Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-17: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
* Estimate effort level required with each proposal
* Estimate effort level required with each proposal
** Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
** Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
* Establish strategic priorities within domain
* Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
* Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
* Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes
* Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes




# Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal
====Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal====
# XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal
====XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal====
* Need to decide upon the scope of development for this cycle and priority
** XDS-I and image sharing across care sites is a politically hot topic
** Is it a problem IHE can advance a useful solution for and achieve adoption?
** Will updating XDS-I to XDS.b lead to dramatic improvement in adoption?
** Within a given PACS environment, Web access is a feature already typically available
** Add PHR use case to XDS-I?
** Address Web services-based transfer protocol for images in coordination with DICOM WG10 and ITI?
** Canadian model is to establish centralized architecture for DI: regional PACS
# PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
# PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
# Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal
# Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal

Revision as of 09:11, 17 September 2008

Attendees

  • David Clunie, MD - RadPharm
  • Chris Lindop - GE (Co-chair)
  • Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba (Co-chair)
  • Paul Seifert - Agfa
  • Peter Mildenberger, MD - DRG
  • David Mendelson, MD - RSNA
  • Jerold Wallis, MD - SNM

Minutes

Review of Brief Profile Proposals

  • Estimate bandwidth of Technical Committee to review proposals
  • Establish general strategy for development cycle: aggressive development or consolidation?
  • Estimate effort level required with each proposal
    • Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
  • Establish strategic priorities within domain
  • Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
  • Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes


Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal

XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal

  • Need to decide upon the scope of development for this cycle and priority
    • XDS-I and image sharing across care sites is a politically hot topic
    • Is it a problem IHE can advance a useful solution for and achieve adoption?
    • Will updating XDS-I to XDS.b lead to dramatic improvement in adoption?
    • Within a given PACS environment, Web access is a feature already typically available
    • Add PHR use case to XDS-I?
    • Address Web services-based transfer protocol for images in coordination with DICOM WG10 and ITI?
    • Canadian model is to establish centralized architecture for DI: regional PACS
  1. PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
  2. Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal
  3. Mammography Workstation Bidirectional Interface
  4. Scheduled Workflow II Phase 2 - Brief Proposal
  5. Cross Community Access for Imaging (XCA-I) - Brief Proposal
  6. Image Management Enhancements - Brief Proposal

Vote on Proposals to go on Short List

  • Action: Rad Plan Cochairs will send the Short List to Tech Cmte for feasibility and effort evaluation

Approach to Making XDS-I compatible with XDS.b