ITI Planning Committee 2011/2012 Planning Cycle
Introduction
This WIKI page documents 2011/2012 Planning Cycle for the ITI Planning Domain, including the face-to-face meeting in October 2011 and the webinars that will lead up to that meeting.
Important Dates
Date | Event | Comments | Coordinates |
---|---|---|---|
6-Sep-11
11:59pm CDT |
Call for Proposals CLOSE | Submitted proposals can be found here. | |
22-Sep-11 | Webinar #1 - 9:00am-11:00 CDT | Agenda |
|
28-Sep-11 | Webinar #2 - 9:00am-11:00 CDT | CANCELLED | |
29-Sep-11 | Webinar #3 - 10:00am-12:00 CDT | CANCELLED | |
11-Oct-11
12-Oct-11 |
ITI Planning Committee f2f | See Below | Meeting Address:
|
Webinar Organization
Each webinar will be organized as follows (this will vary slightly depending upon how many proposals we will be reviewing:
- The two hour time allocation will be divided into 20-minute time-slots, with the remaining time for introductory remarks and follow-up discussion.
- Each 20-minute timeslot will be allocated to a profile/white paper proposal… the first 10 minutes will be taken up by a presentation by the proposal author, with the remaining 10 minutes reserved for discussion and any disposition (if required).
- Each 10-minute presentation will be comprised of a maximum of 5 Powerpoint slides, presenting the proposal concisely and completely. We have taken the liberty of supplying a presentation template that you may choose to use, and this can be found on the IHE ftp site here.
Webinar #1 AGENDA/Notes
Date | Time | Coordinates | Recording of the meeting | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
22-Sep-11 | 9:00-11:00 CDT | Join Webex(password "meeting")
|
Meeting recording | ||
# | Proposal | Author/Presenter | Description | Time | Comments |
Karen Witting, Claudio Saccavini : co-Chairs | Webinar Introduction, process | 9:00-9:10 | |||
ITI 1.0 | wiki Link | Horn, Rob | Critical & Important Results | 9:10-9:30 | 2 year work effort due to need for close coordination among many domains |
ITI 2.0 | FTP Link | Yutaka ANDO | Patient Encounter Tracking Query (PEQ) | 9:30-9:50 |
|
ITI 3.0 | FTP Link | Geoff Pascoe, Rob Horn, PCD | Configuration Management for Small Devices | 9:50-10:10 |
|
ITI 4.0 | FTP Link | Bill Majurski, Geoff Pascoe, Rob Horn | XD* Documentation | 10:10-10:30 | No significant discussion, work item well understood from prior years efforts |
ITI 5.0 | FTP Link | Keith Boone | XDS for Mobile Health | 10:30-10:45 |
|
Karen Witting, Claudio Saccavini : co-Chairs | Discussion, Next Steps | 10:45-11:00 | Agreed to cancel Webinars, next discussion at f2f |
ITI Planning Committee f2f - 11-12Oct11 AGENDA
The following agenda also includes the minutes from the meeting
TUESDAY October 11 - DAY 1
Location | Webex/Tcon |
---|---|
|
himss.webex.com |
Agenda # | Time/Description | Minutes/Notes |
---|---|---|
1. | Welcome 9:00 am - 9:30 CT | |
|
||
2. | ITI Capacity 9:30 - 10:00 CT | |
|
Current and ongoing work items identified
Agreed that capacity for additional 3-4 work items of mixed size is expected | |
3. | Process and evaluation criteria 10:00 - 10:30 CT | |
|
| |
4. | Advocacy - authors & representatives make a case for each proposal 10:30 - 12:00 CT | |
|
| |
LUNCH | 12:00 - 1:00 CT | |
5. | Advocacy (continued) 1:00 - 2:30 CT | |
|
| |
6. | General Discussion and preparation for evaluation 2:30 - 3:30 CT | |
|
Filled out criteria spreadsheet for work items previously discussed | |
7. | Break 3:30 - 4:00 CT | |
8. | Advocacy (continued) 4:00 - 4:45 CT | |
|
| |
9. | General Discussion and preparation for evaluation 4:45 - 5:15 CT | Completed criteria spreadsheet which includes the results of Criteria Based Ranking, which are:
|
ADJOURN | 5:15 pm CT |
WEDNESDAY October 12 - DAY 2
Location | Webex/Tcon |
---|---|
|
himss.webex.com |
Agenda # | Time/Description | Minutes/Notes |
---|---|---|
1. | Welcome, review of the day's plan 9:00 am - 9:15 am CT | |
2. | Discussion and decision on prioritized work item list 9:15-10:00 am CT | |
|
Ballot Voting: Final Result
| |
3. | Next Steps 10:00 - 10:30 am CT | |
|
| |
4. | Marketing and publicity planning 10:30 - 12:00 am CT | |
|
| |
LUNCH | 12:00 - 1:00 CT | |
4. | HIE White Paper 1:00-2:30 pm CT | |
|
| |
5. | Strategic planning and liason activities 2:30-3:00 pm CT | |
|
| |
6. | Wrap-up 3:00 - 3:30 pm CT | |
|
| |
ADJOURN | 3:30 pm CT |
ITI Planning Committee 2012 Final Text Review - March 19 2012
Joint ITI Planning/Technical Provisional Selection for Final Text
Agenda March 19
- Profiles to consider for Final Text
- Cross-Community Fetch (XCF)
- Cross-Community Patient Discovery (XCPD)
- Cross-Enterprise Document Workflow (XDW)
- Cross-Enterprise User Assertion - Attribute Extension (XUA++)
- Delayed Document Assembly
- Document-based Referral Request (DRR)
- Document Digital Signature (DSG)
- Document Encryption (DEN)
