Difference between revisions of "PCCTech Minutes 2013 05 01"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→EHDI) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===EHDI=== | ===EHDI=== | ||
*Led by Lisa Nelson | *Led by Lisa Nelson | ||
| − | ** Review and discussion of draft of state diagram proposed by Lisa and Mauro. Concerns about including quality measures in this profile. After much discussion of pros/cons, and the potential use of the existing quality EHDI profile that already exists suggestion made to have monitoring of workflow instead of flowing directly into the QM report. The monitoring can be monitoring record for multiple reporting needs and determine when the reporting needs to be done. The monitor would not be tied to EHDI. Put the workflow monitor in, do not say specifics about what it ia monitoring, then in August take the idea for the monitor to the proposal season. | + | ** Review and discussion of draft of state diagram proposed by Lisa and Mauro. Concerns about including quality measures in this profile. After much discussion of pros/cons, and the potential use of the existing quality EHDI profile that already exists suggestion made to have monitoring of workflow instead of flowing directly into the QM report. The monitoring can be monitoring record for multiple reporting needs and determine when the reporting needs to be done. The monitor would not be tied to EHDI. Put the workflow monitor in, do not say specifics about what it ia monitoring, then in August take the idea for the monitor to the proposal season. |
| + | ** Review of Volume 3 as drafted till now. Request made for eventTypes to be included on the state diagram for clarity. | ||
===Questions for ITI=== | ===Questions for ITI=== | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 1 May 2013
Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Keith Boone, Anne Diamond, Lisa Nelson, Denise Downing, George Cole, Emma Jones, Charles Rica, Landon Bain, Steve Moore, John Eichwald
Phone in attendees: Nichole, Stan Haavik, Terese Flinitzo, Xidong Deng, Anna Orlova
EHDI
- Led by Lisa Nelson
- Review and discussion of draft of state diagram proposed by Lisa and Mauro. Concerns about including quality measures in this profile. After much discussion of pros/cons, and the potential use of the existing quality EHDI profile that already exists suggestion made to have monitoring of workflow instead of flowing directly into the QM report. The monitoring can be monitoring record for multiple reporting needs and determine when the reporting needs to be done. The monitor would not be tied to EHDI. Put the workflow monitor in, do not say specifics about what it ia monitoring, then in August take the idea for the monitor to the proposal season.
- Review of Volume 3 as drafted till now. Request made for eventTypes to be included on the state diagram for clarity.
Questions for ITI
- Orders and referrals: order numbers, referral numbers, unique ID, identifying number. (order filler/ order placer numbers)
- Discussion from Order and Referral matching - EHDI - Open issue #1 1/23/2013 Binding to WorkflowDocument in and XDW profile, e.g. IBER XDSR? Where there is an Order Number known at the initiation of Workflow, where is the binding of that number into a WorkflowDocuent (task) specified.
- process for handling CPs (how does ITI handles CPs so we could be more efficient)
- We want to be able to handle CPs without changing documents......