QRPH Tech Minutes 2011-06-03: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Lisa Nelson | * Lisa Nelson | ||
* Nichole Drye-Mayo | * Nichole Drye-Mayo | ||
==Attendees== | |||
* Amit Popat | |||
* Didi Davis | |||
* John Eichwald | |||
* Lisa Nelson | |||
* Lori Fourquet | |||
* Mark Arratoon | |||
* Nitin Kunte | |||
* Michelle Williamson | |||
* Wendy Blumenthal | |||
* Eddy Rospide | |||
* Wendy Scharber | |||
* Xidong | |||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 32: | ||
::* QRPH Physician Reporting Public Health-Cancer Registry (PRPH-Ca) | ::* QRPH Physician Reporting Public Health-Cancer Registry (PRPH-Ca) | ||
::* QRPH Mother and Child Health (MCH) | ::* QRPH Mother and Child Health (MCH) | ||
::* QRPH Retrieve Process for Execution (RPE) | ::* QRPH Retrieve Process for Execution (RPE) | ||
::* | :::* What do we want to do with this as a committee? Means 2 different things depending on who you ask (implementor - research; committee - more generic) - propose splitting into two profiles. Name new RPE something that labels it more correctly - like process execution and management (PEM); in the future if we see that PEM has become robust enough, we can go back and recommend using PEM. Almost but not fully there. Comments - process questions. If we have CP process what does it mean if we don't follow up with it? | ||
::* QRPH Public Health Reporting (PH-rpt) | ::* QRPH Public Health Reporting (PH-rpt) | ||
:::* | |||
:* Final Vote on profiles moving to Public Comment | :* Final Vote on profiles moving to Public Comment | ||
:* Those voted and approved must meet the 3pm CDT June 3 submission deadline to Didi Davis. Even if approved in final vote this morning, if not submitted by that deadline, will not move forward until the next cycle. | :* Those voted and approved must meet the 3pm CDT June 3 submission deadline to Didi Davis. Even if approved in final vote this morning, if not submitted by that deadline, will not move forward until the next cycle. | ||
Revision as of 10:05, 3 June 2011
Attendees
- Amit Popat
- Didi Davis
- John Eichwald
- Lori Fourquet
- Nitin Kunte
- Wendy Blumenthal
- Xidong
- Lisa Nelson
- Nichole Drye-Mayo
Attendees
- Amit Popat
- Didi Davis
- John Eichwald
- Lisa Nelson
- Lori Fourquet
- Mark Arratoon
- Nitin Kunte
- Michelle Williamson
- Wendy Blumenthal
- Eddy Rospide
- Wendy Scharber
- Xidong
Minutes
- Status of Profiles
- QRPH Early Hearing-loss Care Plan (EHCP)
- QRPH Quality Measure Execution (QME-EH) - dependent on HL7 QRDA standard
- QRPH Quality Measure Definition (QMD-EH) – dependent on HL7 HQMF standard
- QRPH Physician Reporting Public Health-Cancer Registry (PRPH-Ca)
- QRPH Mother and Child Health (MCH)
- QRPH Retrieve Process for Execution (RPE)
- What do we want to do with this as a committee? Means 2 different things depending on who you ask (implementor - research; committee - more generic) - propose splitting into two profiles. Name new RPE something that labels it more correctly - like process execution and management (PEM); in the future if we see that PEM has become robust enough, we can go back and recommend using PEM. Almost but not fully there. Comments - process questions. If we have CP process what does it mean if we don't follow up with it?
- QRPH Public Health Reporting (PH-rpt)
- Final Vote on profiles moving to Public Comment
- Those voted and approved must meet the 3pm CDT June 3 submission deadline to Didi Davis. Even if approved in final vote this morning, if not submitted by that deadline, will not move forward until the next cycle.