TC
Friday Joint DEV
- If Live
Tuesday Pump WG
Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
Thurs PM Joint DEV
Discussion of HIMSS conference and Use Case presentations.
- Rob discussed their recent experience with the virtual showcase. Discussion on process and plans for the August HIMSS conference Showcase.
  • IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
- January – update on Global Consortium at ONC conference. HL7, HIMSS, PCH Alliance and IHE pledge to cooperate. Consortium formed and will start to leverage strength. May hear some noise about IHE and FHIR ‘taking over the world’; not the case, taking advantage our work and support it. Work and coordination, specs, testing happens in IHE (Gemini Project), Consortium is interested in promoting and encouraging work forward and creating publicity and awareness. Is it all about FHIR? There was a lot of discussion. HL7 is highly focused on FHIR, though most work is in V2.
- Membership is strong, a lot due to DEV.
- IHE Europe Connectathon is virtualized (early November) Cost is about the same due to platform work. Plugathon coming up as well. Plan to leverage this work for the NA Connectathon. NA Connectathon is rescheduled for March now. Showcase will be part of August HIMSS conference.

Any details on when we’ll get info on the NA Connectathon? Likely nothing until after the European Connectathon.

- Discussion of Showcase presentations and virtual vs. live. Cost estimates? Tom: Took 5 months to prep, physical device expenses, software costs were minimal. May be an advantage to prep for virtual; live conversion costs wouldn’t be overwhelming. Getinge sponsored a lot of the work, so those expenses were minimized. More support from HIMSS would help this a lot. It’s easier to pivot from virtual to F2F vs. the other direction. Do we, or can we assemble a ‘lesson learned’ document to take back to IHE and HIMSS – Tom and Todd will work on it. ‘’’DEV Action Item’’’ Review at DEV Leadership call Oct 27.
- Role of IHE with other orgs – Making slow but consistent progress. Seems to be at a good pace. Project Gemini components are easier to understand than prior efforts. Confluence helps, Rob recommends we adopt it. ONC funded project to get IHE published same level as HL7, making progress, though still heavily FHIR focused.
  • Github discussion: Make sure which CPs need integrated to Github. John R – Cps
Draft 2020 TF prep. Make a DEV Committee ‘’’Action Item’’’, due Oct 28.
  • Next steps and wrap up
Milestone process review
Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
Github update
  • > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting

Decisions/Issues:

New Proposals
  • DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
Approved
  • PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [5]
Approved

Action(s):

Milestone process review
Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
Github update


Wednesday DEV PCD PC Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
Introductions and Agenda Review

