PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items

Closed Items 60 - 69

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
60	Update TF	Todd, Ken	John Rhoads	2011.12.31	Closed	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). The update will include PIB, SPD. Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. Manny to develop the essential elements of the Integration Statements and check to see if the requirement for PCD-01 from the DOR to the DOF is clearly written. Robert is leading a group addressing the issues with PAM ITI-30 and 31. Paul noted that web services will provide additional benefits such as security. The profile updates to HL7 v 2.6 will be folded in. Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Dec. 18. John Garguilo noted Bikram’s observation about OBR field lengths. He recommended discussion and decision, perhaps using RE for those not used. Paul noted that there will be CPs coming out of coordination with Continua. Feb. 24, 2010: Updating TF is in progress, addressing non-controversial items. A draft of Volume 2 will be available shortly. Volume 3, delayed, will contain much of what was in Volume 2. CPs for Continua harmonization will be incorporated before the revised TF is issued for ballot. June 30, 2010: Change date to Sept. 15. September 22, 2010: Todd is working on TF Volume 3 which will include what was Volume 2 Appendix D. Manny to ask Todd for a potential date. April 6, 2010: Change due date to April 27 and note open ballot. John Rhoads noted that one more CP regarding OBX-18 may come in response to the ballot. Then a new TI version will be developed with items not yet ready for FT. May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: FT will be balloted by June 15 and Ken, John will edit Volumes 1 and 2 for next iteration in the future. August 17, 2011: Volumes 1 and 2 have been published in Final Text. Todd is working on volume 3. Todd is also working on a CP to clarify the security wording. Close, open new with cycle. Leads: Ken, John Rhoads, Todd.
62	Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible?	Todd	Co-chairs	2009.07.01	Closed	Please see summary of June 3 for history http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_TC_2009-06-03_Webex#Discussion. John Rhoads reviewed the topic as discussed at the DCC. Ken and Todd took this to the DCC approximately 6 months ago. The DCC suggested PCD take the lead and coordinate the various IHE Domain. John indicated this was the same approach the DCC took again recently. Todd noted that Khalid is developing an approach for DPI and asked that John take this back to the DCC and he agreed to do so. Paul asked if bar codes (which are available in different standards) are the only identifier of interest. Others could include the patient’s photo. Todd suggested the PC draft a brief profile proposal that could be used to recruit ITI, Radiology and possibly PCC to join the effort. John asked Khalid if he would lead this effort and Khalid agreed to give this some thought. Paul noted that PCD-01 permits multiple patient identifiers. Change date to July 1. October 28, 2009: Bar coding can be folded into patient ID (#84). Close.
66	HL7 IHE-PCD Integration (Message) Profiles (i.e., Message Workbench [MWB] profiles)	John Garguilo	Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.	OPEN	Closed	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others); initial versions are available and can be enhanced for future (cycles) use. Gary is maintaining MWB profiles and NIST bases/develops their message context validation files based on the MWB HL7 profiles. Volunteers are requested to help on the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). For ACM, Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 is currently stable. Gary will work on PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO (for PCD-09). Gary noted that the MWB tool permits building the message, while that is not available in the NIST tools. John Garguilo noted that the MWB also provides the capability to execute (or simulate) a sending/receiving system for testing. NIST is working on building Test Agents to achieve similar functionality and John will provide updates as the Agents are written in software. September 22, 2010: John Garguilo will ask members to take responsibility for maintaining the profiles and keep the latest version on the ftp site. Companies will be able to constrain these further. Gary will lead an effort to coordinate this. Manny indicated that the MWB and Peter Rontey’s tutorial are posted on the ftp site. If any changes are required members should send Manny an email. Peter has limited time available because his responsibilities have changed. He may have room in an upcoming tutorial but is not offering tutorials regularly. April 6, 2010: John Garguilo suggested that this will be less of an issue with further development of NIST tools. John Garguilo will take the lead and attempt to gather the latest versions. He noted that Peter Rontey is unable to maintain the tool, but it may still be useful as a system to test against until the NIST tool provides that service. Al noted that another use for the MWB is to have a local system. John Rhoads suggested that it also provides useful reports. HL7 continues to recognize the MWB as a tool. Al asked if the NIST tool will produce an XML conformance profile. The NIST tools will accept XML profiles and might provide the conformance profile to use in the MWB. This will permit the MWB profiles to be updated in synch with NIST updates. John Rhoads suggested that GForge be used for version control. Date changed to May 31. August 17, 2011: Change date to Open. January 3, 2012: There was a consensus that: With the availability of NIST’s interactive tool and NIST making the XML files (“performance profiles”) available, this Action Item will no longer be needed. John Garguilo suggested closing this item and opening a new Action Item for Performance Profiles that would be used with tools such as SPY, MWB. Al suggested that the NIST tool is sufficient. Robert indicated that the XML files, the MWB and the NIST tool are helpful. A new item will be added, with Robert and John Garguilo responsible.
67	Integration Profile Registration (w/ OID Defs)	John Garguilo	Al Engelbert, John Rhoads, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.	2010.09.29	Close	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). Note that once the final TF Vols are produce in early 2010, verify that the OIDs registered with IHE are still correct. April 6, 2010: Close. PCD has OIDs now. Al Engelbert asked if the OID will change as a profile changes. John Garguilo responded that another element, .x, will be added and reflect the version. OIDs are tracked on a Wiki page. Once the PCD Technical Framework (Vols I and II) comment period ends (early September 2010) and the final versions are available (Trial Implementation Version), OIDs for the IHE-PCD Integration Profile transactions can be registered with Steve Moore at IHE. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. See [[1]]

