Patient Registration Content

Public Comment Review call May 5, 2017

• Attendees: Kwekour, Amit Popat, Anna Orlova, Diana Warner, Elliot Silver, Mauro, Thomson
• Removed the AHIMA list from the appendix
• Used the recommended phrase
• Updated a diagram
• Page 14 - PID 7 segment - date time of birth - thru out the document use YYMMDD as referenced in the ISO standard. Recommend adding time zone - use IHE standard for consistent time. The change is needed on line 353
• Bottom of page 14 - weber state university and Middlebury library references - changed verbiage.
• Patient matching use case - SSN has dropped in popularity. email has increased in popularity as a good identifier. Thom shared article about a month ago. Also phone numbers are a good identifier. Thom will make a public comment - personal email and work email would be useful.
• ITI co-chairs
  • ITI does not know anything about this as a national extension.
  • ITI have not received any requests from IHE USA
  • AHIMA Wanted it to be a content profile in PCC. In February realized it fit as a national extension for PAM.
  • Currently working with Art-decor on a CDA document
  • If okay with PCC to submit for public comment?
  • Mauro - Not a good idea. Folks will see is as an ITI document published in PCC domain. Concerned not reaching the right audience for this.
  • Anna suggest adding additional tables for providers and place on an expedited schedule with ITI.
  • Mauro - usually National extension does not need public comment. Extension for Germany and France did not have public comment.
  • Amit - Ownership from IHE USA is different
  • Decision to make this work item a PCC White Paper and send it for public comment but later. Will vote on call tomorrow to make it a white paper. Then next cycle, will go thru ITI process for National Extension.
  • Will contact Mary for publication of the white paper for public comment.