ITI Planning Committee 2015/2016 Meetings: Difference between revisions
| Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
| Esther Peelen, Vincent van Pelt, Tie Tjee, Erik Zwarter, Amanda deLaroque, Robert Breas | | Esther Peelen, Vincent van Pelt, Tie Tjee, Erik Zwarter, Amanda deLaroque, Robert Breas | ||
| [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr14-2016-2017/Planning_Cmte/BriefProfileProposals/ presentation link TBD] | | [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr14-2016-2017/Planning_Cmte/BriefProfileProposals/ presentation link TBD] | ||
Discussion: Determined need; Seems to be solved by a PIX manager. Suggested that ITI | Discussion: Determined need; Seems to be solved by a PIX manager. Suggested that ITI address this use case to a PIX manager profile, and seems like the "content" side of this proposal is better suited to a domain like Pharmacy. Defined UDI as a globally unique ID, has a manufacturer tracing, FDA regulated, and is becoming an international identifier. Parsing is not a problem. Pharmacy domain has defined the workflow. Supply is cross domain. Proposal was to refer to Pharmacy, then Pharmacy will work as far as they can, and then will come back to ITI. Pharmacy has skill sets for this use case (bar coding). Wide variety of bar coding standards. Initial ranking: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 10:15-10:45 CT | | 10:15-10:45 CT | ||
Revision as of 10:09, 22 October 2015
Introduction
This WIKI page documents the activities of the ITI Planning Committee during the 2015/2016 committee year (August 2015 - July 2016). These activities include:
- Call for Proposals : August-October
- Review and selection of Proposals : October-December
- Updates/Additions to Educational Materials/White Papers/Etc. : December-July
Proposal Webinars
Webinar Organization
Each webinar will be organized as follows (this will vary slightly depending upon how many proposals we will be reviewing:
- Each webinar will be divided into 20-minute time-slots, with the remaining time for introductory remarks and follow-up discussion.
- Each 20-minute time slot will be allocated to a profile/white paper proposal… the first 10 minutes will be taken up by a presentation by the proposal author, with the remaining 10 minutes reserved for discussion and any disposition (if required).
- Each 10-minute presentation will be comprised of a maximum of 5 Powerpoint slides, presenting the proposal problem statement concisely and completely.
Webinar 1
Webinar #1 was not needed and has been canceled. Please see below for the schedule for the remaining webinars.
Webinar 2
Webinar #2 was not needed and has been canceled. Please see below for the schedule for the remaining webinars.
Webinar 3
All times are Central Time
| Date | Time | Coordinates | Recording of the meeting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-Oct-15 | 12:00pm-2:00pm CDT | Join Webex(password "meeting") | Download recording of Session #3 |
| Time | Proposal | Author/Presenter | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12:00pm-12:10pm | Webinar Introduction, process | Daniel Berezeanu, Eric Heflin : Co-Chairs | The goal for this series of webinars is to just explain and socialize the problem. The goals is NOT for the presenter to talk about the solution. And the goals is NOT for the ITI PC to prioritize or select which brief proposals move forward. Presenters should be prepared to present their brief proposal papers, or a power point with the same basic concepts. All webinars will be recorded and publicly posted. All ITI PC members are expected to review the webinars (live or via the recordings) prior to the F2F meetings. |
| 12:10pm-12:30pm | Enhanced Patient Privacy Consents | Tarik Idris, John Moehrke, Frank Oemig, Jörg Caumanns | 1-Facility specific consent
2-Consent for an episode of care 3-Provider blacklist, document author/source, document metadata, roles, Xid There seems to be some overlap with existing standards. A full standards assessment will be required once the profile work begins. Use of stylesheets, what will be the source of the policy statements, how are you planning to address specific policies. There could be many different sources of policies, but there are different approaches that could be applied including a central approach We are looking to create a portion in consent within probably PBBC, which they can use the meaning behind the modifications to core consent. Will this be applied to nation, state legislations within a determined structure? We can certainly within IHE have specific reach outs but normal public comment mechanism should be minimally acceptable. |
| 12:30pm-12:50pm | Re-documentation of Document Sharing Profiles | Karen Witting | What is the positive impact of this work on IHE?
Phase 1 most important, phase 2 more focused, the impact would be about the same as phase 2 and will provide significant impact with minimal work effort. The clarification and re-documentation of the existing standards provides ease of use and implementation without changes to any conformance criteria. How was the decision on what order the profiles to re-document? The work group decided to cover the provide, register and retrieve transactions and would be complete and the Query transaction in a later phase. |
| 12:50pm-1:10pm | HIT Standards for HIM Practices: Implementable White Paper Proposal | Harry Rhodes, Anna Orlova, Diana Warner | Can this effort be internationalized? Yes, we are already working internationally with collaborators.