Closed Items 70 - 79

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
77	Preparing a Proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG (new name)	Gary Meyer	Jeff Rinda, Al Engelbert	2010.03.31	Close	Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Gary is monitoring the Pharmacy WG. They are focused on community practice. Gary suggested that about a third of this work will be useful for institutional practice. Ruth noted that HITSP is working on the ordering process. NCPCP is working on an HL7 2.5 messaging process. This work is US focused and may become an issue internationally. They may not be interested in addressing this in this cycle (Atlanta the week of Sept. 21). Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Feb. 20. June 30, 2010: Close as completed.
79	Change Proposal Tutorial			2009.07.01	CLOSE	Provide a tutorial on filing Change Proposals. These have been suggested and need CPs: ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; Infusion Pump: clarify coding. John Rhoads / Todd Cooper to contact those developing CPs to ensure the process is understood and properly managed.

Closed Items 80 - 89

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
83	MOUs	Sandy	Ken	2010.05.03	Closed	Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. John Garguilo reported they had a meeting with the FDA and updated them on NIST tools and their work with PCD. June 30, 2010: Move to PC.
84	Patient Identity and PCD Messages	Todd, Khalid, Gary		2009.07.01	Close	How best to accomplish this tie will be addressed in the white paper for further development as a supplement to PIB (Todd). Coordination with IEEE (-20103 CCOM) and ICE-PAC will be accomplished Jan. Draft a patient association brief profile proposal (Khalid). The A04 registration message is not the commonly used message, while A01 is used by hospitals at admission (Gary). Gary will review this issue and it will be factored into the CPs for publication and testing in the 2010 Connectathon. Also see 62. Note related discussions in the Infusion Pump WG.Dec. 9, 2009" Close; folded into detailed profile proposal.
86	Test Tools	John Garguilo, Rob Snellick	Manny	2009.07.15	Close	NIST will explore a registry for MWB files (Rob). Manny to request PCD Connectathon WG to post MWB files. Change date to June 17, add John Garguilo to the effort. NIST is open to providing incremental releases of "test artifacts" (which include MWB profiles). Need to determine when such information is desired to be available for viewing/browsing. This information would be part of the Testing Infrastructure as part of a public repository. Can we establish a date to make this available by? Members were asked to send Garguilo any MWB files that should be considered when developing registered profiles. Dec. 9, 2009: Close; NIST will add stable profiles to their registry. Combine with #66.
87	IDCO	Nick		2009.07.01	CLOSED	For history see history tab and previous meetings. Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future. John Garguilo indicated the WG is currently addressing RTM issues. IDCO leadership will be invited to report at the next TC meeting.
88	Cycle 4 Supplement Status	Ken, Todd		2009.07.01	Close	John Rhoads, Monroe, Paul offered to review the WCM document. Cycle 4 Supplement Status - Anticipated release dates are: IDCO - June 1; PIV - June 1; RTM - June 1; WCM - September 1. White Papers: DPI and MEM will be available this summer. PIV: Recent WG F2F: Todd briefly summarized the meeting. Those interested are referred to the Wiki page (see agenda list above). He noted it was a very productive meeting. RTM update: Paul found 40 errors and as a result is looking at automating the process for identifying them. He noted the harmonized table is looking good. Work continues on RTM ventilator terms. The RTM update should be available for TC ballot in about 10 days. CPs: A number of change proposals are in development. He suggested that the PIV WG review these as soon as possible. Dec. 2, 2009: Close.
89	Verify process for “public comment” period	Todd, John Rhoads		2010.03.31	Close	For history see history tab. Address common procedure for all domains where the domain keeps the submitting organization informed of progress. Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process. 2010.03.17: Ioana has submitted a revision of the process for consideration. June 30, 2010: Close as completed.

