Difference between revisions of "PCD TC 2009-08-12 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Discussion: clean up)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
== Proposed Agenda ==  
 
== Proposed Agenda ==  
−
'''Placeholder with very preliminary agenda copied from a June meeting'''
+
'''Preliminary agenda'''
  
 
'''Please add your suggestions'''
 
'''Please add your suggestions'''
−
:1. Agenda Approval
+
:1. Agenda Approval
−
:2. Review Discussion Summary:  July 15 meeting [[PCD TC 2009-07-15 Webex]]
+
:2. Review Discussion Summary:  August 5 meeting [[PCD TC 2009-08-05 Webex]]
−
:3. Action Item Review  
+
:3. Review existing ballots and need for additional votes
−
:4. Additional Business
+
:4.  RTM CPs: Review and approve ballot for approval.
−
:5. Next Meeting
+
:5.  Approve MEM - Medical Equipment Management White Paper for release to ballot
 +
:6.  PCD Major Issue Review / Discussion
 +
:7.  Web vs ftp vs Wiki: The question of usage
 +
:8.  World of Health IT Barcelona March 15-18, 2010 http://www.worldofhealthit.org/index.asp
 +
:9.  Action Item Review  
 +
:10. Additional Business
 +
:11. Next Meeting
  
 
== Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
 
== Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
  
−
'''Action items updated with July 29 - discussion was deferred on July 15, and most were deferred on July 29'''
+
See [[PCD Technical Committee Action Items]] page.
−
 
 
−
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
 
  
 
Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
 
Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
  
−
:{|border="2"
+
== Participants ==
−
|-
 
−
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
 
−
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
 
−
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
 
−
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
 
−
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
 
−
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
 
−
!              align="left"  |Comments
 
  
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 60
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' |Update TF
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd, Ken
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.
 
−
Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A Google Group has been established. Distribute the updated TF for use in this cycle’s implementation for the Connectathon. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF. TC to set the date for the TF public comment release. John Rhoads suggested members review and comment on the TF. He suggested emailing Todd with copies to Ken and himself. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. '''CPs will continue to be received as we go forward to the Connectathon. A number have been received. Paul noted that coordination with Continua will result in additional items. Todd requested that CPs be submitted now as the TF is reviewed. CPs addressing a WG profile will first be reviewed by the WG and then be brought to the TC.'''
 
  
−
|-
+
:'''Chair:'''  Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)
−
| align="center" | 62
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' |Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible?
 
−
| '''<Owner>:''' |Todd
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | Co-chairs
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Please see summary of June 3 for history http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_TC_2009-06-03_Webex#Discussion. John Rhoads reviewed the topic as discussed at the DCC. Ken and Todd took this to the DCC approximately 6 months ago. The DCC suggested PCD take the lead and coordinate the various IHE Domain. John indicated this was the same approach the DCC took again recently. Todd noted that Khalid is developing an approach for DPI and asked that John take this back to the DCC and he agreed to do so. Paul asked if bar codes (which are available in different standards) are the only identifier of interest. Others could include the patient’s photo. Todd suggested the PC draft a brief profile proposal that could be used to recruit ITI, Radiology and possibly PCC to join the effort. John asked Khalid if he would lead this effort and Khalid agreed to give this some thought. Paul noted that PCD-01 permits multiple patient identifiers. Change date to July 1.
 
  
−
|-
+
: Rita Brahmbatt, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Rich Hillman, Yarisa Jaroch, Brad Lunde, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, Yaikhomba Rajkumar,  John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Ioana Singureanu, Greg Staudenmaier, Manny Furst
−
| align="center" | 66
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Prepare profiles for registration.
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.15
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. John Garguilo believes two of the three profiles are now complete and correct in the MWB. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Connectathons/Yr3-2009/Yr3-PreConnectathonTesting/ PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site]. John Rhoads requested that this be addressed early in the cycle. Manny to request members post sample messages for past and future work and note any issues that need to be fixed. NIST is developing test scenarios, requiring the profile and constraints. The PIV WG is the initial profile. John reminded the group that MWB files are needed and should be posted to the ftp site.
 
