Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24

Attendees:

• Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
• Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
• Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
• Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
• Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
• David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
• Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
• Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
• Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
• Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
• John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
• Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
• Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
• Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting

The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.

Proposal Review

The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).

Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.

• Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
• Some work may be required for NM
• Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
• German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring

The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:

Proposal	Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort	Straw Poll
Radiation Dose	25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics	2
Enhanced DICOM	35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine) 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)	3
Mammo CAD Workflow	35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)	0
PDI for Large Datasets	30%	4
Mammo Acquisition Workflow	35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF	3
Scheduled Workflow 2.0	200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition. 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies. 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.	6
Critical Results	N/A	0

Reporting is going to move out of band.

Work Package Nominations

Eight alternative work packages were nominated.

Package	Work Items (and % effort)	Ballot 1	Ballot 2	Ballot 3
Package A	Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)	3	5	7
Package B	SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%)	0	-	-
Package C	SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%)	2	2	-
Package D	Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%)	1	-	-
Package E	Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%)	1	-	-
Package F	Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%)	2	3	3
Package G	Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%)	1	-	-
Package H	SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%)	0	-	-

Selection

Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)