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Minutes approved

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:
General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
- ACM (Rob W and Monroe P)
Rather quiet, most work associated with Quiet Hospital. Reviewing a couple of Cps, another may be created. One is addressing some PCD-05 updates. Likely 3 Cps before CN, focus on PCD-05 content; CN testing showed some enhancements were needed. Found some HL7 non-compliance. NIST tool looks for some content and format, but not specific content. Market penetration is increasing, some Non IHE vendors asked Rob if SPOK was compliant.
- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TI. Getting some interest in this profile.
- MEM LS (Monroe P)
No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TI. IEEE still planning to use HL7 for upper communication layer. IEEE wants to know who to contact for agreeing to them using it. Todd may be a good source to check. Dalibor will check with him. John R. - There may be a copyright acknowledgement needed, check with Todd or Mary Jungers.
- WCM (Paul Schluter)
Nothing major.
- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
Very good progress. Close to drafting text. Many hope to attend NA Connectathon.
- RTM (Paul Schluter)
Very good pump term progress, due to Brians updates. Once finalized can add codes to them and MEMDMC terms. Dialysis is in very good shape, a full profile. Includes TF and master spreadsheet with all needed terms, trees, models, etc. Includes six major vendors. Once pumps and dialysis done, can have a balloit.
- Vent (Paul Schluter)
Working with Getinge on their products. Also working on vent modes, can include ISO 223 mode strings.
- PIV (Kurt)
No major changes this cycle. CP to clean up some terms
- IPEC (Kurt)
FT, no changes
- Pump (Kurt)
Finalizing terms, pretty stable otherwise.
- PCIM (John R)
Dormant for a while, but coming back to life. A couple of vendors are interested. Some of the original members have moved on, hope some new staff there may be interested. Unlike other work, very like FHIR work, so may be a better fit. V2 query handling is ugly, FHIR handles them much better.
- Physio monitor (John R)
VERY stable – solid foundation laid 2004-006. Very good fit, haven’t needed to modify it much. Could work on V3 for data management. Some FHIR work; won’t replace V2, but once data is in the ecosystem, FHIR can help enable distribution.
- DEC
General update PCD TF) (John R)
- Some
DEC OPTION: FHIR (Todd C)
- Bridging HL7 to IHE. Lot of work by Moerkhe and others to provide FHIR equivalence.
- EC (John R)
Event Communication – Generalized framework for dealing with events. Much of it is addressed in other Profiles, especially ACM. Generalized for none Alert info, can use ACM infrastructure. IPEC is specialized EC, prototype for EC. MEMDMC provides device focused events. We are good at consistent implementation in those Profiles, this is available for other use. Tom – Is there a need for generic EC? Can John’s comments be put in V2 to address it? A White Paper would have limited exposure. Paul Sc - 10101B nails it an intermediate level. John will draft it as an addition to the TF and send out for review and input. new Action Item
- DCM Pulse Oximetry
Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT. PCD determined that originator prepares FT. It’s tested, so ready, but the creators haven’t been interested doing the work so far. John will help as bandwidth allows, which it hasn’t. Others are welcome to help as well. Remains on the To Do list. Michael Faughn has made great containment tool progress. Smaller step to get the semantics readable.
- Review current Action Item: PCD Planning Committee Action Items:
None as of 9/30/2020
10:30 - Adjourn Planning Committee meeting


Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):

New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads


Wednesday Joint PCD PC&TC Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
IHE IP Management Process

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
-

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:


  • Five year plan
No current plan
- 2017 Roadmap
- and 2011 Plan Notes
- Need to move links to Google Drive
- Nothing past 2020/2021 cycle. Does it serve a purpose? Is this an IHE requirement? Check the IHE for Domain requirements. If not, we could eliminate it. Also check with other programs to see if they want to continue with it. It did serve a good purpose originally. Can this be merged into other resources. We have an updated document. It is useful for showing plans to member organizations and sponsors.
- Add for ACM – Rationalize 60601 rules, address nomenclature
- Discuss at next PC meetings
- Paul will share the document with everyone.
  • Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
The Showcase video and This is ‘IHE webinar’. Todd may have a couple of DPI activities.
  • Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F
Probably virtual, not the week of April 5. Shoot for week of 26th.
May be able to adjust dates and length after this session.
  • Do we continue this meeting? Stop for next F2F meeting and review.
9:40 - Adjourn Joint DEV PCD PC&TC meeting.

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):


Thursday/Friday PCD TC Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved
Meeting concluded on Thursday