Closed Items 90 - 99

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
90	Brief Profile Proposals	As Noted	See WGs	2009.10.05	Close	Summary as of Sept. 9: - RTLS - Ken will write up Brief Profile Proposal - MEM - Steve will write up Brief Profile Proposal - ACM to Enterprise - Monroe will write up Brief Profile Proposal for Extending ACM to Enterprise - Point of Care ID Management - Khalid, Todd will write up Brief Profile Proposal - Multi-Parameter Clinical Decision Support Data Integration, Communication and Analysis (MPCDSICA) - Location Tracking - Middleware Metrics (Brief Proposal) - QBD - Query for Bulk Data Brief Profile Proposals due the 25th, for PCD, ITI. Next week’s PCD PC meeting will include a review of the proposals received. Initial discussion will be held in advance of F2F. Dec. 9, 2009: Close.
91	Making the LOA optional			2009 Dec. 2	Close	From F2F: Making the LOA optional without any detail is problematic. The group asked about: what is the rationale for Item 2 and why is section E optional? Patent Disclosure Wiki Page = IHE should modify page to provide link to the disclosure and to segment the page by profile and actor. Take to DCC. Dec. 9, 2009: Close; activity is at Board level.
92	Grouped Actors		Manny	2010.05.03	Close	F2F: Did Kudu registration permit signing up for DOR as a grouped actor? Dec. 9, 2009: Pending discussion at DCC. June 30, 2010: Close as addressed by removing this as potentially available to PIB. PIB will become a suggestion or reference to PAM, PDQ that are separate and distinct ITI profiles.
94	TF Gaps to Fill	Ruth		2009 Nov. 18	Close	Ruth will check status of ITI HL7 ACK text for PCD-03. Feb. 24, 2010: Manny to ask Ruth for update.June 30, 2010: Close.
95	ADT Binding for Pumps	Ruth, Gary		2009.Nov. 18	Close	F2F: See Thursday, Discussion Item 6; added Oct. 14. Close; will be in detailed profile proposal.
96	Add ITI-31 (PAM PCD) to the TF	Robert, John Rhoads		2010.03.31	Close	November 18: Robert raised the need for ITI-31 for PCD; this will be added to the TF. Robert working on CP. June 30, 2010: Close in favor of Patient Device Association addressing this issue. Open new item to obtain all ADT support required. PAM, PDQ, PEC. Open new item for PDA with possible interim document.
97	QoS and a QoD (quality of data) issues need to be addressed within the alarm/alert communications	Monroe, Ken		2010.08.30	Closed	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010 afternoon, item 2: (a) build the ability to identify these issues and (b) implement a response. An alert and/or log should be sent/noted when it is needed. May 26, 2010: Monroe has begun work. Initial proposal on how to proceed June 30. June 30, 2010: Change date. April 6, 2010: Close with reference to 60601-8 and its reference to end-to-end delay.
98	Open source solution to archiving persistent data	Ken, Vaughan Zakian		2010.06.30	Closed	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Ken and Vaughan will address an open source solution to archiving persistent data. May 26, 2010: Ken will contact Vaughan and report back the end of June. April 6, 2010: Close.
99	Review 2010, Develop 2011 Test Cases	Manny	John Garguilo	2010.09.25	Closed	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Manny will schedule review of existing test cases and then extensions and new test cases [Complete]. Manny will add device identification and chain of data to the list of potential changes to testing [Comlete]. May 26, 2010: Summer, with a plan in a couple of weeks. June 30, 2010: Reviews have begun, changed due date to end of Aug. Tuesday sessions held [and completed] for DEC, PIV, ACM, and IDCO test case review. Test cases are being revised and reviewed a second time during first 3 weeks of Sept. 2010 April 6, 2011: noted this was closed Oct. 4, 2010.

