Lab Conf Minutes 10February2015: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cknapik (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cknapik (talk | contribs)
Line 61: Line 61:
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Had extended the voting period (HL7 WGM and IHE Connectahon) voting closed last Friday 2//6/2015</li>
<li>Had extended the voting period (HL7 WGM and IHE Connectahon) voting closed last Friday 2//6/2015</li>
<li>Total of 8 votes – all affirmative (need to know, if that is enough votes – think that means we passed but Carolyn to check)</li>
<li>Total of 8 votes – all affirmative (need to know, if that is enough votes – think that means we passed but Carolyn to verify)</li>
<li>Question on the LAW Profile CP changes- Ed updated draft version based on those changes:</li>
<li>Question on the LAW Profile CP changes- Ed updated draft version based on those changes:
<li>Once this proposal is finalized, we can then send off the ballot</li>
<li>Reviewing the spreadsheet – need to add the CP Laurent sent regarding use of OBX-4 / Micro updates: add number 239 and add to the wiki and FTP site – Riki to do</li>
<li>Once the final changes have been made, need to send updated spreadsheet to Carolyn and let her know we are ready to send the email</li>
<li>Can add acknowledgement Riki needs and acknowledge IICC and ASIP Sante in parallel with the ballot – no CP needed, so draft the page</li>
</ul>
<strong>Other TF related CPs</strong>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Riki to collect more before the next call</li>
<li>CP233: For patient demographic option – analyzer manager should not send the elements in this profile, if the analyzer is not supporting that profile. Would that be an error, or can analyzer just ignore the extra data?
<ul>
<li>Undelete the footnote and change to The Analyzer Manager should send enhanced information ONLY when Analyzer supports the option – We have a statement already in the text in Volume 2. – May be repeat that statement before the table in addition to the footnote – it is just guidance – this does not change the intent of the CP – not a substantive change</li>
 
<strong>Next steps for LAW (Ed)</strong>
<ul>
<li>Updated draft version with CP-233 and CP-236 and then all should be completed</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<strong>Update on IHE-HL7 WG formation</strong>
<strong>Update on IHE-HL7 WG formation</strong>

Revision as of 15:08, 10 February 2015

Back to IHE Laboratory Domain

Back to IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page


Attendee's

Name Organization
Francois Macary (Technical Co-chair) ASIP Santé
Riki Merrick (Planning Co-Chair) Vernetzt, LLC
Carolyn Knapik (Secretary) CAP
James Wulkan Beckman Coulter
Allesandro Sulis CRS4
Dmytro Rud Roche
Jim Harrison University of Virginia
Joanna Selinsky Beckman Coulter
Daniel Moncusi Systelab Technologies
Ed Heierman Abbott

Minutes

Agenda Reviewed (Francois)

Update from US connectathon 2015 – no update

Update on the ballot for the LAW profile (Carolyn Knapik)

  • Had extended the voting period (HL7 WGM and IHE Connectahon) voting closed last Friday 2//6/2015
  • Total of 8 votes – all affirmative (need to know, if that is enough votes – think that means we passed but Carolyn to verify)
  • Question on the LAW Profile CP changes- Ed updated draft version based on those changes:
    • CP233: For patient demographic option – analyzer manager should not send the elements in this profile, if the analyzer is not supporting that profile. Would that be an error, or can analyzer just ignore the extra data?
      • Undelete the footnote and change to The Analyzer Manager should send enhanced information ONLY when Analyzer supports the option – We have a statement already in the text in Volume 2. – May be repeat that statement before the table in addition to the footnote – it is just guidance – this does not change the intent of the CP – not a substantive change
      • Next steps for LAW (Ed)
        • Updated draft version with CP-233 and CP-236 and then all should be completed

        Update on IHE-HL7 WG formation

        • Formal formation consideration

        Update on LCC - need to verify publication date - Mary Jungers was wondering if it could be moved 1 month forward, to have it be out of the comment period in time for JAN connectathon registration – still in HL7 modification step of the progress – intent was to have the CPs written in February – they will now have to go into v2.10 – hard to predict, that we can make the actual dates, but we can shorten the comment period for IHE in case we do make the deadline. Will have to push the publication into Fall, so that may delay the connectathon presentation also, but not an issue.

        ACTION: Riki to let Mary Junger know and update the publication calendar.

        Technical difficulties prevent screen sharing

        Update on LDA project (John Hopson)

        • Phase I - Point-in-Space Sample Presentation