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:
  • DEV PCD Program review:
ACM (Monroe P)
- Getting PCD-05 into HL7 2.8.2 conformance. Need an MSA statement, will have a CP. Next is a transaction resolution from the last CN. Third CP address OBRs 3 and 29. Want value into 29, except for 1st component. Makes alert onset doesn’t need what’s in 29 or 3 – will resolve the conflict. May also change some TF semantic change due to feedback. Will discuss in workgroup – mostly to clarify for new participants. Could add descriptions in the test case. John G – context based can have a pre-existing data. That can be built into NIST Tool let him or Nicholas know when they will discuss it in the ACM meeting. They can adjust the tool to provide context. If it feeds into OBR 3 and 29, they can check the content. TCAMPT can let them constrain the test to comply. Rob has samples to review at next meeting. 4PM Eastern next week.
MEM DMC and MEM LS (Monroe P)
- Next release of 10101b includes some MEM nomenclature. Both at TI status; until we get more participants to test, they aren’t comfortable sending to FT. Been tested for more than three years, but will be at least 2022 to submit. MEMDMC – do we have enough actors? We need more consumers, have enough reporters; one more would be good, a CMMS would help a lot. MEMLS has enough consumers, but not enough reporters, including different technologies.
DEC, Physio monitor, PCIM and EC (John R)
- Mostly covered at Planning meeting. Fundamentally stable. Have an action item to revisit DEC hierarchy and amplify it for new implementers, not very major
PIV (Kurt)
- Not much new. Some tweaking to get everything to match. It’s pretty stable. Working on PCA programming. Will TF have changes – mostly to clarify values and intent, no process changes.
IPEC and Pump (Kurt)
- Lot of term work. Kurt displayed the spreadsheet they’ve worked on this cycle and highlighted the changes. Brian added examples to the document. Plan to wrap it up in the next two meetings and get it to Paul Schluter. Paul Sc – lets him release the MEM terms as well. Are the REFIDs finalized? Pretty much, some are ‘temporary’, but once set to provisional and sent to Michael Faughn they will be permanent and inviolable.
Pump (Kurt)+
DPI (Todd, Stefan)
- A lot going on and a lot still to be done. Strategy of Germini has proven very helpful, helps keep both leaderships informed, Confluence enables that, plus IHE Webex and other tools help. Key focus areas: Getting supplement done, plugathon/connectathon work. SDPi will be part of European Plugathon - will test remote testing. Have SASMDI technical report underway, was slow because of time, should speed up soon. Will be discussed in Europe nexr month. Will work on Detailed Profile Proposal. Is there a time limit? Not really.
Vent, IDCO, RTM, Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
- Presentation provided.
- A lot of work is done. Getinge has new terms for vents but a lot of provisional codes assigned. It’s the last step before becoming a standard. Other device categories not solid enough yet for provisional terms. Pumps almost ready. Dialysis is pretty much done, has a call at 10AM to work on that. Nurse call and Bed management – waiting for increased vendor participation. Their participation will also help the MEM Profiles. Monroe – don’t wait for Nurse call and Bed management slow the existing terms down. ISO 19223 is standardizing vent mode, this can help standardize the user facing display.
- Dialysis – they’ve struggled in the past using HL7. Lately, they’ve revisited it in the last couple of years and have made great progress using IHE messaging. Have a solid ‘’TF’’ assembled, which will be sent out for review by about 30 vendors and user companies. It’s very solid. Showed some examples and highlighted messages and strings. Want to get the ISO 19223 string well defined. Brings up some questions – some want 1-1 mapping both directions. SNOMED is working on terms as well. John G – Have settings with these settings – would it always defined in RTMMS, or in implementation guides? Generally in implementation guides. Can be different validation levels, which will be testable by NIST. Will each mde have specific rules stored as a Profile or device specialization. Could be stored as a containment tree. The standard will publish the the supported strings. All IEEE values will be listed. Paul displayed vent mode listand discussed it’s use. Do these need to be translated into REFIDS? Yes and it’s been done. This could be useful for MEM as well, very useful for off-line analysis. Wanted to gather many readings and send together, rather than sending each as a seperate message. Monroe pointed out a solution a few months ago, the BATCH message. They are using it for Dialysis, could be used for many Profiles. No need for any new actors. Some discussion of solicited vs. unsolicited messages. Dialysis really wants to use it. It won’t be used in a CN soon. John G – If this is important add ‘should’ to the submission, it helps NIST justify the inclusion.
IDCO (Paul Schluter for Alexander Kraus)
- Been doing a lot of work. Ready for major publication. They want to participate in the next NA CN. They’re ready to start testing. Working on use cases.
Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
- Have two CPs underway for new events. One can be in ACM. Some of their work is very similar to

WCM annotation. Have examples of the types of relevant events. Includes a ‘continue’ function, some wouldn’t arise to the level of an ACM event.