Closed Items 100 - 109

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
100	CPs: PCD-01, PCD-02, ACM, ACK, ITI-31, RTM, other			2010.06.02	Close	Initiated F2F May: CPs will be submitted, after revisions if necessary. All were supported by those present. Pump WG will address at least two. Monroe will revise ACM TI. Manny to ask John Donnelly to seek vendors to test, implement at Showcase. May 26, 2010: Manny to get CPs out when available. Recruit needed vendors - move to PC. June 30, 2010: Close. Vendor recruiting to be a PC responsibility.
101	Selection of WCTP by ACM	Monroe		2010.06.30	Closed	Initiated F2F May 5, 2010: Todd will seek the MOU for ACM's WCTP.org issue. May 26, 2010: Monroe indicated that WCTP will be used and a CP will be prepared by the WG and submitted to the TC. Todd asked if this will be an option or the single approach. Monroe indicated that both this and SMTP should be accepted and WCTP will be promoted. Todd noted that wired vs. wireless needs to be addressed in the future. CP for ballot and TI available June 30. June 30, 2010: Manny to ping Steve Moore about SMTP and WCTP and learn if it is necessary to lose SMTP. Open Action Item for WCTP MOU (PC). Manny to contact Monroe re ballot for WCTP (TC). The question of whether this is a revised supplement or a CP is to be made by the ACM WG. Monroe and Ken will lead the effort. April 6, 2010: Was closed Sept. 1, 2010.
102	Numeric Array (NA) data type			2010.06.02	Closed	Initiated F2F May 6, 2010: Seek restoration of the Numeric Array (NA) data type. May 26, 2010: Wait to discuss with John Rhoads. Todd noted that HL7 v.7 should go to ballot shortly. The alarm trigger is included. NA could be included in v.2.8. Monroe asked if the TI version of ACM should assume positive ballot on v.7. This should be discussed at the next TC meeting. June 30, 2010: Close because John Garguilo believes this data type can be used. April 6, 2010: Was closed earlier.
103	DPI/ICE-PAC Project			2010.05.26	Close	Initiated F2F May 7, 2010: Define the next steps and enroll vendors to develop this in time for the Connectathon and Showcase. This would include: a technical report, and possibly technical documents such draft supplements for DPI or other. This would be a demonstration testing for a New Directions wall. Philips and Draeger expressed interest. Draft a project plan targeting (a) specification development over the summer, (b) prototyping in the fall / early winter, (c) demonstration testing event, (d) public demonstration during HIMSS '11 (end of February in Orlando). Jon B. offered to recruit vendors & organize. May 26, 2010: Add Todd. Todd developed a Google Group. Rapid Device Configuration (RDC) is the project name. The intent of the item has been met. Close.
104	CDA (HL 7 v.3)			2010.05.26	Close	Initiated F2F May 7, 2010: They will set up meetings and Wiki pages. John Rhoads will poll participants to set a meeting time. May 26: 19.Todd reported that this was discussed in detail in Rio. John will take this forward. The GAS WG (anesthesia) is also working in this area, with effort on a CDA report. Close.
105	Obtain all ADT support required for Connectathon, Showcase	Manny	Cochairs	August 4, 2010.	Closed	June 30: Include PAM, PDQ, PEC. April 6, 2010: Close as implemented.
106	PCIM			May 31, 2011.	Closed	June 30: Possibly to include interim document. April 6, 2010: Change name to PCI from PDA. Change date. May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny and the cochairs of the WG will establish meeting times and Webex support for the PCIM WG. Doodle survey is out. Close as underway.
107	NIST Extensions	John Garguilo	Sandra Martinez	December 8, 2010	CLOSED	Wednesday, Oct. 20: NIST Test Agent extension work for all Integration Profiles will be discussed with each WG. Nov 2010, Sandra resolved issues via email with Integration Profile WGs.
108	Prioritize Escalated Alarms	Monroe Pattillo	ACM WG	2012.04.23	CLOSE	Wednesday, Oct. 20: ACM - AC will prioritize alarm and communication when messages are escalated. ACM will add a requirement to notify the person receiving an escalated message that the alarm has been escalated and has an associated delay from the initial alarm. The AC may make decisions on how to prioritize and escalate the message. This may have implications for the AM and perhaps AR. April 6, 2010: Change date to May 31. Feb. 8, 2012: Change date to Change date to April 23. Todd suggested setting a day aside before the F2F. Manny to ballot the F2F dates – Tues-Fri vs Mon-Tues and devote Monday to the alarm work (ACM WG). July 25, 2012: The AR has the ability to raise the priority in the PCD-04 and that will be forwarded in the PCD-06. The updated TI has addressed this. CLOSE as completed.

