PCCTech Minutes 2015 07 22
Attendees
- In Room: Charles Perisot, Keith Boone, Angelique Cortez, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Denise Downing, Emma Jones Celina Roth, Sarah Willis,
- On Phone: Nagesh Bashyam (Dragon), Glen Marshall, Gyathri Jayawardena, Tone Southerland, Didi Davis
DAF
- Time line to get comments addressed - DAF is on IHE USA timeline to get published. Will need some help from PCC as far as getting published.
- Alignment with CareQuality
- DSe - a configuration service that has nto been fully defined.
- Roles - are like actors (business actors)
- Query Initiator/Responder = DAF Requestor/Responder
- Record Locator Service - this does not exist in DAF. This is a transaction in XCPD (patient locator)
- Section 3, 4 are policies so DAF does not have to align
- Section 5 - SLA's and Policy (not a technical requirement)
- Section 6 - "certification" policy. 6.2.1 - IHE integration statements
- Section 7 - Use Case is very similar to what DAF is trying to do. Use case is an implementation guide. There need to be a crosswalk from the use case to DAF implementation.
- Value sets for document metadata elements - CareQuality need to reference the DAF appendix
- DAF use of XCPD is implied but not explicit.
- Document Query and Retrieve is the most critical area.
- Keith comment was to both DAF and CareQuality to harmonize with each other
- Suggestion to use samilar terms
- CP to be submitted to DAF (authored by CareQuality). Need to review the careEquality guide and also need to align with the Commonwell quide.
- Outstanding question to IHE USA as to what happens to DAF when S&I ends.
- Discussion with Charles: what should be done and what should be postpone. There need to be a policy diagram to assist in explaining this work. .
- DAF need to address the metadata dispreptancy - does not align with VSOP that is in the body