- Document Metadata Subscription (DSUB)
- Healthcare Provider Directory (HPD)
- Notification of Document Availability (NAV)
- On-Demand Documents
- Retrieve Form for Data Capture (RFD)
- Sharing Value Sets (SVS)
- Support for Metadata-Limited Document Sources
- XAD-PID Change Management
- XDS Metadata Update
- Input for TI Supplement Analysis: Connectathon participation & test tool notes
- profiles to consider for deprecation :
- Document-based referral (DRR) - replaced by XDW
- white papers to consider for archival: None Proposed
Minutes March 19
Summary of decisions
The following table is a summary of the detailed minutes which follow.
TI Supplements | FT/Remains TI/Deprecate | Explanation/Conditions | Owner | Final Decision - June 18, 2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|
XCF | TI | No Testing | ||
XCPD | TI | Patient Locator option not tested and may need revision, consider next year. | ||
XDW | TI | No NA Testing this year, consider next year | ||
XUA++ | FT |
|
1. Rob, 2. Lynn, 3. Rob | 1. CP 606 received minor editorial comment which is resolved.
2. Two of the three options were successfully tested. authorization consent was not tested, same option as subject of CP. Discussion of potentially breaking apart the two options which are ready and keep the remaining option in TI until testing. 3. Open issues in the supplement: XUA++003 - has been resolved in CP 606, XUA++004 - not resolved and need feedback on these issues Agreed to delay Final Text until the last option has been tested. Expect that testing to happen next year. |
Delayed Doc Assem | TI | Limited Testing | ||
DRR | Deprecate | Need deprecation process | co-chairs | Agreed to do the following
|
DSG | TI | CP to reformat, limited testing | ||
DEN | TI | No testing | ||
DSUB | TI | Several open CPs, consider next year | ||
HPD | TI | Open problems & extension not resolved | ||
NAV | TI |
|
1. Rob, 2. John | |
On-Demand Doc | TI | Waiting for further deployments | ||
RFD | FT | Committment to develop testing tools within 2012-2013 | Lynn | Lynn has a committment for completion this Fall. Approved to go to Final Text. |
SVS | TI | More testing needed | ||
Metadata-Limited Doc Source | TI | More testing needed | ||
XAD-PID Change Management | TI | More testing needed | ||
XDS Metadata Update | TI | Several open CPs |
Initial Review
Initial pass of each current TI Supplement, doing a quick assessment of likelihood of moving to Final Text
- Cross-Community Fetch (XCF)
- No testing so far : 2 signed up for NA but no tests run, and EU one vendor only
- Cross-Community Patient Discovery (XCPD)
- Options not tested but consider for FT (see below)
- Cross-Enterprise Document Workflow (XDW)
- No testing in NA, lots of vendors signed up for EU. Defer.
- Cross-Enterprise User Assertion - Attribute Extension (XUA++)
- Major CP on one option about to ballot. Could consider moving all but that troublesome option. Could advertise that CP to EU connectathon participation. consider for FT (see below)
- Delayed Document Assembly
- Defer
- Document-based Referral Request (DRR)
- Mark Sinke states forcare only signup for DRR but has decided to use XDW instead
- Discuss for deprecation.
- Document Digital Signature (DSG)
- Significant CP to reformat to conform as content profile
- People are actually using it (Manuel Metz)
- Registration but no testing
- Defer
- Document Encryption (DEN)
- Small signups but no testing
- Defer
- Document Metadata Subscription (DSUB)
- Good participation
- Couple of CPs need to resolved, currently too many variations
- Defer
- Healthcare Provider Directory (HPD)
- Several problems not resolved and proposed extension from US not resolved
- Open problems not submitted in CP process
- Karen will submit CPs
- Defer
- Notification of Document Availability (NAV)
- Hung up on content profile profile problems
- Far to complex of a solution for the problem
- Ultimately will need to deprecate and start over
- XML schema is too hard for the value you get out of it
- Part of the mobile health come up with a solution that makes this one easier in the future
- Add to critical results use cases
- Consider for deprecation (see below)
- On-Demand Documents
- Consider, testing is going well with few problems found (see below)
- Retrieve Form for Data Capture (RFD)
- consider, problems from last year resolved (see below)
- Sharing Value Sets (SVS)
- Defer
- Support for Metadata-Limited Document Sources
- Defer
- XAD-PID Change Management
- Defer
- XDS Metadata Update
- Defer
Detailed Review of selected profiles
Cross-Community Patient Discovery (XCPD)
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Yes
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Yes
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Concern expressed that Patient Locator Service is not well understood and not implemented.
