Difference between revisions of "PCD Cochair Action Items"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Action Items 100-109: move 103 to closed) |
(→Action Items 100-109: update with 2/12/13) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| '''<Due Date>''' | 11/21/2012 | | '''<Due Date>''' | 11/21/2012 | ||
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN | | '''<Status>''' |OPEN | ||
− | | '''<Comments>:''' | October 2012 F2F: PCD to submit proposed improvements. E.g., Section 0 (IHE Overview). Completed this portion 10/31. Example: Last sentence - does not mention anything about devices - only information systems - do we as a domain propose adding "medical devices". IHE-PCD Group will flush out actual suggested language. | + | | '''<Comments>:''' | October 2012 F2F: PCD to submit proposed improvements. E.g., Section 0 (IHE Overview). Completed this portion 10/31. Example: Last sentence - does not mention anything about devices - only information systems - do we as a domain propose adding "medical devices". IHE-PCD Group will flush out actual suggested language. Jan. 22,2013: John Garguilo to again request feedback. '''Feb. 12, 2013: John learned that the comments must be sent on a specific form. He will follow up.. ''' |
|- | |- | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| '''<Due Date>''' | 11/28/2012 | | '''<Due Date>''' | 11/28/2012 | ||
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN | | '''<Status>''' |OPEN | ||
− | | '''<Comments>:''' | October 2012 F2F: Set date, location for spring F2F: Week of April 8, 15 suggested. Manny to poll membership. | + | | '''<Comments>:''' | October 2012 F2F: Set date, location for spring F2F: Week of April 8, 15 suggested. Manny to poll membership. Nov. 13, 2012: Manny to ask Todd about West Health San Diego. Offer either week, with preference to the earlier week (Apr. 8). '''Feb. 12, 2013: Manny to ping those who indicated they can’t attend either days to ask if it is a preference or absolute. ''' |
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| '''<Due Date>''' | April 22, 2013 | | '''<Due Date>''' | April 22, 2013 | ||
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN | | '''<Status>''' |OPEN | ||
− | | '''<Comments>:''' | Dec. 18, 2012: Ken suggested that PCD may want to version the profiles. Mindray is considering how best to version their product in reference to the PCD message version. Discussion indicated this can be identified in the MSH and it would be useful to include this information in the Integration Statement. Monroe suggested that the NIST tool will need to accommodate multiple OIDs. | + | | '''<Comments>:''' | Dec. 18, 2012: Ken suggested that PCD may want to version the profiles. Mindray is considering how best to version their product in reference to the PCD message version. Discussion indicated this can be identified in the MSH and it would be useful to include this information in the Integration Statement. Monroe suggested that the NIST tool will need to accommodate multiple OIDs. Jan. 22, 2013: Place on F2F agenda. Change date to April 22. Add Monroe, John Garguilo. '''Feb. 12, 2013: Add to F2F. ''' |
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 108 | | align="center" | 108 | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| '''<Due Date>''' | April 15, 2013 | | '''<Due Date>''' | April 15, 2013 | ||
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN | | '''<Status>''' |OPEN | ||
− | | '''<Comments>:''' | Integration Statements Limited to Commercially Available, not to be posted otherwise. | + | | '''<Comments>:''' | Integration Statements Limited to Commercially Available, not to be posted otherwise. Jan. 22, 2013: Wait for response to the comment (see #104). '''Feb. 12, 2013: Monroe suggested that a different form of IS may be needed because the IS in its present form has been around a long time. Steve objected, saying no IS should be permitted unless it is available. John Garguilo asked if a similar situation occurs with certification and Monroe indicated that it would. Monroe will assume leadership. This is an issue identified in the comments noted in Item 104. Add to F2F. ''' |
|- | |- |
Revision as of 22:13, 16 February 2013
See also PCD Cochair Closed Action Items page.
To see changes between current and last(or any earlier) versions of the action item list, click the history tab at the top of the page, select versions to compare and click compare command.
Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
Action Items 90-99
Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
91 High-Level Architecture Todd Open OPEN - High-Level Architecture ACM vs. DEC, alarm evidentiary data. Nov. 30, 2010: Change date to Open. September 20, 2011: Add to F2F agenda suggestions. December 13, 2011: Todd's current efforts will address this. Jan. 3, 2012: John Garguilo indicated Todd is starting to model this. He noted this will also relate to the OID structure. March 20, 2012: John Garguilo indicated that the DPI WG is working on a portion of this as are other WGs.
Action Items 100-109
Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments 104 Technical Framework Template 11/21/2012 OPEN October 2012 F2F: PCD to submit proposed improvements. E.g., Section 0 (IHE Overview). Completed this portion 10/31. Example: Last sentence - does not mention anything about devices - only information systems - do we as a domain propose adding "medical devices". IHE-PCD Group will flush out actual suggested language. Jan. 22,2013: John Garguilo to again request feedback. Feb. 12, 2013: John learned that the comments must be sent on a specific form. He will follow up.. 105 Spring F2F 11/28/2012 OPEN October 2012 F2F: Set date, location for spring F2F: Week of April 8, 15 suggested. Manny to poll membership. Nov. 13, 2012: Manny to ask Todd about West Health San Diego. Offer either week, with preference to the earlier week (Apr. 8). Feb. 12, 2013: Manny to ping those who indicated they can’t attend either days to ask if it is a preference or absolute.
106 Write Papers Promoting PCD co-chairs, Paul March 2013 OPEN Nov. 27, 2012: Write Papers Promoting PCD. 107 Profile Versioning John Garguilo, Monroe April 22, 2013 OPEN Dec. 18, 2012: Ken suggested that PCD may want to version the profiles. Mindray is considering how best to version their product in reference to the PCD message version. Discussion indicated this can be identified in the MSH and it would be useful to include this information in the Integration Statement. Monroe suggested that the NIST tool will need to accommodate multiple OIDs. Jan. 22, 2013: Place on F2F agenda. Change date to April 22. Add Monroe, John Garguilo. Feb. 12, 2013: Add to F2F. 108 Integration Statements Limited to Commercially Available April 15, 2013 OPEN Integration Statements Limited to Commercially Available, not to be posted otherwise. Jan. 22, 2013: Wait for response to the comment (see #104). Feb. 12, 2013: Monroe suggested that a different form of IS may be needed because the IS in its present form has been around a long time. Steve objected, saying no IS should be permitted unless it is available. John Garguilo asked if a similar situation occurs with certification and Monroe indicated that it would. Monroe will assume leadership. This is an issue identified in the comments noted in Item 104. Add to F2F. 109 OPEN
Action Items 110-119
Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
110 OPEN 111 OPEN 112 OPEN 113 OPEN 114 OPEN 115 OPEN
116 OPEN 117 OPEN 118 OPEN 119 OPEN
Tracking Related Items, 1-20
Number Item and Relationships Date Added to List Date Closed Description/Update 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19
20
Tracking Related Items, 21-40
Number Item and Relationships Date Added to List Date Closed Description/Update 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29
30
Links to PCD Cochairs Meetings Go to most recent/past meetings or next meeting Category: PCD Meeting
Patient Care Device home