HL7 Review Task Force 2008-06-27: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Chris Carr, RSNA
Chris Carr, RSNA
Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
==Attendees==
Yongjian Bao PhD, GE
Chris Lindop, GE
Lisa Spellman, HIMSS
Chris Carr, RSNA
Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
==Minutes==
===Reconciling PAM and SWF===
* Comparison of Trigger Events
** Yongjian Bao provided a [[spreadsheet comparing trigger events in SWF and PAM
** Work through with Task Force on Next tcon
===Cleaning Up Inconsistencies in Text about HL7 Versioning in Rad TF and ITI TF===
* Comparison of Rad TF section 2.3 and 2.4 (Message Control and Conventions) with ITI TF Appendix C
** Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
*** Needs a clear statement on how HL7 version number attribute is defined and handled
*** Clarify requirements for acknowledgment mode for both sender and received side (currently only defined for receiver)
*** Clarify notation and other inconsistencies in the texts
** Use Rad TF text as a basis for normative text for systems using HL7 v. 2.3.1 and use ITI TF Appendix C as starting point for rules about using HL7 v 2.5
** Goal is to have a section of ITI TF as the "canonical" statement of managing HL7 versions; Rad TF and others (Eye Care, Cardio, etc) would reference this section
===Next Meeting===
* '''Thursday, July 17, 9am CDT'''
* PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events
* Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs

Revision as of 10:53, 27 June 2008

Attendees

Yongjian Bao PhD, GE Chris Lindop, GE Lisa Spellman, HIMSS Chris Carr, RSNA Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA


Attendees

Yongjian Bao PhD, GE Chris Lindop, GE Lisa Spellman, HIMSS Chris Carr, RSNA Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA


Minutes

Reconciling PAM and SWF

  • Comparison of Trigger Events
    • Yongjian Bao provided a [[spreadsheet comparing trigger events in SWF and PAM
    • Work through with Task Force on Next tcon

Cleaning Up Inconsistencies in Text about HL7 Versioning in Rad TF and ITI TF

  • Comparison of Rad TF section 2.3 and 2.4 (Message Control and Conventions) with ITI TF Appendix C
    • Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
      • Needs a clear statement on how HL7 version number attribute is defined and handled
      • Clarify requirements for acknowledgment mode for both sender and received side (currently only defined for receiver)
      • Clarify notation and other inconsistencies in the texts
    • Use Rad TF text as a basis for normative text for systems using HL7 v. 2.3.1 and use ITI TF Appendix C as starting point for rules about using HL7 v 2.5
    • Goal is to have a section of ITI TF as the "canonical" statement of managing HL7 versions; Rad TF and others (Eye Care, Cardio, etc) would reference this section

Next Meeting

  • Thursday, July 17, 9am CDT
  • PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events
  • Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=HL7_Review_Task_Force_2008-06-27&oldid=21353"