Difference between revisions of "EduCom Minutes 2018-10-16"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:* Stefan Sauermann | :* Stefan Sauermann | ||
:* Werner Henschelchen | :* Werner Henschelchen | ||
+ | :* Laura Bright | ||
* Review and Approve Agenda | * Review and Approve Agenda |
Revision as of 11:32, 16 October 2018
Meeting details
Monday, 16th October 2018, 10am - 11:30 CT (5pm-6.30 Vienna Time)
Welcome
- Participants
- Jürgen Brandstätter
- Stefan Sauermann
- Werner Henschelchen
- Laura Bright
- Review and Approve Agenda
- Approved
Roles and Processes for Exam Development
- Discussion, see process overview image
- according to EN ISO/IEC 17024 (2012, confirmed 2018) we want to make sure that exam designers and training providers do not experience conflicts of interest.
- Status on structure (Werner)
- Under the Education Committee we form a sub-committee "Education Exam Sub-committee"
- Members should be experts on exam questions, but may consult other groups for advice and recommendations
- Goal: Maximize independency in creating exam question
- Responsibilities
- Creation and maintenance of an exam question pool
- Question recommendations may be delivered by individual members "directly" of the Education Committee (no review of Education Group should occur)
- Creation of the exam structure, based on the learning outcomes developed by the Education Committee
- Note: The random combination of questions to exams is done by the exam provider
- Contraints
- Members must be independent from training (trainers, teachers, training providers, tutor, training material producers, etc.)
- Members are allowed to be part of the Education Committee
- Minimum member count: 4
- Members MUST NOT be active in the training sector for a minimum of 1 year after resigning of the group
- Note: One-way restriction: Trainers stopping their business may become member of this sub-committee immediately
- Decision: Education Exam sub-committee is created
- Chair: Werner Henschelchen
- Members:
- Action item: Send out invitation to group (Jürgen)
- Minimum requirement: Commitment to remain in the group until first exam is finished
- Steps to final exam:
- Getting min 3 members for Exam sub-committee
- Finalize Business Outcomes
- Finalize Learning Outcomes
- Question pool creation process, on the basis of the Learning Outcomes:
- 1) Existing exam questions (example questions, questions of Stefan's university) will be submitted to Exam sub-committee
- 2) Send out invitation to the group to submit proposals for exam questions to exam sub-committee
- 3) Exam sub-committee processes and maps all incoming questions to the learning outcomes
- 4) Remaining exam questions will be developed by Exam sub-committee
- Note: Exam question format: Multiple Choice Question type (select 1 out of 4-6)
Business Outcomes and Learning Outcomes
- Discussion, incoming comments
- Business Outcomes
- No comments since we processed them last call
- Learning Outcomes
- Reviewed until point 2
- Will be continued offline and next call
- Decision for timeline:
- Finalizing Learning Outcomes October 30th
- Final approval of Business and Learning Outcomes at call November 14th (moved from 13th)
Any other business
- None
Next Meetings
- Tuesday, Oct 30, 5-6:30pm Vienna time
- Tuesday, Nov 14, 5-6:30pm Vienna time (moved from 13th)