Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.19: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:33, 30 November 2007

-->>1.1.19 should be 1.4.19<<--

-->>

(I'm not 100% about this one and would appreciate some feedback if I've misunderstood something.)

In the example is the following piece of XML:

  <entryRelationship typeCode='REFR'>
    <encounter classCode='ENC' moodCode=''>
      <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.4.1'/>
      <id root='' extension=''/>
    </encounter>
  </entryRelationship>

However, in the definition of template ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.4.1 (Internal Reference) there is the following statement: "For compatibility with the Clinical Statement model the internal reference shall always use the <act> class, regardless of the XML element type of the act it refers to." Therefore, I believe the <encounter> should actually be an <act>.

<<--

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Fixme|1.1.19 should be 1.4.19}}
+{{Fixme |
+(I'm not 100% about this one and would appreciate some feedback if I've misunderstood something.)
+In the example is the following piece of XML:
+<pre>
+  <entryRelationship typeCode&#61;'REFR'>
+    <encounter classCode&#61;'ENC' moodCode&#61;''>
+      <templateId root&#61;'1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.4.1'/>
+      <id root&#61;'' extension&#61;''/>
+    </encounter>
+  </entryRelationship>
+</pre>
+However, in the definition of template ID [[1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.4.1]] (Internal Reference) there is the following statement: "For compatibility with the Clinical Statement model the internal reference shall always use the <act> class, regardless of the XML element type of the act it refers to."  Therefore, I believe the <encounter> should actually be an <act>.
+}}

Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.19: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:33, 30 November 2007

Navigation menu

Search