Closed Items 110-119

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
110
111
112
113	Containment Issue	John Rhoads	John Garguilo	October 18, 2011	Close	May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: John Rhoads will lead further discussion of the Containment Issue. Due after next HL7 meeting, September 21. August 17, 2011: Change date to Oct. 18. Feb. 8, 2012: This relates to the underlying model and RTM, will be part of volume 3. Close as addressed in volume 3.
114
115	Pump WG CPs	Brad	Pump WG	June 15, 2011	Closed	May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny asked the Pump WG to consider a CP to add the final step of user approval to initiate infusion to the technical documentation. This was discussed last week in the WG meeting and withdrawn as out of scope. Brad is making some changes to the CPs in development and they will then be balloted. The CPs will be balloted together, soon. August 17, 2011: Close as completed.
116	IDCO CPs	Tom, Nick	IDCO WG	June 29, 2011	CLOSE	May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Tom and Nick will move the CPs to have them available for ballot no later than the end of June. Feb. 8, 2012: John Garguilo reported that there are discrepancies between what was tested and what was published. July 25, 2012: Complete. CLOSE
117	IDCO Time Stamp WP	Tom, Nick	IDCO WG, Paul	Nov 6, 2013	CLOSED	May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Paul will work with IDCO on the time stamp WP. June 29 for status report. Feb. 8, 2012: Discussion reflected the difficulties and limitations, but there is a desire that IDCO address this. Sept. 5, 2012: Change date to April 1, 2013. Jan. 9, 2013: Manny to ping Paul. Oct. 2, 2013: Change date to Oct. 9. Oct 23: Paul Sc - have good faith UTC mapping. IDCO plans to attend 2015 Connectathon. Manny asked Paul to have IDCO submit a CP to indicate CT compliance. Closed Oct 23
118
119	Newborn Hearing Terminology NOTE: this had been 111; discovered that there were two with this number 8/17/11	Nitin Kunte	Paul Schluter, John Garguilo	January 5, 2011	Closed	Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2010: Discussion to include proposed new terminology in a systematic and consistent way via the RTM Integration Profile. April 6, 2011: Close as implemented.

