PCD Pump 2011-11-02 WebEx

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

(Infusion Pump Main Page)


Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Infusion Pump Working Group discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD Infusion Pump WG

Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Time: 14:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes'


Note: Specific web & phone information will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1. Review today's Agenda
2. Review Initial Device Specialization - Infusion Pump Content Profile Detailed Proposal
3. Discuss Harmonization of ACM and IPEC Content (per 2011.10 F2F discussion)
4. Open Discussion
5. Next Meeting Schedule & Agenda

Attachments / Materials

  • <add attachments links here>


Discussion Notes

Chair/Host: Jeff Rinda (Hospira)
Participants: George Bertos (Baxter), Todd Cooper (BSF), Al Engelbert (ProtoLink), Jack Hoffman (B.Braun), John Rhoads (Philips), Erin Sparnon (ECRI), Khalid Zubaidi (CareFusion)


NOTE: Action Item Review updates have been posted directly to the Infusion Pump Action Items wiki page


Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Didn't quite get the Agenda reviewed and approved ...

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):

2 Detailed Proposal Review
- Todd
Status/Discussion:

Since the F2F in Kansas City (2011.10), Todd has started to create an DS-IP (Device Specialization - Infusion Pump) Detailed Work Item proposal based on:

Discussion focused on the first issue identified in that draft DS-IP document:

Title: Device Specialization - Infusion Pump Content Profile

Questions focused on ...

  • Is this a pure content value set specification or is it a profile?
  • Profile implies definition of Actors, Transactions, and (optionally) Semantic Content
  • If it is a content profile, do we need to define some "dummy" actors to be able to call out the content or leverage existing actors?
  • What is done elsewhere in IHE technical frameworks (e.g., ITI and PCC)?
  • Is one approach more efficient than the other? (i.e., easier to develop)
  • Is one approach more extensible to other device modalities and profile usages than the other?
  • What becomes a profile vs. an option? (not a black & white line)
  • Etc. Etc. Etc.

Decisions/Issues:

  • Formalize the work item objectives and options more clearly and validate with IHE experts (esp. Moore and Garguilo)

Action(s):

  • Published initial draft of the DS-IP detailed proposal working document (Todd)
  • Draft slide deck capturing DS-IP for presentation at next meeting (Todd)
  • Review slides with Steve Moore before next meeting (Todd)
  • Review slides with John Garguilo / NIST before next meeting (Todd)
3 ...
- TBD
Status/Discussion:


Decisions/Issues:


4 ...
- TBD
Status/Discussion:


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


5 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Topics will begin with a review of the DP-IP Detailed Proposal Slide Deck

Action(s):


Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 14:00 (Eastern) on 2011.11.09 (60 minutes)


(Reviewed & approved by PCD Infusion Pump WG on 2011.11.09


PCD Home