Impact, original WP received 149 comments external to ITI, HIM vendors and implementers are showing much interest in the work IHE is doing. |
| 1:10pm-1:20pm | Discussion, Next Steps | Co-Chairs | Next steps: 1) more Brief Proposal webinars scheduled (please see below on this page for the details), 2) you should listen to all webinars prior to the October face-to-face meetings, 3) in Oct f2f meetings the ITI Planning Committee we will dive into these more deeply and assess against criteria in the spreadsheet (fit, value, effort, etc.), 4) vote on which move forward to ITI TC for their assessment. Also a reminder: All presenters should send their presentations so they can be posted on the public ftp site. |
Webinar 4
All times are Central Time. This call will be recorded and publicly posted.
| Date | Time | Coordinates | Recording of the meeting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-Oct-19 | 3:30pm-5:30pm CDT | Join Webex(password "meeting") | Download recording of Session #4 |
| Time | Proposal | Author/Presenter | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3:30pm-3:40pm | Webinar Introduction, process | Eric Heflin, Daniel Berezeanu : Co-Chairs | Re-iterated message from prior call to focus on the problem, not the solution. |
| 3:40pm-4:00pm | Maintenance of Profiles Published in 2015 and earlier | Lynn Felhofer | Q: What is the size of the CP work? A: Will be available in Nov and is on Wiki's now. Probably a medium or large work item, but it depends on people doing the work and which CPs are selected for emphasis in the coming year if this proposal is selected. Q: Is this a heads up on normal governance or a specific ask? A: Goal was to help the Planning Committee better determine capacity and specifically take maintenance into account when prioritizing Tech Cmte work in the coming year. |
| 4:00pm-4:20pm | RESTful DSUB | Rob Horn | Q: What is the DSTU timeline? A: Probably DSTU3 will be several years out. Q: Would this be a white paper or a profile? A: We would decide together, but the editor is proposing a white paper this year, and then a profile next year. Q: Why not wait for a few years when HL7 is done? A: Need to accommodate for software development life cycles and lead time. Q: Is DSUB used widely today? A: Hard to assess. Perhaps we could determine from IHE Product Registry. Q: Can we clarify the use case? A: Yes. Q: Why do mobile devices need a notification pattern? A: "Tell me when this is ready." type of use case. Perhaps contrast polling vs. push notifications. |
| 4:20pm-4:40pm | Uniformal barcode processing for patient safety and efficiency Presentation | Erik Zwarter, Vincent van Pelt | Q: What is the interoperability problem? A: Each bar code used in the clinical care environment is different and not interoperable. Q: In pharmacy a white paper has been done with a focus on the same problem. How is this different? A: Its not different except that the proposal is designed to work in any domain, not just pharmacy. Q: Determined it was not needed for pharmacy. What is the differentiating point? Q: Would you expect the data to be captured in a structured manner? A: Acknowledged. Will have to provide more information. Q: Suggested coordination with Patient Care Devices domain and Pharmacy domain. ITI may not have as much impact as it would if driven by Pharmacy. |
| 4:40pm-4:50pm | HPD Updates/USA National Extension Presentation | Eric Heflin | Q: Can this be broken into three proposals? A: Yes. Q: Can the CP aspects be combined with Lynn's proposal? A: Will consider. Seems like a good idea. Comment: USA national extension should not hold Final Text promotion. Q: Can a use case be defined that better discerns the reason to implement a FHIR/RESTful approach? A: Will consider. |
| 4:50pm-5:00pm | Discussion, Next Steps | Co-Chairs | Review agenda face-to-face meeting on Thursday 2015-10-22. |
Webinar 5
Webinar #5 was not needed and has been canceled. Please see above for the schedule for the remaining webinars.
F2F Meeting
The following agenda is a draft and may be adjusted based on needs of the meeting
Thursday October 22 2015 - In-person Meeting Day 1 (Decisional)
NOTE: THIS AGENDA WILL BE SUBJECT TO CONTINUOUS REVISION; IT WILL BE LIKELY REVISED UP TO AND DURING THE MEETING.
| Location | Webex/Tcon |
|---|---|
|
Join webex Meeting number: 928 183 704
Meeting Password: "Meeting1" (no quotes) To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the meeting, or call the number below and enter the access code. Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 Access code:928 183 704 Global call-in numbers: https://himss.webex.com/himss/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=403149227&tollFree=1 Toll-free dialing restrictions: http://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf |
| Time | Description | Presenter | Minutes/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8:45-9:00 CT | Welcome | ||
|
Co-Chairs, Domain Sponsors | ||
| 9:00-9:45 CT | ITI Capacity and Evaluation Criteria | ||
|
ITI co-chairs | Goal: Decide how many votes each organization will get. Decide on approximate number of proposals to forward on to ITI TC. Evaluate each proposal at end of each presentation (while it is fresh). Decide on physical voting logistics (google spreadsheet, flip chart, other.)