  
−
|-
+
== Discussion ==
−
| align="center" | 77
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Preparing a Proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG (new name)
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Gary Meyer
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | Jeff Rinda, Al Engelbert 
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. '''Gary is monitoring the Pharmacy WG. They are focused on community practice. Gary suggested that about a third of this work will be useful for institutional practice. Ruth noted that HITSP is working on the ordering process. NCPCP is working on an HL7 2.5 messaging process. This work is US focused and may become an issue internationally. ''' They may not be interested in addressing this in this cycle (Atlanta the week of Sept. 21).
 
  
−
|-
+
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
−
| align="center" | 79
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Change Proposal Tutorial
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Provide a tutorial on filing Change Proposals. These have been suggested and need CPs: ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; Infusion Pump: clarify coding. John Rhoads / Todd Cooper to contact those developing CPs to ensure the process is understood and properly managed.
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 82
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | OID for PCD
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd, John Rhoads
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | 
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Manny to follow up on obtaining and OID.  Todd put up a Wiki page to describe managing the OID. John Rhoads will flesh that out. Change date to next meeting. '''John will report on current OID management discussions within the IHE DCC and update the IHE PCD OID page accordingly. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. This is very positive re. having a coordinated mangagement process and method (e.g., repository) in the near future.
 
−
'''
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 83
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | MOUs
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Sandy
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. It is on the ASTM executive meeting agenda next week. Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. The outcome has not been reported. '''Ken will follow-up with Julian Goldman to determine the current status.'''
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 84
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Patient Identity and PCD Messages
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd, Khalid, Gary
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | How best to accomplish this tie will be addressed in the white paper for further development as a supplement to PIB (Todd). Coordination with IEEE (-20103 CCOM) and ICE-PAC will be accomplished Jan. Draft a patient association brief profile proposal (Khalid). The A04 registration message is not the commonly used message, while A01 is used by hospitals at admission (Gary). Gary will review this issue and it will be factored into the CPs for publication and testing in the 2010 Connectathon. Also see 62. '''Note related discussions in the Infusion Pump WG.'''
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 86
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Test Tools
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo, Rob Snellick
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' | Manny
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.15
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | NIST will explore a registry for MWB files (Rob). Manny to request PCD Connectathon WG to post MWB files. Change date to June 17, add John Garguilo to the effort. '''NIST is open to providing incremental releases of "test artifacts" (which include MWB profiles).  Need to determine when such information is desired to be available for viewing/browsing. This information would be part of the Testing Infrastructure as part of a public repository. Can we establish a date to make this available by? Members were asked to send Garguilo any MWB files that should be considered when developing registered profiles. '''
 
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 87
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | IDCO
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Nick
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''For history see earlier meetings. Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). This will be done now. They will also review the comment regarding clarification of the translator’s role, and may remove it from discussion. With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future. ''' 
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 88
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Cycle 4 Supplement Status
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Ken, Todd
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | John Rhoads, Monroe, Paul offered to review the WCM document. Cycle 4 Supplement Status - Anticipated release dates are: IDCO - June 1; PIV - June 1; RTM - June 1; WCM - September 1. White Papers: DPI and MEM will be available this summer. PIV: Recent WG F2F: Todd briefly summarized the meeting. Those interested are referred to the Wiki page (see agenda list above). He noted it was a very productive meeting. RTM update: Paul found 40 errors and as a result is looking at automating the process for identifying them. He noted the harmonized table is looking good. Work continues on RTM ventilator terms. The RTM update should be available for TC ballot in about 10 days.  
 
  
−
CPs: A number of change proposals are in development. He suggested that the PIV WG review these as soon as possible.
 
−
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 89
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' | Verify process for “public comment” period
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd, John Rhoads
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.15
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). Also in Item 60: CPs will continue to be received as we go forward to the Connectathon. A number have been received. Paul noted that coordination with Continua will result in additional items. Todd requested that CPs be submitted now as the TF is reviewed. CPs addressing a WG profile will first be reviewed by the WG and then be brought to the TC. John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process.
 