Closed Items 120-129

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
120
121	ACM ADQ-DDA CP	Monroe Pattillo		___	CLOSE	F2F Oct. 2011: Submit a CP around the absence of an AA actor and the option to use the proposed ADQ-DDA actor in place of AA. July 25, 2012: This is the actor for archiving data because the archiver actor was removed. John Rhoads suggested this can be a cross reference to another profile. CLOSE as addressed in ADQ.
122	Wiki Page for Local Information	John Garguilo		September 30, 2012	Close	F2F Oct. 2011: Add IHE-PCD Wiki page which provides local information - to include 'local' Trigger Events (labels starting with ^Z01). This page should also include other local IHE-PCD information such as local value sets, error codes, etc. Recommendation was to add this information to the existing OID page for IHE-PCD. Cochairs 11/15/11: Change date to Dec. 9. July 23. 2012: This is for Connectathon usage and for Local Tables that will be in a profile. Change due date to September 30. John Rhoads has added a reference section on the PCD Wiki page to link to these pages. This handy element at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Category:PCD_Reference_Pages is available now. Nov. 12, 2012: Completed at October F2F. Close.
123
124	WCM Recast	Ken Fuchs	John Rhoads	___	CLOSE	F2F Oct. 2011: Restructure Document, consider an Actor Option (note: Option has to do w/ profile - e.g., Waveform option for DEC), add changes identified by the test effort (pointed out in Sandra's slides). If possible, demonstrate this work as part of HIMSS '12 'New Directions area' or within a PCD story - possibility to demo/proof of concept WCM at Connectathon and/or Virtual Connectathon. Manny will investigate new directions area at HIMSS12 (see PC action items). Provide a spreadsheet providing list of waveforms, and research waveform types (John Rhoads). Cochairs 11/15/11: Ken suggested that the use of OBR may address several issues by providing context, providing WCM with a structure similar to ACM. July 25, 2012: Addressed in the Mahwah summit (see notes). CLOSE as complete.
125
126	RTM/RTMMS: Address Missing Descriptions	Paul, John Garguilo	10101a	Open	CLOSED	F2F Oct. 2011: Consider a 'project' or plan of how to identify descriptors in IEEE/missing - start with a search in RTMMS? Figure out, develop a roadmap plan and resource plan of how to resolve what is not complete or missing. (A) List of terms - but no other fields (not as trivial as one might think…); (B) Looking down the descriptor field, it's non-normative - and thus thin (start w/ a search). Question from Todd, item assigned to Jan Wittenber with help from Sandra? July 23. 2012: Pending notification from IEEE. Change date to August 22. November 7, 2012: IEEE has agreed to the inclusion of IEEE terms in the tables. Pending IEEE to provide official announcement making this available through RTMMS by the end of November. Change Descriptor to “Descriptions”. Jan. 9, 2013: no due date; open. June 19, 2013: New vent terms completed, 57 others and pump terms in process for 10101a. Add 10101a to the participants. July 10, 2013: Paul Schluter announced today’s meeting will address the recent ISO meeting and acceptance of the ventilator terminology. The WG is working on 10101a including infusion pump terms. There will be an opportunity for last minute additions before submission. Nov 6, 2013: Will be in place by Jan. Close
127	DCM (Detailed Clinical Model for Devices)	Ioana		__	Closed	F2F Oct. 2011: Develop/provide a publication in a form that will be given to IHE-PCD. Cochairs Nov. 22, 2011: Moved to TC Tracking; not an Action Item.
128	Harmonization of Security Considerations	Todd		__	CLOSE	F2F Oct. 2011: Finalize and submit CP - across profiles regarding harmonization of security considerations text. Request more detailed scope from Todd. August 8, 2012: Close as Complete.
129	TF Volume 2 to Include Examples	Todd	Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders	__	CLOSE	F2F Oct. 2011: Consider a change to TF Vol II to include examples of containment sequencing. August 8, 2012: Close as Complete.
130

Closed Items 130-139

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
130	TF Vol. 2 Issue	John Rhoads		Nov. 30, 2011	Closed	F2F Oct. 2011: Explore how to (or if) volume 2 needs to explicitly reflect that consumer actors need to gracefully process unknown (but properly formed) data. In other words if a DOC receives WCM OBX’s and doesn’t know how to process them it should continue on and not bomb out. Cochairs Nov. 15, 2011: Moved to TC. August 8, 2012: Close as Complete.
131	Update Technical Framework	Ken Fuchs, John Rhoads, Todd Cooper		April?	Closed	January 4, 2012: Update the Final Text after the 2012 N A Connectathon. Completion in time for Public Comment period, publication in time for the 2013 Connectathon process. August 8, 2012: Close as Complete.
132					OPEN
133 - was PC Action Item 138	TF Vol. 2 Issue	John Rhoads		Nov. 30, 2011	CLOSE	F2F Oct. 2011: Explore how to (or if) volume 2 needs to explicitly reflect that consumer actors need to gracefully process unknown (but properly formed) data. In other words if a DOC receives WCM OBX’s and doesn’t know how to process them it should continue on and not bomb out. Cochairs Nov. 15, 2011: Move to TC.
134	DCM		Steve Merritt, Manny Furst		Close	F2F May 16, 2012: Paul suggested that Use Cases help promote participation. He suggested adding elements to PCD-01 as a content module for MEM. Consider a "new directions" demonstration of MEM at HIMSS12 and use it to recruit CMMS and RTLS vendors. Manny to lead recruiting of vendors. Nov. 12, 2012: Move to the PC and notify them: Develop a prioritized list and a group to promote the effort.
135					OPEN
136					OPEN
137	PIV: User Approval to Initiate Infusion				CLOSED	F2F May 18, 2012: Brad to ask the Pump WG to consider a CP to add to the technical documentation: the final step is user approval to initiate infusion. June 20, 2012: Paul suggested making this optional as a workflow item to be considered for documentation. July 10, 2013: Al reviewed this as a potential addition requiring the clinician to review the program before initiating the infusion. John Rhoads suggested that this be incorporated in the TF with a CP. Paul Schluter suggested that in an environment with close clinical supervision there may not be a need for the clinician to “push the button”, such as for an anesthesiologist in the OR or in a closed loop system. He suggested a standardized display which provides safety. Oct 24, 2013, TC and Pump WG deterined that this is no longer an issue (ITEM CLOSED)
138	Containment	John Rhoads			Close	F2F May 18, 2012: John Rhoads will lead further discussion of the device, alarm, event Containment issue. June 20, 2012: This is in process. August 8, 2012: Close as complete (accomplished in Volume 2).
139	HL7 v.2.8 Change	Monroe		October 16, 2012	Closed	HL7 v.2.8 Change. August 8, 2012: Monroe reported that HL7 has a ballot that changes a field from CWE to original text. This has implications for ACM. Nov. 7, 2012: Will proceed with existing this cycle. If the standard changes ACM will adjust. Close.

