Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-17
Revision as of 15:36, 17 September 2008 by Peter Mildenberger (talk | contribs)
Attendees
- David Clunie, MD - RadPharm
- Chris Lindop - GE (Co-chair)
- Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba (Co-chair)
- Paul Seifert - Agfa
- Peter Mildenberger, MD - ESR
- David Mendelson, MD - RSNA
- Jerold Wallis, MD - SNM
Minutes
Review of Brief Profile Proposals
- Estimate bandwidth of Technical Committee to review proposals
- Establish general strategy for development cycle: aggressive development or consolidation?
- Estimate effort level required with each proposal
- Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
- Establish strategic priorities within domain
- Devote entire development cycle to image-sharing issues?
- Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
- Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes
Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal
XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal
- Fits with image-sharing strategy
- Need to decide upon the scope of development
- XDS-I and image sharing across care sites is a politically hot topic
- Is it a problem IHE can advance a useful solution for and achieve adoption?
- Will updating XDS-I to XDS.b lead to dramatic improvement in adoption?
- Within a given PACS environment, Web access is a feature already typically available
- Add PHR use case to XDS-I?
- Address Web services-based transfer protocol for images in coordination with DICOM WG10 and ITI?
- Important to engage current adopters (eg, CHI and vendor adopters) to ensure that approach chosen is helpful and does not introduce incompatibility with adopted approaches: need to justify any incompatibilities introduced
- Canadian model is to establish centralized architecture for DI: regional PACS
- Need to assess current priority of addressing networked model vs. upgrading PDI solutions for removable media (driven by AMA, ACR concerns)
- Need to engage referring physicians in working on practical solutions for image exchange
- Action Item: Planning Committee to engage user adopters and gather their experience
- Action Item: Planning Committee to contact vendor adopters from Connectathon results db and request their input on approaches to update profile
- Action Item: Technical Committee to assess compatibility issues raised by upgrading to XDS.b
- Action Item: Planning Committee to flesh out and clarify use case to be addressed
- Action Item: Planning Committee to develop coordinated view of image sharing approaches
PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
- Fits with image-sharing strategy
Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal
- Fits with image-sharing strategy
Mammography Workstation Bidirectional Interface
- Invite Dr. Ellis and other clinical reps to convene Mammo Cmte to address this in current cycle
Scheduled Workflow II Phase 2 - Brief Proposal
- Consider whether it is possible to limit scope of work to moving from HL7 2.3 to 2.5 without other workflow improvement elements
- Minimum scope includes removing some options, providing identity of operator in PPS
- Defer to future cycles analysis of detailed order entry (requested by IHE-J and some US sites)
- Challenge will be allowing scope to expand in course of writing
- Chris Lindop takes responsibility for being lead author of changes
- Action Item: Chris Lindop to rewrite proposal with more limited scope
Cross Community Access for Imaging (XCA-I) - Brief Proposal
- Fits with image-sharing strategy
Image Management Enhancements - Brief Proposal
- Fits with image-sharing strategy
Vote on Proposals to go on Short List
- Action: Rad Plan Cochairs will send the Short List to Tech Cmte for feasibility and effort evaluation
Planning for RSNA
- Switch David Clunie in for Kevin O'Donnell on Tues, Dec. 2, 1:30-2:15
- Not necessary to have detailed content review session
- Schedule check-status call for Nov. 5, 11am CT