PCC Minutes - December 4th

Attending

Keith Boone, Audrey Dickinson, Laverne Palmer, Thom Kuhn, Larry McKnight, Anne Diamond, Marcia Veenstra, John Moehrke

Discussion

Query for Dynamic Clinical Data

Go forward with the profile, restrict scope to problems, allergies, vitals, labs, and demographics. Push on HL7 to address issues with missing queries for patient medications. Meet with HL7 Clinical Statements group to discuss our approach with queries in January.

Antepartum Care Summary

We prioritized ACOG forms in this order: C, A, B, D, E We would look at form C first. The PPHP profile seems to address the needs of Form A. The XD*-LAB profile would address labs. We need to find appropriate vocabulary for folders.

Research Data Capture Clarification

Not sure where to go with this. On one side, there is a very simple answer to this problem using secure e-mail with a link to a specific form. On the other hand, looking at the wider scope, to meet the needs of others using RFD, then we need to look at the broader set of use cases. One thought is to move this process into the white paper on case management.

One reason for this profile is to keep Clinical Trial vendors engaged in IHE processes. However, the Query for Dynamic Clinical Data might also keep them engaged.

Landen will update the profile. We will discuss this in more detail with ITI regarding use of other Web Services profiles, e.g. BPEL and Orchestration.