−
'''
 
−
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 90
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' |
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
 
−
 
−
|-
 
−
| align="center" | 91
 
−
| '''<Action Item>''' |
 
−
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
 
−
| '''<Participants>''' |
 
−
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 
−
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
−
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
 
−
 
−
 
−
|}
 
−
 
−
== Participants ==
 
−
'''placeholder'''
 
−
 
−
:'''Chair:'''  Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)
 
−
 
−
: <TBD>
 
−
 
−
== Discussion ==
 
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 191: Line 56:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* Agenda approved '''PLACEHOLDER'''
+
:* Agenda approved
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 199: Line 64:
 
| '''Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
−
:* Discussion Summary of previous TC meeting '''PLACEHOLDER''' yielded no changes
+
:* Discussion Summary of previous two TC meetings were accepted
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
:*  
 
:*  
Line 208: Line 73:
 
| '''PCD Profiles Considered for Supplement and White Paper Development''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''PCD Profiles Considered for Supplement and White Paper Development''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:*  
+
:* Manny reminded participants that ballots that are out; two are due Monday, one Tuesday.
 +
:* John Rhoads led discussion of the RTM CPs. A ballot will be issued for approval.
 +
:* Steve led discussion of MEM WP. A ballot will be issued to release for public comment.
 +
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* Manny to check with Lisa if CPs need to go to other domains.
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 4
 
| align="center" | 4
−
| '''XXXX''' <br>- Todd
+
| '''Major Issues''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:*  
+
:* Todd reviewed existing major issues that are open and will be discussed in detail in future meetings:
 +
::- How optionality is tested and captured. He reviewed the discussion with Steve Moore and the upcoming discussion with Lisa Spellman. While Kudu isn’t set up for this Steve did agree to support a way to do this in January. This will permit companies to point to successful testing.
 +
::- Conformance testing for options will find its way into the users guide.
 +
::- Decisions related to choosing when to use ACM and DEC
 +
::- Verification and validation – Ken is developing a description of the regulatory meaning of these compared to what IHE and PCD accomplish.
 +
::- Rosetta mapping to minimize repetition of data in messages.
 +
:* Next week’s meeting will be a joint PC/TC meeting to discuss coordination between profiles and .
 +
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
Line 227: Line 103:
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* 60: Update TF -  
+
No changes except as noted.
 +
 
 +
:* 60: Update TF - Ken, John Rhoads, Todd will revise the TF to incorporate items already discussed. DEC will be updated with the options. Discussions will follow to determine how best to incorporate RTM, WCM in the TF.
 
:* 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations -  
 
:* 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations -  
 
:* 66: Prepare profiles for registration -  
 
:* 66: Prepare profiles for registration -  
Line 240: Line 118:
 
:* 87: IDCO -  
 
:* 87: IDCO -  
 
:* 88: Cycle 4 Supplements -  
 
:* 88: Cycle 4 Supplements -  
−
 
+
:* 89: Verify process for “public comment” period -
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 257: Line 135:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 7
 
| align="center" | 7
−
| '''PCD F2F Meeting''' <br>- Todd
+
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:*  
+
: 7. Web vs ftp vs Google Group vs Wiki pages: some documents are not easy to post on Wiki pages, some companies don’t provide access to ftp sites, etc. John asked for comments on difficulties with the use of these. Comments included success with the ability to use Filezilla or help from company IT to access ftp. GGs seem to work for WGs while developing materials, and use of ftp for the more widely distributed document. John Garguilo noted difficulty in identifying the latest version on the ftp site. Dates in the document title don’t always indicate the latest. Also, there is difficulty finding documents. Todd suggested an Action Item to develop a Wiki page for this purpose.
 +
: 8. WHIT was introduced. John Rhoads indicated that Philips may be interested.
 +
: *Preliminary agenda for F2F: suggestions were to start with PC, follow with Showcase, WGs and finally TC. Todd indicated this will be developed over the next few weeks.
 +
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
:* Manny to ask Lisa if the Barcelona WHIT is the once a year program and what is happening in Asia. Move to PC.
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* John Rhoads and Manny will address this.
  