Closed Items 140-149

No.	Action Item	Owner	Participants	Due	Open/Closed	Description/Update
140					OPEN
141					OPEN
142	Create a template for Security and Privacy		John Rhoads, John Garguilo, Todd, Axel?	March 1, 2013	Closed	Oct. F2F 2012: Create a template for Profile Authors for Security and Privacy (as part of a resource page) – John Rhoads noted that this would be PCD specific (as there are differing views from other domains). July 10, 2013: Closed as complete.
143					OPEN
144	Rosetta Events and Alarms	Paul, Monroe		1/26/2013	Closed	Oct. F2F 2012: Capture 11073 semantics for events and alarms and their phases and content models. July 10, 2013: Close as underway
145	Anatomy of an Event or Alarm	Paul, Monroe		12/30/2012	Closed	Oct. F2F 2012: Provide Paul feedback on his Event and Alarm Identifiers proposal. Paul created two examples -to compare two approaches of events sent as a phase vs. event, “numeric” and “named” alarm. July 10, 2013: Close as underway
146					OPEN
147					OPEN
148					OPEN
149	POI NIST Tests	Ioana, John Garguilo		11/16/2012	CLOSED	Oct. F2F 2012: Ioana described questions for the participating systems regarding implementation questions. John Garguilo proposed four simple tests. John and Ioana to establish this cycle's tests. August 21, 2013: Test updated and loaded in tooling. Close as completed

Closed Items 150-159

No.	Action Item	Owner	Participants	Due	Open/Closed	Description/Update
150					OPEN
151					OPEN
152					OPEN
153					OPEN
154	CPs Resulting From the Connectathon	John Garguilo	John Rhoads	April 17, 2013	CLOSED	Feb. 20, 2013: Develop CPs resulting from the Connectathon process. John Garguilo encouraged review of supplements that may be included in the TF. He recommended setting a portion of the F2F aside for discussion of the CPs. CPs should be available early in the cycles. August 21, 2013: Closed
155					OPEN
156	Change ACM to Alert Communication Management	Monroe		May 22, 2013	CLOSED	Spring 2013 F2F: CP to change the names, etc. of the ACM profile to Alert Communication Management with the messages intended for human response (various priorities) to include physiological and technical alarms and advisories (cf alarms) consistent with 11073. May 1: Will be completed this week with pie chart replacing Venn diagram.August 21, 2013 - closed
157					OPEN
158					OPEN
159					OPEN

Closed Items 160-169

No.	Action Item	Owner	Participants	Due	Open/Closed	Description/Update
160					OPEN
161					OPEN
162					OPEN
163					OPEN
164					OPEN
165					OPEN
166					OPEN
167					OPEN
168					OPEN
169					OPEN

Closed Items 170-179

No.	Action Item	Owner	Participants	Due	Open/Closed	Description/Update
170					OPEN
171					OPEN
172					OPEN
173					OPEN
174					OPEN
175					OPEN
176					OPEN
177					OPEN
178					OPEN
179					OPEN

Go to PCD Technical Committee Action Items page.

Go to Patient Care Device home.