ITI Agenda October 2025 F2F: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Lduncan (talk | contribs)
401 edits
No edit summary
Line 178: Line 178:
| id="02-25-0830" | ITI Tech/Planning
| id="02-25-0830" | ITI Tech/Planning
| style="text-align: left" |  
| style="text-align: left" |  
* Reviewed new work items
== Attendees ==
** Accepted MHD R5 version for IHE Europe
* Steve Nichols – GE HealthCare, Planning co-chair
** Accepted Full Text Search
* Andrea Fourquet – eHealthSign
* Lori Fourquet – eHealthSign
* Andreas Klingler – Siemens
* Chris Melo – Philips
* Diletta Babato – Arsenàl.IT
* Gudrun Liß – IHE Germany
* John Moehrke – IHE Europe
* Luke Duncan – Path, Planning co-chair
* Oliver Egger – ahdis ag
* Raik Kuhlisch – gematik
* Spencer LaGesse – Epic
* Matt Blackmon – Sequoia
* Michael Onken – gematik
* Martin Rosner – Philips
* Vivi Hen – gematik
 
== Work Item Proposals Discussed ==
 
=== 1) MHD on FHIR R5 (parallel to R4) ===
; Goal
* Provide an MHD-on-FHIR R5 track in parallel to today’s normative MHD on FHIR R4. This does not deprecate R4.
 
; Positioning / Fragmentation Concern
* Creating an R5 line effectively introduces two MHD profiles (R4 and R5).
* R4 remains the normative version and is the line presented and tested at IHE Connectathons.
* The R5 line will be presented as a segment targeted to regions operating under EHDS needs (e.g., EU projectathons), without signaling a global migration.
* Packaging, branching, version suffixes, and page placement will be refined in Technical Committee meetings.
 
; Editorial/Packaging Approach
* Maintain a versioned branch of the MHD repository for the R5 work.
* Publish as a separate major line with a clear suffix (for example, “-R5”) to avoid confusion with the 4.x line.
 
; Technical Notes
* Most of MHD is unchanged; the largest delta is in DocumentReference.
* AuditEvent will be profiled directly for R5, with future alignment to BALP as appropriate.
* Dependencies expected to remain stable or version-agnostic; MHDS update is out of scope.
 
; Implementation Guidance
* Support both Source and Responder options where relevant.
* Keep options tightly scoped and testable.
* Treat the R5 line as suitable for national/regional extensions and EHDS events while avoiding pressure on global sites to switch.
* Running two live lines increases maintenance; keep diffs minimal and document precise deltas.
 
=== 2) Full-Text Search for Document Sharing ===
; Goal
* Add server-side cross-document full-text search to IHE Document Sharing so clinicians can find relevant unstructured documents (e.g., PDFs) without opening each one.
 
; Scope / Positioning
* Complements existing metadata/structured queries (XDS/MHD, mXDE, QEDm).
* Limit scope to MHD unstructured content search; leave structured extraction to existing profiles.
* Define minimal, testable options (query parameters, response fields, snippet behavior, ranking hints).
 
== Consensus ==
* Proceed with MHD-on-R5 as a parallel line; R4 remains recommended.
* Keep MHD-R5 scope limited to what is required for R5 alignment (no net-new functionality).
* Continue technical exploration of Full-Text Search within MHD with tight, testable options.
 
== Action Items ==
# John Moehrke: Set up the MHD-R5 branch and seed with the initial change list (DocumentReference diffs, AuditEvent approach, examples, and a cross-reference table).
# gematik participants (Michael Onken, Raik Kuhlisch) and interested parties: Provide EU/EHDS projectathon expectations and testing scenarios to guide scope and timing.
# Full-Text Search proponents: Draft initial option text for MHD actors and propose conformance test cases.
# Planning/Tech co-chairs: Define publication placement/labels so R5 is findable without implying replacement of R4.
 


|}
|}

Revision as of 09:44, 10 October 2025

This 4-days meeting is to move forward all the current work items in the continuous development cycle. The [ITI Project Planning Board]

Meeting Location - Virtual

Google Meet information for this meeting is:

Join the Meeting Here


Agenda & Minutes

All times listed are tentative and may be revised during the meeting; refresh often.

Monday, 06 October 2025

Day 1: Monday, 06 October 2025
Time

Virtual (CST, UTC−06:00)

Leads Activity Notes
8:30 am–9:00 am Luke / Oliver / Steve

Participants: Luke Duncan, Alessia Favero, Chris Melo, John Moehrke, Matt Blackmon, Oliver Egger, Ritika Rawlani, Steve Nichols, Carl Leitner, Spencer LaGesse, Diletta Babato Minutes:

  • Goals:
    • VHL - continuing
    • XCDR - continuing
    • Sex & gender - published with CP Integration
    • De-identification Handbook - continuing
9:00 am–10:30 am Ritika / Carl Verifiable Health Links
11:00 am–12:00 pm Vassil XCDR Endpoint Addressing
  • Reviewed work item
  • CP has been started and will upload to Incoming.
1:00 pm–3:00 pm Luke / Oliver Github Maintenance
  • Reviewed pull requests and new issues across github repos