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- No, X006 needs to be resolved before going final
- X021 can be closed
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- Yes
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- Not available. Consider for future years. Connectathon Project Manager responsibility.
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Yes
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- No
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- Yes but not all aspects, options are not supported by testing tools
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Yes
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- No - locator service still has concerns but is an option
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Yes
MOTION: proceed to final text under condition:
- note in final text associated with that option stating will consider further work on health data locator and may need to retire or revise this option
- Also need to resolve open issue X006
VOTE:
- IN FAVOR: 2
- ABSTAIN: 2
- OPPOSED: 6
DECISION: Leave in TI for one more year bacause of concern of option.
Cross-Enterprise User Assertion - Attribute Extension (XUA++)
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Two in the current ballot, conditional on CPs passing ballot
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Yes
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Yes
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- No but could find out if they are resolved
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- No but CP ballots expected to resolve them.
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- Not available. Consider for future years. Connectathon Project Manager responsibility.
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Yes
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- All options have been sucessfully been tested
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- No XUA IHE provided testing tools
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Yes, Yes
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Ues
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Not a profile, an option on an existing profile
MOTION: proceed to final text under condition:
- CPs pass ballot
- EU testing successful
- open issues resolved
VOTE:
- ABSTAIN: 2
- OPPOSED: 0
DECISION: Move to FT.
On-Demand Documents
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- No - extra data on the retrieve CP
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Yes
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Yes
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- CP 529 needs to be resolved. other open issue completed
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- Yes
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- Not available. Consider for future years. Connectathon Project Manager responsibility.
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Yes
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- No - persistence
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- None. Expected some day.
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Concerns here, US has adopted this but not deployed yet.
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Yes
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Not a profile, an option on an existing profile
MOTION: Defer consideration for Final Text
VOTE: All in favor
DECISION: Delay FT.
Retrieve Form for Data Capture (RFD)
Updates from review of criteria from last year:
- CP has been resolved
- Test tools did not get developed but it is in plan for Summer 2012
- Open Issues - George has reviewed and none are concerning and have been resolved or do not need resolution
Motion: approve conditional on test tool plans acceptable Opposed: None Abstentions: None Passed test plans - Lynn
MOTION: proceed to final text under condition:
- test tool plan
VOTE: All in favor
DECISION: Move to FT.
Document-based referral (DRR)
XDW has much more adoption than DRR ever generated and accomplishes the requirement.
MOTION: Deprecate this Profile
VOTE: All in Favor
- ABSTAIN: 2
- OPPOSED: 0
DECISION: Deprecate this profile. Co-chairs to identify process.
Notification of Document Availability (NAV)
Comments from the group:
- Prefer to fix rather than deprecate.
- Has serious problems but premature to deprecate it. Need to rework use cases and then decide how to act.
Motion: keep at TI encourage contributors to propose CPs to fix it.
closely related use cases coming out the critical results work - Rob will add to use cases in this white paper Could be a CP or new work item
Passed
Charles volunteers John to fix NAV MOTION: Keep at TI and encourage contributors to propose fixes
VOTE: All in Favor
DECISION: Keet at TI request Rob to add use case to Critical Results white paper and John to propose a way to fix the problems in the profile.
Review profiles in Final Text
None seemed appropriate for deprecation
Review white papers
None seemed appropriate for deprecation
Final Decision Plan
During May f2f meeting schedule a tcon in June to make final decision. (wait for EU connectathon results to make final decisions).
ITI Planning Committee 2012 Final Text Review - June 18 2012
Joint ITI Planning/Technical Final Selection for Final Text
Reviewed preliminary conditions
Notes in table within Summary of Decisions.
Assignment of editors
TI supplements (HPD, XCPD, XDW, DSUB, XUA++) due to Mary on 8/13. Due to committee 7/30.
TF Vol & RFD due to Mary 8/6. Due to committee 7/25.
- HPD - Karen, Lynn review
- XCPD - Karen, Lynn review
- XDW - Mauro, Lynn review
- DSUB - Rob, Moehrke review
- XUA++ - John (via Derrick), Lynn review
- RFD - George (via Derrick), Rob review
- Vol. 1 - Derrick, Moehrke review
- Vol. 2a - Jim, Derrick review
- Vol. 2b - Rob, Lynn review
- Vol. 2x - Jim, Derrick review
- Vol. 3 - Jim, Rob review