PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2013-04-02 Webex: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m →Participants: enter participants |
m →Discussion: enter summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: No changes were made to the agenda. | : No changes were made to the agenda. | ||
: Discussion Summary from last meetings were | : Discussion Summary from last meetings were referred to (PIV Test Reviews). | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| '''2014 N A Connectathon: Review of PIV Tests''' <br>- Manny | | '''2014 N A Connectathon: Review of PIV Tests''' <br>- Manny | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
DEC Tests Discussion April 2, 2013: | DEC Tests Discussion April 2, 2013: | ||
:- Paul led the discussion. He began by reviewing the list of suggested changes (Word document). | |||
:- Richard suggested that rather than list the acronyms we provide a link to that portion of the TF. | |||
:- Paul suggested that safety concerns, references to JC, etc. could be helpful in planning tests and Showcase demonstrations. | |||
:- There was consensus that clarification is needed to make it clear that gateways, monitors, systems that support multiple device types will test at least two parameters from at least two types of devices. | |||
:- There was a consensus that point of care devices should include error/issue codes (as the Pump WG and POI WG have done). Manny to add to the F2F agenda. | |||
:- Paul noted that the WCM and POI option tests need to be extended. Manny provided background, indicating that tests for 2013 were intentionally superficial intended to gain some experience. | |||
:- Richard recommended that, in the future, multiple device types need to be tested simultaneously. E.g., devices streaming data may have multiple modes of data sharing for multiple purposes and receivers. One requirement may be for “average data” another for the raw data. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 65: | Line 71: | ||
| '''Next Meetings''' <br>- Manny | | '''Next Meetings''' <br>- Manny | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
:- Next week’s meeting will review the DEC tests. | :- Next week’s meeting will continue review the DEC tests, and potential extensions to the POI and WCM tests. | ||
:- Next week to extend POI, WCM. Will invite Ioana, Ken to join the discussion. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 2 April 2013
PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting 2013-2014 Cycle
Action Items
You can find the Action Items at PCD-Connectathon&Showcase-ActionItemsCycle8-2013-2014
Agenda
You can find the agenda at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_WG_2012-13
This meeting was ______ recorded,
Participants
Sue-fen Cuti (Careeverywhere), Bikram Day (Capsule), Al Engelbert (Protolink), Robert Flanders (GE), John Garguilo (NIST), Bob Gold (Philips), Richard Lane (West Health), Jeff McGeath (Accent on Integration), Monroe Pattillo (Practical Health Interoperability), Paul Sherman (Sherman Engineering), Manny Furst
Discussion
Item3 Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- MannyStatus/Discussion: Placeholder
- No changes were made to the agenda.
- Discussion Summary from last meetings were referred to (PIV Test Reviews).
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
2 2014 N A Connectathon: Review of PIV Tests
- MannyStatus/Discussion: DEC Tests Discussion April 2, 2013:
- - Paul led the discussion. He began by reviewing the list of suggested changes (Word document).
- - Richard suggested that rather than list the acronyms we provide a link to that portion of the TF.
- - Paul suggested that safety concerns, references to JC, etc. could be helpful in planning tests and Showcase demonstrations.
- - There was consensus that clarification is needed to make it clear that gateways, monitors, systems that support multiple device types will test at least two parameters from at least two types of devices.
- - There was a consensus that point of care devices should include error/issue codes (as the Pump WG and POI WG have done). Manny to add to the F2F agenda.
- - Paul noted that the WCM and POI option tests need to be extended. Manny provided background, indicating that tests for 2013 were intentionally superficial intended to gain some experience.
- - Richard recommended that, in the future, multiple device types need to be tested simultaneously. E.g., devices streaming data may have multiple modes of data sharing for multiple purposes and receivers. One requirement may be for “average data” another for the raw data.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 2013 AAMI Demonstration
- MannyStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 Next Meetings
- MannyStatus/Discussion: - - Next week’s meeting will continue review the DEC tests, and potential extensions to the POI and WCM tests.
- - Next week to extend POI, WCM. Will invite Ioana, Ken to join the discussion.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
Return to main WG page which has links to individual meeting pages
Return to main PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG page: PCD_Connectathon&Showcase_WG_2012-13