Tuesday, 07 October 2025

Day 2: Tuesday, 07 October 2025
Time

Virtual (CST, UTC−06:00)

Leads Activity Notes
8:30 am–10:30 am Ritika / Carl VHL

Participants: Luke, Spencer, Carl, Ritika, Alessia, Diletta, Oliver, Daniel Berezeanu ,Matt

11:00 am–12:00 pm Luke / Oliver Github Maintenance
  • Reviewed and accepted pull requests
1:00 pm–3:00 pm Luke / Oliver CP Integration
  • Reviewed all pending pull requests for CP Integration for 2025
3:00 am–4:00 pm Matt / Daniel Connectathon Discussion
3:00 pm–5:00 pm tbd

Wednesday, 08 October 2025

Day 3: Wednesday, 08 October 2025
Time

Virtual (CST, UTC−06:00)

Leads Activity Notes
11:00 am–12:00pm Vassil XCDR Endpoint Addressing

Participants: Luke, Oliver, Matt, Alessia, Spencer, Diletta, Steve, Vassil

  • Reviewed CP and proposed changes
  • Will have recurring meeting starting Nov 6 at 10 CT
1:00 pm–3:00pm Oliver CP Maintenance
  • Reviewed Incoming CPs
3:00 pm–5:00pm all Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH

Thursday, 09 October 2025

Day 4: Thursday, 09 October 2025
Time

Virtual (CST, UTC−06:00)

Leads Activity Notes
8:30 am–10:30am Alain De-Identification Handbook
11:00 am–1:00 pm Steve / Luke / Oliver ITI Tech/Planning

Attendees

  • Steve Nichols – GE HealthCare, Planning co-chair
  • Andrea Fourquet – eHealthSign
  • Lori Fourquet – eHealthSign
  • Andreas Klingler – Siemens
  • Chris Melo – Philips
  • Diletta Babato – Arsenàl.IT
  • Gudrun Liß – IHE Germany
  • John Moehrke – IHE Europe
  • Luke Duncan – Path, Planning co-chair
  • Oliver Egger – ahdis ag
  • Raik Kuhlisch – gematik
  • Spencer LaGesse – Epic
  • Matt Blackmon – Sequoia
  • Michael Onken – gematik
  • Martin Rosner – Philips
  • Vivi Hen – gematik

Work Item Proposals Discussed

1) MHD on FHIR R5 (parallel to R4)

Goal
  • Provide an MHD-on-FHIR R5 track in parallel to today’s normative MHD on FHIR R4. This does not deprecate R4.
Positioning / Fragmentation Concern
  • Creating an R5 line effectively introduces two MHD profiles (R4 and R5).
  • R4 remains the normative version and is the line presented and tested at IHE Connectathons.
  • The R5 line will be presented as a segment targeted to regions operating under EHDS needs (e.g., EU projectathons), without signaling a global migration.
  • Packaging, branching, version suffixes, and page placement will be refined in Technical Committee meetings.
Editorial/Packaging Approach
  • Maintain a versioned branch of the MHD repository for the R5 work.
  • Publish as a separate major line with a clear suffix (for example, “-R5”) to avoid confusion with the 4.x line.
Technical Notes
  • Most of MHD is unchanged; the largest delta is in DocumentReference.
  • AuditEvent will be profiled directly for R5, with future alignment to BALP as appropriate.
  • Dependencies expected to remain stable or version-agnostic; MHDS update is out of scope.
Implementation Guidance
  • Support both Source and Responder options where relevant.
  • Keep options tightly scoped and testable.
  • Treat the R5 line as suitable for national/regional extensions and EHDS events while avoiding pressure on global sites to switch.
  • Running two live lines increases maintenance; keep diffs minimal and document precise deltas.

2) Full-Text Search for Document Sharing

Goal
  • Add server-side cross-document full-text search to IHE Document Sharing so clinicians can find relevant unstructured documents (e.g., PDFs) without opening each one.
Scope / Positioning
  • Complements existing metadata/structured queries (XDS/MHD, mXDE, QEDm).
  • Limit scope to MHD unstructured content search; leave structured extraction to existing profiles.
  • Define minimal, testable options (query parameters, response fields, snippet behavior, ranking hints).

Consensus

  • Proceed with MHD-on-R5 as a parallel line; R4 remains recommended.
  • Keep MHD-R5 scope limited to what is required for R5 alignment (no net-new functionality).
  • Continue technical exploration of Full-Text Search within MHD with tight, testable options.

Action Items

  1. John Moehrke: Set up the MHD-R5 branch and seed with the initial change list (DocumentReference diffs, AuditEvent approach, examples, and a cross-reference table).
  2. gematik participants (Michael Onken, Raik Kuhlisch) and interested parties: Provide EU/EHDS projectathon expectations and testing scenarios to guide scope and timing.
  3. Full-Text Search proponents: Draft initial option text for MHD actors and propose conformance test cases.
  4. Planning/Tech co-chairs: Define publication placement/labels so R5 is findable without implying replacement of R4.


Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Agenda_October_2025_F2F&oldid=135302"