Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10 - Detailed Proposal moved to Rad TF Maintenance 2009-10: It's a given, not a proposal |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth): | Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth): | ||
:* | :* x-y% (Somewhat elastic. Most aren't urgent/critical. Some could be wrapped up post-cycle in April/June.) | ||
Responses to Issues: | Responses to Issues: | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 3 September 2009
Summary
Target: Prepare CP's for Ballot for April '10
Number of outstanding CPs:
- X Assigned CPs to work on
- CP-XXX : Name
- X Completed CPs to rework)
- CP-XXX : Name
- X New CPs to review/assign
- See "Incoming"
List of "non-trivial" CPs:
- CP-XXX : Title (Editor)
- Non-Trivial Issue
- CP-XXX : Title (Editor)
List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
- Harmonization work from the HL7 task force (when it becomes available) will affect the HL7 Implementation guide section(s) of the Framework.
List of other maintenance tasks:
- R2/RE Harmonization?
7. Risks
Any technical or political risks related to expected maintenance items?
9. Tech Cmte Evaluation
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
- x-y% (Somewhat elastic. Most aren't urgent/critical. Some could be wrapped up post-cycle in April/June.)
Responses to Issues:
- See italics in Risk and Open Issue sections
Candidate Editor:
- Chris Lindop/David Clunie