IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2010-08-31

Attendees

• Juergen Brandstaetter - Pharmacy Plan/Tech
• Rick Butler - Eye Care
• Chris Carr - RSNA
• Tom Dolan - Cardio Tech
• Laura Heerman - PCC Tech
• Yvonne Horton - HIMSS
• Mary Jungers - Document Specialist
• Lisa Nelson - Tech Proj Mgr (QRPH)
• Mike Nusbaum - ITI Plan
• Kevin O'Donnell - Rad Plan
• Antje Schroeder - Cardio Tech

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

2. Review of Minutes

• August 17 Minutes

3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page

4. Review Action Items List

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

• Pharmacy Domain

• Meeting next week to work on 5 draft profile supplements (on ftp site in Pharmacy folder)
• Goal is to have public comment versions of supplements published by mid- to late September
• Hope to have available for testing at IHE-E Connectathon in Pisa

• Cardiology

• ITI

• Lab

• Face-to-face in September to develop supplements

• PCC

• Radiology

Domain Coordination Issues

• Documentation Workgroup

• Tcon on 8/24: Minutes

• Document publication team will investigate implementing improved document cross-linking capabilities

• Karen Witting investigating pdf Open Parameters to see whether there is a simple protocol for addressing individual pdf pages
• Mike Nusbaum looking into add on that allows creation of bookmarks within pdfs

• Chris Carr and Mary Jungers to improve author documentation on Wiki and Webinar presentation on authoring process for profile authors

• HL7 Task Force

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

• Document publication status update

• All PCC and QRPH documents except EHDI and MCH ready for publication

• Document review process and quality criteria

• Quality review by Technical Project Managers is vital
• Ideally it should be a simultaneous part of the committee review process
• Review committee publication dates and see if they can be staggered
• Dependencies among profiles under development simultaneously causes special complications; take interpendencies into account in the planning of development cycle
• Technical Project Managers should be representatives of member organizations and subject to the usual IP policy provisions; could be representatives of sponsoring organizations (they are not currently represented this way on rosters)
• Action Item: Chris Carr to propose policy for committee status of Technical Project Managers

• Document and Profile Inventory and Publication Schedule

• Unified Glossary: partial draft

Next steps and New Actions Items

• Next Meeting: Sept. 14, 9am CT

• Agenda Items:

Domain Coordination Committee