Tooling (Michael F)
- Presentation on Google drive. RTMMS update - Why? Looks good but messy underneath. Showed how it will be. Will map terms and improve user interface, with a mechanism to introduce new terms. Rosetta term profiles will be able to drive NIST test tooling. Should help create conformant profiles. Finished migrating and merging RTMMS V1 and 10101-2019 into V3. Profiling tools have started working. Described the reference site and demonstrated it. Looking for feedback on how useful it is and how to make it more useful. The public version has some issues, they will migrate it to a newer server with a newer Ubuntu version. If you want to test V2, let him know and he'll give you access. Containment Profiles: Brian Witkowski has done a lot of pump work. Reviewed what they are. It will be computable. Using the term boosts inclusion in 10101. provides high level/abstract device description and can drive the test tools. Will ordering be in a published schema? Generally, no - for example a monitor will send 200 readings, order isn't needed. If order is needed, can use the Facet level, which resolves order-related issues. Some discussion of how needed ordering is for different Domains and types of systems and that feasibility, especially regarding differing standards. May need mapping to transform this into other Domains. Versioning - How we version things is a bit tricky. V2 Roadmap - Improve RTM tool and ref site interface, extensions for source/event pairs, RTMMMS web services and term management for SDO users. John G Working on integrating the two profiling tools. With these tools, it would help for each workgroup to have a super-user to go into IGAMPT and TGAMPT and review them for their use. John: Metric hanging off an MDS? If omitted, we have a mechanism to insert them, very rigorous. Need to get on workgroup calls to work this out. What do we call a 'metric' when it's not really a metric? Things aren't always clear, choose something and go ahead.


Quiet Hospital (Rob)
- Pretty well covered. If you’re an AR vendor and interested, watch the PCD-05 work being done
PCD TC Action item review
196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
- No update. Move to February.
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
- Should be resolved with Pump group and work with Michael Faughn. Move out to January call.
201 Pump utilization - publicizing. Pretty stagnant, close.
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
- In HL7 queue, move to February, after HL7 meeting.
IHE Board meeting summary (Todd) - Pretty stable financially, had a recent boost in revenue. A lot of national/international engagement on testing with WHO, etc. A lot of discussion on adding value to IHE IP and assets. How to make that info solid and add value; went well until money came up. One idea - a "Connectathon Seal" which seems to help in Japan. Discussed Product Registry issues, it's a challenge to add to it. They discussed IHE certified Professional - Monroe looked at it, shallow knowledge of all domains, not much use to any customers.
F2F Action Review (from this week)
- DEV - PCD Program
If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F
- If Virtual
Tuesday AM Pump WG
Wed AM PC
Thurs AM TC
Friday AM Joint DEV
- If Live
Tuesday Pump WG
Wed AM PC
Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
Thurs PM Joint DEV
PC
New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads
Five Year Plan - Do we still need it? Review at next PC meeting.
Review live vs video demo for HIMSS Showcase.
- Plan for video/virtual vs. plan for live or vice versa. Tom will gather info from his team and send to Todd to take to board.
Next F2F -
  • Week of April 26, 2021
  • Plan on virtual, hope for F2F


TC
Monroe moved to close meeting, Christophe second

Closed at 1300 Thursday

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):


Action Items - PCD PC

The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.

New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads
Five Year Plan - Do we still need it? Review at next PC meeting.
Next F2F -
  • Week of April 26, 2021
  • Plan on virtual, hope for F2F

Action Items - PCD TC and WGs

The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.

Next Meetings

DEV Domain Meeting: Oct 28, 2020 DEV Joint 2020-10-28 Webex

Technical Committee: Nov 4, 2020 PCD TC 2020-11-04 Webex

Planning Committee: Oct 13, 2020, PCD PC 2020-10-13 Webex

PCD Home