  
Line 271: Line 154:
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
−
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 14:59, 17 May 2010

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly scheduled meeting of the PCD Technical Committee

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Weekly Tcons

Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

Preliminary agenda

Please add your suggestions

1. Agenda Approval
2. Review Discussion Summary: August 5 meeting PCD TC 2009-08-05 Webex
3. Review existing ballots and need for additional votes
4. RTM CPs: Review and approve ballot for approval.
5. Approve MEM - Medical Equipment Management White Paper for release to ballot
6. PCD Major Issue Review / Discussion
7. Web vs ftp vs Wiki: The question of usage
8. World of Health IT Barcelona March 15-18, 2010 http://www.worldofhealthit.org/index.asp
9. Action Item Review
10. Additional Business
11. Next Meeting

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items page.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Participants

Chair: Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)
Rita Brahmbatt, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Rich Hillman, Yarisa Jaroch, Brad Lunde, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, Yaikhomba Rajkumar, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Ioana Singureanu, Greg Staudenmaier, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • Discussion Summary of previous two TC meetings were accepted

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 PCD Profiles Considered for Supplement and White Paper Development
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • Manny reminded participants that ballots that are out; two are due Monday, one Tuesday.
  • John Rhoads led discussion of the RTM CPs. A ballot will be issued for approval.
  • Steve led discussion of MEM WP. A ballot will be issued to release for public comment.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • Manny to check with Lisa if CPs need to go to other domains.
4 Major Issues
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:
  • Todd reviewed existing major issues that are open and will be discussed in detail in future meetings:
- How optionality is tested and captured. He reviewed the discussion with Steve Moore and the upcoming discussion with Lisa Spellman. While Kudu isn’t set up for this Steve did agree to support a way to do this in January. This will permit companies to point to successful testing.
- Conformance testing for options will find its way into the users guide.
- Decisions related to choosing when to use ACM and DEC
- Verification and validation – Ken is developing a description of the regulatory meaning of these compared to what IHE and PCD accomplish.
- Rosetta mapping to minimize repetition of data in messages.
  • Next week’s meeting will be a joint PC/TC meeting to discuss coordination between profiles and .

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

5 Action Items
- Chairs 		Status/Discussion:

No changes except as noted.

  • 60: Update TF - Ken, John Rhoads, Todd will revise the TF to incorporate items already discussed. DEC will be updated with the options. Discussions will follow to determine how best to incorporate RTM, WCM in the TF.
  • 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations -
  • 66: Prepare profiles for registration -
  • 77: Ask HL7 to address gaps in v3 that affect PCD's ability to develop extensions to PIV -
  • 79: Change Proposals -
  • 80: Monitor HITSP’s Work (also on PC list) -
  • 82: OID for PCD -
  • 83: MOUs -
  • 84: Patient Identity and PCD Messages -
  • 85: NIST Tools for RTM -
  • 86: Test Tools -
  • 87: IDCO -
  • 88: Cycle 4 Supplements -
  • 89: Verify process for “public comment” period -

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Announcements
- All 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

7 Agenda Items
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:
7. Web vs ftp vs Google Group vs Wiki pages: some documents are not easy to post on Wiki pages, some companies don’t provide access to ftp sites, etc. John asked for comments on difficulties with the use of these. Comments included success with the ability to use Filezilla or help from company IT to access ftp. GGs seem to work for WGs while developing materials, and use of ftp for the more widely distributed document. John Garguilo noted difficulty in identifying the latest version on the ftp site. Dates in the document title don’t always indicate the latest. Also, there is difficulty finding documents. Todd suggested an Action Item to develop a Wiki page for this purpose.
8. WHIT was introduced. John Rhoads indicated that Philips may be interested.
*Preliminary agenda for F2F: suggestions were to start with PC, follow with Showcase, WGs and finally TC. Todd indicated this will be developed over the next few weeks.

Decisions/Issues:

  • Manny to ask Lisa if the Barcelona WHIT is the once a year program and what is happening in Asia. Move to PC.

Action(s):

  • John Rhoads and Manny will address this.


Next Meeting

The next TC meeting will be August 26 PCD TC 2009-08-26 Webex

PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_TC_2009-08-12_Webex&oldid=42364"