Difference between revisions of "PCD ICEPAC 2008-12-15"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Attachments / Materials: Added Attachments link)
m (→‎Discussion: Updated)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)]
 
: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)]
  
== Discussion ==  
+
== Meeting Minutes ==
 +
 
 +
=== Participants ===
 +
 
 +
: Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host
 +
 
 +
: Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
 +
 
 +
=== Discission Summary ===
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
Line 40: Line 48:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 1
 
| align="center" | 1
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Host
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
:* Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting.
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 2
 
| align="center" | 2
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Activity Diagram Review''' <br>- Jan
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
 
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 3
 
| '''...''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
 
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 4
 
| '''...''' <br>- Chair
 
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:* Jan Wittenber reviewed the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Coordination/ICE-PAC/20081215_WebEx/UML_PCA_ActivDiag_3jw.png PCA Activity Diagram (v3)]...
 +
::- The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously
 +
::- The '''black bars''' on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows.
 +
::- White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated.
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer.
 +
:* (Jan) update the diagram to add an output
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 5
+
| align="center" | 3
| '''...''' <br>- TBD
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
 
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
 
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 6
 
 
| '''...''' <br>- Group
 
| '''...''' <br>- Group
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Line 87: Line 80:
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 7
+
| align="center" | 4
| '''...''' <br>- TBD
+
| '''Next Steps''' <br>- TBD
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:* The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up"
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors.
 +
:* (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios
 +
:* (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case.
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 8
+
| align="center" | 5
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Host
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Next meeting '''''<TBD>'''''
+
:* Next meeting [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | January 5th, 2008 - same time & logistics]]
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
=== Next Meeting ===
 
=== Next Meeting ===
:''<TBD''
+
: [[PCD_ICEPAC_2008-12-15 | Next meeting is scheduled for January 5th, 2008 - same time]]
  
  

Revision as of 18:05, 15 December 2008

(ICE-PAC Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD DPI ICE-PCD Analysis Committee (ICE-PAC) Task Group regular discussion meeting. See the Proposed Agenda below for specific topics.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI ICE-PAC TG

Date: Monday, December 15th, 2008

Time: 3:00PM, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Tracy Rausch for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 Review agenda
2 Review Activities to Date
3 Review Activity Diagrams
4 Next Steps


Attachments / Materials

Documents posted for the meeting (ftp site)

Meeting Minutes

Participants

Tracy Rausch (DocBox) - Host
Jon Blasingame (Philips), Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), Rick Schrenker (Partners), Sandy Weininger (FDA), Jan Wittenber (Philips)

Discission Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Host
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Group agreed to the agenda for the meeting.

Action(s):

2 Activity Diagram Review
- Jan
Status/Discussion:
- The major sections of the model correlate directly with the PCA workflow reviewed previously
- The black bars on the diagram represent join points where multiple flows feed into the same activity entry point; they are not synchronized and may be concurrent flows.
- White diamonds indicate decision points; problem is that the modeling tool does not allow for adding text directly to the diamond, which would make it clear as to what is being evaluated.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Jan) adjust diagram to make decision (white) diamonds criteria clearer.
  • (Jan) update the diagram to add an output
3 ...
- Group
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Next Steps
- TBD
Status/Discussion:
  • The group agreed that the Activity Diagram reviewed during this meeting was a good start and that now attention should be focused on expanding both the clinical use cases and perhaps looking at a specific deployment and working "backwards" / "device up"

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Tracy) Develop an interaction diagram, based on this Activity diag, using the ICE actors.
  • (Trach) Extend the above to indluce some additional clinical scenarios
  • (Jan & Group) Use the vent x-ray sync example to see how well this approach accounts for this deployment "from device up" use case.
5 Next Meeting
- Host
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting is scheduled for January 5th, 2008 - same time


<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">


PCD Home