Rad Plan Minutes 2008-10-22: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
:* Overview of '''[[Radiology_Proposals_2008-2009|Proposal Evaluations]]''' (See Table)
:* Overview of '''[[Radiology_Proposals_2008-2009|Proposal Evaluations]]''' (See Table)
::* General understanding of proposals within committee is good; focus on advocacy, reasons for priority
::* General understanding of proposals within committee is good; focus on advocacy, reasons for priority
::* Basic Image Review
:::* Addresses display requirements, particularly for consumption by referring physicians
:::* Urgency of need has been expressed by medical societies in US
:::* Model for setting display requirements is established in Nuc Med and Mammo display profiles


::* XDS-I Using XDS.b technology
::* XDS-I Using XDS.b technology
Line 31: Line 36:
:::* Provides workflow functions (delete, replace, etc.) in distributed environments
:::* Provides workflow functions (delete, replace, etc.) in distributed environments
:::* Addresses critical needs of current installations in Multi-PACS environments
:::* Addresses critical needs of current installations in Multi-PACS environments
:::* Question about whether underlying standards are in place to efficiently address the issue
:::* Question about whether underlying standards are in place to efficiently address the issue; concern about misusing standards


:* Brief Review of [[Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap]]
:* Brief Review of [[Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap]]

Revision as of 11:44, 22 October 2008

Attendees

  • Chris Lindop (Co-chair) - GE
  • Kevin O'Donnell (Co-chair) - Toshiba
  • David Clunie, MD - RadPharm
  • Dick Donker - Philips
  • Dave Heaney - McKesson
  • Mike Henderson - Eastern Informatics
  • Cor Loef - Philips
  • John Paganini - Guardian
  • Paul Seifert - Agfa
  • Niki Wirsz, PhD - Siemens
  • Chris Carr - RSNA
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA

Minutes

Final Selection of 2008-09 Work Items

  • Attendance & Review of Voting Privileges
  • Discussion of voting procedure
  • Assemble slates of proposals reflecting work budget (roughly) and vote on slates
  • General understanding of proposals within committee is good; focus on advocacy, reasons for priority
  • Basic Image Review
  • Addresses display requirements, particularly for consumption by referring physicians
  • Urgency of need has been expressed by medical societies in US
  • Model for setting display requirements is established in Nuc Med and Mammo display profiles
  • XDS-I Using XDS.b technology
  • Aligns radiology with direction of ITI committees and implementation projects
  • Strong desire in Radiology Informatics Committee to promote this as future direction of Image Sharing
  • Image Management Enhancements
  • Provides workflow functions (delete, replace, etc.) in distributed environments
  • Addresses critical needs of current installations in Multi-PACS environments
  • Question about whether underlying standards are in place to efficiently address the issue; concern about misusing standards
  • Review of Proposal Evaluations (5 min each)
  • Advocacy and Discussion


  • Voting