PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efurst (talk | contribs)
Items 70 - 79: Update Dec. 9 with closed Action Items
Efurst (talk | contribs)
Items 90 - 99: receive closed items
Line 106: Line 106:
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
!              align="left"  |Comments
!              align="left"  |Comments
|-
| align="center" | 90
| '''<Action Item>''' | Brief Profile Proposals
| '''<Owners>:'''  | As Noted
| '''<Participants>''' | See WGs
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.10.05
| '''<Status>''' | Close
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
* Summary as of Sept. 9:
:- RTLS - Ken will write up Brief Profile Proposal
:- MEM - Steve will write up Brief Profile Proposal
:- ACM to Enterprise - Monroe will write up Brief Profile Proposal for Extending ACM to Enterprise
:- Point of Care ID Management - Khalid, Todd will write up Brief Profile Proposal
:- Multi-Parameter Clinical Decision Support Data Integration, Communication and Analysis (MPCDSICA)
:- Location Tracking
:- Middleware Metrics (Brief Proposal)
:- QBD - Query for Bulk Data
: Brief Profile Proposals due the 25th, for PCD, ITI. Next week’s PCD PC meeting will include a review of the proposals received.
* Initial discussion will be held in advance of F2F. '''Dec. 9, 2009: Close. '''
|-
| align="center" | 91
| '''<Action Item>''' | Making the LOA optional
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009 Dec. 2
| '''<Status>''' | Close
| '''<Comments>:'''  | From F2F: Making the LOA optional without any detail is problematic. The group asked about: what is the rationale for Item 2 and why is section E optional? Patent Disclosure Wiki Page = IHE should modify page to provide link to the disclosure and to segment the page by profile and actor. Take to DCC. ''' Dec. 9, 2009: Close; activity is at Board level.'''
|-
| align="center" | 95
| '''<Action Item>''' | ADT Binding for Pumps
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Ruth, Gary
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.Nov. 18
| '''<Status>''' | Close
| '''<Comments>:'''  | F2F: See Thursday, Discussion Item 6; added Oct. 14. ''' Close; will be in detailed profile proposal.'''





Revision as of 00:54, 10 December 2009

Items 60 - 69

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments


62 Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible? Todd Co-chairs 2009.07.01 Closed Please see summary of June 3 for history http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_TC_2009-06-03_Webex#Discussion. John Rhoads reviewed the topic as discussed at the DCC. Ken and Todd took this to the DCC approximately 6 months ago. The DCC suggested PCD take the lead and coordinate the various IHE Domain. John indicated this was the same approach the DCC took again recently. Todd noted that Khalid is developing an approach for DPI and asked that John take this back to the DCC and he agreed to do so. Paul asked if bar codes (which are available in different standards) are the only identifier of interest. Others could include the patient’s photo. Todd suggested the PC draft a brief profile proposal that could be used to recruit ITI, Radiology and possibly PCC to join the effort. John asked Khalid if he would lead this effort and Khalid agreed to give this some thought. Paul noted that PCD-01 permits multiple patient identifiers. Change date to July 1.

October 28, 2009: Bar coding can be folded into patient ID (#84). Close.


Items 70 - 79

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments


79 Change Proposal Tutorial 2009.07.01 CLOSE Provide a tutorial on filing Change Proposals. These have been suggested and need CPs: ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; Infusion Pump: clarify coding. John Rhoads / Todd Cooper to contact those developing CPs to ensure the process is understood and properly managed.


Items 80 - 89

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
84 Patient Identity and PCD Messages Todd, Khalid, Gary 2009.07.01 Close How best to accomplish this tie will be addressed in the white paper for further development as a supplement to PIB (Todd). Coordination with IEEE (-20103 CCOM) and ICE-PAC will be accomplished Jan. Draft a patient association brief profile proposal (Khalid). The A04 registration message is not the commonly used message, while A01 is used by hospitals at admission (Gary). Gary will review this issue and it will be factored into the CPs for publication and testing in the 2010 Connectathon. Also see 62. Note related discussions in the Infusion Pump WG.Dec. 9, 2009" Close; folded into detailed profile proposal.
86 Test Tools John Garguilo, Rob Snellick Manny 2009.07.15 Close NIST will explore a registry for MWB files (Rob). Manny to request PCD Connectathon WG to post MWB files. Change date to June 17, add John Garguilo to the effort. NIST is open to providing incremental releases of "test artifacts" (which include MWB profiles). Need to determine when such information is desired to be available for viewing/browsing. This information would be part of the Testing Infrastructure as part of a public repository. Can we establish a date to make this available by? Members were asked to send Garguilo any MWB files that should be considered when developing registered profiles. Dec. 9, 2009: Close; NIST will add stable profiles to their registry. Combine with #66.
88 Cycle 4 Supplement Status Ken, Todd 2009.07.01 Close John Rhoads, Monroe, Paul offered to review the WCM document. Cycle 4 Supplement Status - Anticipated release dates are: IDCO - June 1; PIV - June 1; RTM - June 1; WCM - September 1. White Papers: DPI and MEM will be available this summer. PIV: Recent WG F2F: Todd briefly summarized the meeting. Those interested are referred to the Wiki page (see agenda list above). He noted it was a very productive meeting. RTM update: Paul found 40 errors and as a result is looking at automating the process for identifying them. He noted the harmonized table is looking good. Work continues on RTM ventilator terms. The RTM update should be available for TC ballot in about 10 days.

CPs: A number of change proposals are in development. He suggested that the PIV WG review these as soon as possible. Dec. 2, 2009: Close.


Items 90 - 99

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
90 Brief Profile Proposals As Noted See WGs 2009.10.05 Close
  • Summary as of Sept. 9:
- RTLS - Ken will write up Brief Profile Proposal
- MEM - Steve will write up Brief Profile Proposal
- ACM to Enterprise - Monroe will write up Brief Profile Proposal for Extending ACM to Enterprise
- Point of Care ID Management - Khalid, Todd will write up Brief Profile Proposal
- Multi-Parameter Clinical Decision Support Data Integration, Communication and Analysis (MPCDSICA)
- Location Tracking
- Middleware Metrics (Brief Proposal)
- QBD - Query for Bulk Data
Brief Profile Proposals due the 25th, for PCD, ITI. Next week’s PCD PC meeting will include a review of the proposals received.
  • Initial discussion will be held in advance of F2F. Dec. 9, 2009: Close.
91 Making the LOA optional 2009 Dec. 2 Close From F2F: Making the LOA optional without any detail is problematic. The group asked about: what is the rationale for Item 2 and why is section E optional? Patent Disclosure Wiki Page = IHE should modify page to provide link to the disclosure and to segment the page by profile and actor. Take to DCC. Dec. 9, 2009: Close; activity is at Board level.
95 ADT Binding for Pumps Ruth, Gary 2009.Nov. 18 Close F2F: See Thursday, Discussion Item 6; added Oct. 14. Close; will be in detailed profile proposal.


Items 100 - 109

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments




Go to PCD Technical Committee Action Items page.


Go to Patient Care Device home.