PCD ICEPAC 2008-12-15: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs)
m Attachments / Materials: Added Attachments link
ToddCooper (talk | contribs)
m Discussion: Updated
Line 31: Line 31:
: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)]
: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)]


== Discussion ==  
== Meeting Minutes ==
 
=== Participants ===
 
: Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host
 
: Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
 
=== Discission Summary ===


:{|border="2"  
:{|border="2"  
Line 40: Line 48:
|-
|-
| align="center" | 1
| align="center" | 1
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Host
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting.


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
|-
|-
| align="center" | 2
| align="center" | 2
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Activity Diagram Review''' <br>- Jan
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
|-
| align="center" | 3
| '''...''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
|-
| align="center" | 4
| '''...''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Jan Wittenber reviewed the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx/UML_PCA_ActivDiag_3jw.png PCA Activity Diagram (v3)]...
::- The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously
::- The '''black bars''' on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows.
::- White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:* (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer.
:* (Jan) update the diagram to add an output


|-
|-
| align="center" | 5
| align="center" | 3
| '''...''' <br>- TBD
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 6
| '''...''' <br>- Group
| '''...''' <br>- Group
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Line 87: Line 80:


|-
|-
| align="center" | 7
| align="center" | 4
| '''...''' <br>- TBD
| '''Next Steps''' <br>- TBD
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up"


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:* (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors.
:* (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios
:* (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case.


|-
|-
| align="center" | 8
| align="center" | 5
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Host
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Next meeting '''''<TBD>'''''
:* Next meeting [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | January 5th, 2008 - same time & logistics]]
'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
|}
|}


=== Next Meeting ===
=== Next Meeting ===
:''<TBD''
: [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | Next meeting is scheduled for January 5th, 2008 - same time]]





Revision as of 18:05, 15 December 2008

(ICE-PAC Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD DPI ICE-PCD Analysis Committee (ICE-PAC) Task Group regular discussion meeting. See the Proposed Agenda below for specific topics.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI ICE-PAC TG

Date: Monday, December 15th, 2008

Time: 3:00PM, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Tracy Rausch for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 Review agenda
2 Review Activities to Date
3 Review Activity Diagrams
4 Next Steps


Attachments / Materials

Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)

Meeting Minutes

Participants

Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host
Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips)

Discission Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Host
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting.

Action(s):

2 Activity Diagram Review
- Jan
Status/Discussion:
- The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously
- The black bars on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows.
- White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer.
  • (Jan) update the diagram to add an output
3 ...
- Group
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Next Steps
- TBD
Status/Discussion:
  • The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up"

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors.
  • (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios
  • (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case.
5 Next Meeting
- Host
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting is scheduled for January 5th, 2008 - same time


<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">


PCD Home