Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10
Summary
Target: Prepare CP's for Ballot for April '10
Number of outstanding CPs:
- X Assigned CPs to work on
- CP-051 : Clarify Image Manager requirements in PGP profile
- CP-075 : Avoid using "system" for actors in transaction descriptions
- CP-082 : Dependency Table: clarification of dependency requirements, and better understanding
- CP-113 : No real Billing & Material Mgmt Option for OF actors
- CP-115 : Global Patient ID definition (equivalent to ITI-CP205)
- CP-125 : Contributing Equipment Sequence in Import Object Stored transaction is incomplete and does not agree with the DICOM 2007 Standard.
- CP-137 : IM/IA receives more or less instances than it expects as per MPPS
- CP-140 : Creator PSs not forwarded
- CP-141 : Clarify Semantics of R for Queries
- CP-144 : Clarify use of HL7 Original Acknowledgement Mode
- CP-145 : Let Export Selector specify a title and owner for the teaching file case document
- CP-151 : Clarify the attributes for distance measurements in Mammo Profile
- CP-152 : Section numbering in Transactions: Interaction Diagram
- CP-153 : Clarify term definitions for “order” and “procedure”, and add terms to the Glossary
- CP-160 : Clarify PDI Grouping
- CP-179 : Require Frame of Reference in tomographic NM Images
- CP-181 : Clarify Imaging Document Consumer rendering requirements
- CP-183 : Mapping of HL7 to DICOM when using different value representations/data types
- CP-184 : Provide Implementation Guidance for Provide and Register Transaction
- X Completed CPs to rework)
- CP-XXX : Name
- X New CPs to review/assign
- See "Incoming"
List of "non-trivial" CPs:
- CP-XXX : Title (Editor)
- Non-Trivial Issue
- CP-XXX : Title (Editor)
List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
- Harmonization work from the HL7 task force (when it becomes available) will affect the HL7 Implementation guide section(s) of the Framework.
List of other maintenance tasks:
- Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
- R2/RE Harmonization?
7. Risks
Any technical or political risks related to expected maintenance items?
9. Tech Cmte Evaluation
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
- x-y% (Somewhat elastic. Most aren't urgent/critical. Some could be wrapped up post-cycle in April/June.)
Responses to Issues:
- See italics in Risk and Open Issue sections
Candidate Editor:
- Chris Lindop/David Clunie