Radiation Exposure Monitoring

Radiation Exposure Managment (REM) facilitates the collection and distribution of information about estimated patient radiation exposure resulting from imaging procedures.

Summary

The REM Profile requires imaging modalities to export radiation exposure details in a standard format. Radiation reporting systems can either query for these "dose objects" periodically from an archive, or receive them directly from the modalities.

The profile also describes how radiation reporting systems can submit dose reports to centralized registries such as might be run by professional societies or national accreditation groups.

The radiation reporting system is expected to preform relevant dose QA analysis and produce related reports. The nature of such analysis and format of the reports is not considered a topic for standardization and is not covered in the profile.

Benefits

In the vast majority of medical procedures involving radiation, the potential benefit to the patients’ health far outweighs the potential risk, but the trade-off should not be overlooked. The technological mechanisms provided by this profile can facilitate a conscious evaluation of that trade-off.

Estimating radiation dose delivered to patients for medical purposes can facilitate a number of important activities:

For facilities exposing patients to radiation, monitoring such exposures can help ensure their policies, procedures and protocols are adequate and being followed appropriately.
For imaging physicians, monitoring such exposures can assist them in determining how changes in techniques and protocols impact radiation dose as well as image quality. This will enable them to maintain patient doses As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).
For patients’ physicians, overall data provided from monitoring such exposures can help them determine (in consultation with the imaging physician) if the benefit from the diagnostic information provided by an individual examination (or additional examinations) outweigh any small risk that may be associated with the imaging exam.
For medical physicists, having such post-procedure information available for individual patients may help them make essential patient-specific dose estimates for pregnant patients or patients exhibiting skin erythema as a result of long fluoroscopy examinations.
For professional societies and regulatory agencies, a collection of exposure data can be useful when setting or reviewing radiation dose related guidelines. Many such groups have expressed a desire to establish standards of practice or dose reference levels based on a quantitative understanding of current practice, however they have found it prohibitively difficult to collect such data.
For physicists and physicians, this kind of data can be vital to answering some of the fundamental scientific questions that remain and developing a more detailed understanding of the health impacts of radiation exposure and how it should be measured and managed.

Details

<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>

<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here. E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>

Granularity is at the level of irradiation events (define)
Mention the modalities covered
Mention the details recorded?
Based on DICOM SR
Expected that in most cases it will be stored in the study on the PACS
Registry submissions are de-identified
Submission uses Secure FTP

However, it is important to understand the technical and practical limitations of such dose monitoring and the reasons why the monitored values may not accurately provide the radiation dose administered to the patient: • The values provided by this tool are not “measurements” but only calculated estimates. • For computed tomography, “CTDI” is a dose estimate to a standard plastic phantom. Plastic is not human tissue. Therefore, the dose should not be represented as the dose received by the patient. • For planar or projection imaging, the recorded values may be exposure, skin dose or some other value that may not be patient’s body or organ dose. • It is inappropriate and inaccurate to add up dose estimates received by different parts of the body into a single cumulative value.

Despite such limitations, interest in monitoring radiation dose estimates is clearly expressed in such documents as the European directive Euratom 97/43 and the American College of Radiology Dose Whitepaper [1]. The profile is directly based on the work done by DICOM and the IEC to develop DICOM Dose objects appropriate for radiation dose monitoring. By profiling such automated methods, dose information can be collected and evaluated without imposing a significant administrative burden on staff otherwise occupied with caring for patients.

Systems Affected

Modalities may create and transmit dose objects.
PACS systems may store and manage dose objects.
RIS, PACS or standalone Reporting Workstations may retrieve, process and analyze dose objects.
Workstations may retrieve, display and possibly supplement dose objects.
National or regional repositories may receive dose objects submitted by reporting systems at participating sites.

Actors & Transactions:

<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>

Specification

Profile Status: Trial Implementation

Documents: Radiation Exposure Monitoring Supplement

Underlying Standards:

DICOM
Secure FTP

Radiation Exposure Monitoring

Contents

Summary

Benefits

Details

Systems Affected

Specification

See Also

Navigation menu

Search