PCD TC 2013-03-20 Webex

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

TC Regularly Scheduled Meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Technical Committee

Regularly Scheduled Meeting Time

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1. Agenda Approval
2. Review Discussion Summary February 20: PCD TC 2013-02-20 Webex and February 6: PCD TC 2013-02-06 Webex
3. Detailed Proposals - need for volunteers
4. Status: TF, Supplement, Other Documents
5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase
- General issue: how to provide essential test partners?
- What to add to PCD Roadmap; What to add to Testing
6. Action Item Review (last reviewed Jan. 9; continue with 132)
- Item 123 - Close result of Phoenix meetings
7. Next and Recent Meetings
- PC and TC See List at Bottom of Page
- Face to Face week of April 15: Pump WG Monday, F2F Tuesday thru Friday at Westhealth, San Diego
o Web Page: see bottom of page
o Please submit agenda items
o Please "register"
7. Additional Business

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

References

The latest versions of published documents are at http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm#pcd and there is a list of CPs, which may, at any given time, affect a published document. The list is at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_CP_grid

Participants

Chair: John Garguilo
Chris Courville, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Barrett Franklin, John Garguilo, Bob Gold, Richard Lane, Jeff McGeath, Monroe Pattillo, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Discussion Summary of previous two meetings were accepted.
- Richard offered corrections to the Feb. 6 summary. Discussion followed regarding how best to accomplish testing and evaluating the more complex tests when developers are confident they will pass the simpler tests. Richard agreeing that monitors should evaluate the simpler tests before developers undertake the more complex tests when systems come to the Connectathon for the first time.
- John Garguilo indicated that he and John Rhoads will review the TF to be sure existing or needed CPs to be sure lessons learned from the Connecthons are incorporated. Some changes may have been made without formal votes on CPs. Another goal is to make sure the document is clear, without ambiguities.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
- As Noted
Status/Discussion:

3. Detailed Proposals:

- Reminder that volunteers are needed to accomplish the goals. He noted that IPEC has made substantial progress also needs work.

4. Status: TF, Etc.:

- WG leadership asks for review of the profiles in light of the Connectathon and address any issues and desired changes to enhance the profiles.
o What CPs are desired/required? Piggyback was discussed yesterday.
- John Garguilo noted that Monroe and Paul will address Rosetta for alarms, events. He indicated that Continua is interested in these. He said Rosetta is becoming well known and adopted by companies bringing devices to Continua.
- Manny asked about adoption of alarms/events by other domains. John noted that other domains’ adoption will require domain specific terminology. Monroe added that reluctance is based upon other domains have addressed the issue in their ways, and the immediacy is less of an issue.

5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase – Lessons Learned

- The Tuesday PCD Connectathon and Showcase WG has begun reviewing the existing tests. Members were encouraged to participate.
- WG leadership asked for review of the tests in light of the Connectathon and address any issues and desired changes to enhance the tests.
o What tests are desired/required?
- NIST is considering another tab to provide message structure to facilitate troubleshooting.

6. Action Items:

- Deferred

7. Meetings:

- Face to Face
o Members were asked to add suggestions for agenda topics.
o John Garguilo reminded members to make hotel reservations and to let the co-chairs and Manny know you are coming.
o Manny to provide updated registration information weekly.

8. New Business:

- John Garguilo referred to a new West Health report that provides important information on how to reduce the cost of healthcare.


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meetings

The next meetings are:

TC April 3, 2013 PCD TC 2013-04-03 Webex

PC&TC April 10, 2013 PCD PC&TC 2013-04-10 Webex

PC&TC Face to Face April 16-19, 2013 PCD PC&TC 2013 April 16 to 19 F2F

Joint PC&TC April 24, 2013 PCD PC&TC 2013-04-24 Webex

PCD Home