Outcome: Decision: "Focus on value for today, not solution, size will only be a very rough estimate. TC will determine size/effort. Each organization gets 51%+ of the number of proposals (5 points for 8 proposals, 7 proposals would result in 4 points). Planning committee work items are in a different category. Items can be rejected due to wrong committee. Items identified as "Must Do" will be excluded from the straw poll." | |
| 9:45-10:15 CT | Advocacy Uniformal barcode processing for patient safety and efficiency | Esther Peelen, Vincent van Pelt, Tie Tjee, Erik Zwarter, Amanda deLaroque, Robert Breas | presentation link TBD
Discussion: Determined need; Seems to be solved by a PIX manager. Suggested that ITI address this use case to a PIX manager profile, and seems like the "content" side of this proposal is better suited to a domain like Pharmacy. Defined UDI as a globally unique ID, has a manufacturer tracing, FDA regulated, and is becoming an international identifier. Parsing is not a problem. Pharmacy domain has defined the workflow. Supply is cross domain. Proposal was to refer to Pharmacy, then Pharmacy will work as far as they can, and then will come back to ITI. Pharmacy has skill sets for this use case (bar coding). Wide variety of bar coding standards. Initial ranking: |
| 10:15-10:45 CT | Advocacy Maintenance of Profiles Published in 2015 and earlier | Lynn Felhofer | Presentation WhoHasWhatCPs Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 10:45-11:00 CT | Break | ||
| 11:00-11:30 CT | Advocacy Enhanced Patient Privacy Consents | Tarik Idris, John Moehrke, Frank Oemig, Jörg Caumanns | presentation TBD Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 11:30-12:00 CT | Advocacy Re-documentation of Document Sharing Profiles | Karen Witting | Presentation TBD Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 12:00-12:30 CT | Lunch Break | ||
| 12:30-13:00 CT | Advocacy RESTful DSUB | Rob Horn | presentation TBD Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 13:00-13:30 CT | Advocacy HPD Updates and USA National Extension Proposal | Eric Heflin | Presentation Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 13:30-14:00 CT | Advocacy HIT Standards for HIM Practices: Implementable White Paper Proposal | Harry Rhodes, Anna Orlova, Diana Warner | Presentation TBD Discussion TBD. Initial ranking: TBD points. |
| 13:45-14:00 CT | Break | ||
| 14:00-15:00 CT | General Discussion and preparation for evaluation | ITI Planning co-chairs | Initial assessment. |
| 15:00-16:00 CT | General Discussion and preparation for evaluation | ITI Planning co-chairs | Review of initial assessment. Discussion about which on-going work items will be sent to ITI TC. Discussion about combining proposals, reminders / decision about voting procedures, capacity reminder for ITI, and review of tomorrow's agenda (process used to develop a prioritized work item list). Some items may be work items for the ITI Planning Committee. |
| 16:00-17:30 CT | Educational Activities | ITI Planning co-chairs | Review of current gaps in the IHE ITI educational materials. Decide on items the ITI PC will work on this cycle in terms of webinars, presentations, and other educational materials. Note that it may be time for a refresh of all educational materials at this point, plus new materials for updated work from the last two cycles in particular. Current educational materials from ITI PC can be found here: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Current_Published_ITI_Educational_Materials |
| 17:30 pm CT | ADJOURN |
Friday October 23, 2015 - In-person Meeting Day 2 (Decisional)
NOTE: THIS AGENDA WILL BE SUBJECT TO CONTINUOUS REVISION; IT WILL BE LIKELY REVISED UP TO AND DURING THE MEETING. As of 2015-10-19 it is incomplete for all items after the ballot. We will try to wrap up the meeting by 3pm or earlier to accommodate travel schedules.
| Location | Webex/Tcon |
|---|---|
|
Join webex Meeting number: 928 522 664
Meeting Password: "Meeting1" (no quotes) To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the meeting, or call the number below and enter the access code. Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 Access code:928 522 664 Global call-in numbers: https://himss.webex.com/himss/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=402487097&tollFree=1 Toll-free dialing restrictions: http://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf |
| Time | Description | Presenter | Minutes/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8:30-8:45 CT | Welcome, review of the day's plan | ||
| 8:30-11:30 CT | Discussion and Voting on prioritized work item list | Vote for Profiles Here: TBD | |
|
Each organization will get # votes. Results will be tallied in the eval spreadsheet. Link | ||
| 12:15-13:00 CT | LUNCH | ||
| 13:00-14:00 |
|
| |
Suggestions for improvement for next year
|
Review of the process/suggestions for improvements | ||
| 14:15-14:30 pm CT | Marketing and publicity planning | ||
|
|
Potential Additions to be considered for this year | |
| 14:30-14:45 CT | Consider suggestions for future ITI Planning Committee work | ||
|
|
||
| 3:45 - 4:00 pm CT | Wrap-up | ||
|
|
||
| 4:00 pm CT | ADJOURN |