Difference between revisions of "Card Tech Minutes 2016.10.26"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines. | :3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines. | ||
:4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day workflows. | :4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day workflows. | ||
| − | :5. PCC will further the detailed proposals that would be co-developed with the Cardiology TC. | + | :5. PCC will further the detailed proposals that would be co-developed with the Cardiology TC. Chris will attend the PCC face-to-face meeting to discuss the possibility of collaboration. |
| + | |||
| + | ''':Next Steps''' | ||
| + | :Nick will develop the detailed proposals for CRC and CIRC next week. Based on that we will be able to plan for the December meeting. | ||
[[Cardiology Technical Committee]] | [[Cardiology Technical Committee]] | ||
[[Category: Minutes]] | [[Category: Minutes]] | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 26 October 2016
Attendees
- Chris Melo, Philips, Co-chair
- Nick Gawrit, Heartbase, Co-chair
- Paul Dow, ACC, Secretary
- Dan Murphy, Epic
- Antje Schroeder, Siemens
- Charles Thomas, University of Washington
- Andrea Price, Indiana University Health
- Rebecca Baker, ACC
- Pamela Heller, ACC
Minutes
- Discussion Topics -
- 1. Introduction of new ACC Staff member Rebecca Baker - New Health IT associate to assist and develop projects.
- 2. Update on December 6, 2017, Clinical Guidelines meeting deferred until further notice - The decision was made internally for the inclusion of other groups to ensure understanding of the process and possible impacts to their workflow. This may expand the 2-day TC meeting back to 3-days.
- 3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines.
- 4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day workflows.
- 5. PCC will further the detailed proposals that would be co-developed with the Cardiology TC. Chris will attend the PCC face-to-face meeting to discuss the possibility of collaboration.
:Next Steps
- Nick will develop the detailed proposals for CRC and CIRC next week. Based on that we will be able to plan for the December meeting.