Difference between revisions of "PCD ICEPAC 2008-12-15"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (→Attachments / Materials: Added Attachments link) |
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (→Discussion: Updated) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)] | : [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)] | ||
− | == | + | == Meeting Minutes == |
+ | |||
+ | === Participants === | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Discission Summary === | ||
:{|border="2" | :{|border="2" | ||
Line 40: | Line 48: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 1 | | align="center" | 1 | ||
− | | '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- | + | | '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Host |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
+ | :* Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting. | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 2 | | align="center" | 2 | ||
− | | ''' | + | | '''Activity Diagram Review''' <br>- Jan |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | :* Jan Wittenber reviewed the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx/UML_PCA_ActivDiag_3jw.png PCA Activity Diagram (v3)]... | ||
+ | ::- The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously | ||
+ | ::- The '''black bars''' on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows. | ||
+ | ::- White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated. | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | :* (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer. | ||
+ | :* (Jan) update the diagram to add an output | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" | | + | | align="center" | 3 |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| '''...''' <br>- Group | | '''...''' <br>- Group | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
Line 87: | Line 80: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" | | + | | align="center" | 4 |
− | | ''' | + | | '''Next Steps''' <br>- TBD |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | :* The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up" | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | :* (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors. | ||
+ | :* (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios | ||
+ | :* (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" | | + | | align="center" | 5 |
− | | '''Next Meeting''' <br>- | + | | '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Host |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
− | :* Next meeting | + | :* Next meeting [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | January 5th, 2008 - same time & logistics]] |
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Next Meeting === | === Next Meeting === | ||
− | : | + | : [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | Next meeting is scheduled for January 5th, 2008 - same time]] |
Revision as of 18:05, 15 December 2008
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD DPI ICE-PCD Analysis Committee (ICE-PAC) Task Group regular discussion meeting. See the Proposed Agenda below for specific topics.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI ICE-PAC TG
Date: Monday, December 15th, 2008
Time: 3:00PM, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 90 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Tracy Rausch for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1 Review agenda
- 2 Review Activities to Date
- 3 Review Activity Diagrams
- 4 Next Steps
Attachments / Materials
Meeting Minutes
Participants
- Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host
- Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
Discission Summary
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- HostStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting.
Action(s):
2 Activity Diagram Review
- JanStatus/Discussion: - Jan Wittenber reviewed the PCA Activity Diagram (v3)...
- - The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously
- - The black bars on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows.
- - White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer.
- (Jan) update the diagram to add an output
3 ...
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 Next Steps
- TBDStatus/Discussion: - The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up"
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors.
- (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios
- (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case.
5 Next Meeting
- HostStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting January 5th, 2008 - same time & logistics
Action(s):
Next Meeting
<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">