Difference between revisions of "Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group Tcon Minutes 2011-06-30"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
* Review proposed profile review process
 
* Review proposed profile review process
 
+
* Profile matrix can serve as iniitial planning tool
 +
:* Challenge to get compliance and review by all domains
 +
:* Modify profile proposal form to request which category new profiles fit into
 +
:* Define minimum requirements for domain performance to remain active
 +
::* Must have secretary
 +
::* Must use appropriate templates
 +
::* Must refer to strategic plan matrix
 +
:* Propose adding more detail to Domain Board Report: profile proposals, strategic planning document, etc.
 +
:* Develop context around category descriptions to describe what the desired outcome of developing and implementing each category will be
 +
:* '''Action Item:''' Review matrix with domains that have expressed dissatisfaction with how it fits their work: Mike Nusbaum will reach out to PCC; Chris Carr will work with QRPH
 +
:* '''Action Item:''' Work Group to review [[Cross-domain Strategic Planning Roadmap|"Roadmap"]] page to refine mission statement language and suggest language for defining purposes of each category of profiles.
  
 
* Next Call: July 28, 9:30-10:30 CT
 
* Next Call: July 28, 9:30-10:30 CT

Revision as of 10:45, 30 June 2011

Attendees

  • Chris Carr
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo
  • Mike Nusbaum
  • Kevin O'Donnell
  • Teri Sippel Schmidt
  • Karen Witting

Minutes

  • Reviewed charter of Work Group
  • Develop tools for strategic planning to gather input from domains
  • Shape input into coherent plan for Board review and feedback
  • Operationalize plan in Domain Coordination Committee and profile development and review process
  • Action Item: Chris Carr to draft Charter section of Work Group home page based on minutes from December and February strategic board discussion. Mike Nusbaum will review and refine.
  • Review proposed profile review process
  • Profile matrix can serve as iniitial planning tool
  • Challenge to get compliance and review by all domains
  • Modify profile proposal form to request which category new profiles fit into
  • Define minimum requirements for domain performance to remain active
  • Must have secretary
  • Must use appropriate templates
  • Must refer to strategic plan matrix
  • Propose adding more detail to Domain Board Report: profile proposals, strategic planning document, etc.
  • Develop context around category descriptions to describe what the desired outcome of developing and implementing each category will be
  • Action Item: Review matrix with domains that have expressed dissatisfaction with how it fits their work: Mike Nusbaum will reach out to PCC; Chris Carr will work with QRPH
  • Action Item: Work Group to review "Roadmap" page to refine mission statement language and suggest language for defining purposes of each category of profiles.
  • Next Call: July 28, 9:30-10:30 CT


Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group