Difference between revisions of "Lab AP Conf Minutes 2015-Oct-13"
(Created page with "Back to ''' Anatomic Pathology''' Back to ''' IHE Laboratory Domain''' Back to '''Laboratory_Technical_Committee#Current_Meetings |...") |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
− | table> | + | <table> |
+ | <tbody> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td width="211">Carolyn Knapik</td> | <td width="211">Carolyn Knapik</td> | ||
Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
<td width="180">CAP</td> | <td width="180">CAP</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<strong>Regrets:</strong> Francois Macary | <strong>Regrets:</strong> Francois Macary |
Revision as of 11:42, 16 November 2015
Back to Anatomic Pathology
Back to IHE Laboratory Domain
Back to IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page
Attendees
<tbody> </tbody>Carolyn Knapik | CAP |
Alessandro Sulis | CRS4 |
Mary Kennedy | CAP |
Laurent Lardin | Beckman Coulter |
Benoit Denisselle | Beckman Coulter |
James Wulkan | Beckman Coulter |
Riki Merrick | APHL |
Ed Heierman | Abbott |
Jeffery Karp | CAP |
Raj Dash, MD FCAP | CAP |
Regrets: Francois Macary
Minutes
Agenda:
- APSR – need to wait till Christel is in attendance
- LAW CPs
- Raj – presentation sometime after 9:30 EDT
LAW CPs: (Ed)
James and Laurent provided feedback on LAW changes / clarifications -> Gazelle impact around use of Null and how to handle profile options
Gazelle detection of local codes – this should NOT cause an error
Test cases are not covering all the options, we are currently allowing in LAW – may need to update
Use of INV segment example – NEED to fix LAW
Ed is collecting all the input around the options – Laurent will review these – topic for the F2F LAW timeslot, need to be sure we have the option management worked out for the NA connectathon
Feedback from virtual connectathon:
No benefit to add the option qualifier into MSH-21 for actual implementations, but it is useful for schema selection in Gazelle during testing process – inconsistent naming of some profiles - Laurent will create slides for F2F to cover this topic
Beckman Coulter question about how to group INV segment
Ed will share his collection by end of day tomorrow
During F2F will also need to establish CP numbering for other CPs submitted by Dmytro, Johanna etc so we can then get that be formalized – make sure this set is prepped and incorporated in the NA connectathon testing
James and Ed will set up a meeting before end of this week, since James will not be at F2F
Migration to Art Décor for APSR / Creation of PSR = future project
Goal should be to have the knowledge represented in Art Décor, regardless of how it is exchanged – we do not want to lose the rules captured in APSR for the different situations
Would be nice to have Frank attend to give another overview / walk through of the tool – we did record his original presentation – Riki will check, if he could possibly be on for some of the time
For F2F meeting will set up the gotomeeting on CAP
Possibility of merging SDC, XD-Lab, and PSR (APSR): (Raj)
Take holistic view at structured reporting as it exists in IHE across domains
There are many profiles that are not specifically geared towards lab, but have basic functions pretty well defined
Not a single profile that covers ALL workflow yet, but where to go to get vendor participation and adoption across countries
One of the profiles that is aligned
SDC presentation – focus was research due to funding involved
ONC, FDA, AHRQ are major sponsors
Number of different forms might be finite / manageable number to provide
CAP electronic Cancer Checklist (eCC) – 80 forms – disease type specific as well as step in the care process
eCC was involved in connectathon – get an insight of what was discovered and share that in F2F
SDC uses both RDF as well as FHIR for data exchange
We could fill in gaps for AP and Lab data elements currently missing in SDC
Presentation layer = clinical reporting is the largest gap in SDC
Data element behavior / business requirements
Raj is researching more what is already available in Art-Décor – see art-décor.org
Christel has done some requirements gathering completed on what is needed for microscopy exchange to existing imaging standards
SDC is housed in AHRQ domain at IHE – need to figure out how do we work with them
What should we do about use of SNOMED CT (SCT) in IHE profiles –
DCC has request to domains to create enumerated lists of SCT codes used - would be better to allow identification of a hierarchy and not use the attributes to fully define the concepts – maybe use back channels and get the tech folks to see the benefit of supporting adoption without much of the risk
Other Topics?
- F2F: Mary will send list of attendees to Naomi
Next call 11/10/2015 – but hopefully folks will join us at F2F in Tokyo next week, either in person or via phone
Call adjourned 10:15 AM EDT